Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2303021707
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sirlin, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Casola, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sirlin, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Casola, G.
(Radiology 2004;230:661-668.)
© RSNA, 2004


Emergency Radiology

Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Clinical Value of Negative Screening US Scans1

Claude B. Sirlin, MD, Michèle A. Brown, MD, Olga A. Andrade-Barreto, MD, Reena Deutsch, PhD, Dale A. Fortlage, BA, David B. Hoyt, MD and Giovanna Casola, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (C.B.S., M.A.B., O.A.A., G.C.), Family and Preventive Medicine (R.D.), and Surgery (D.A.F., D.B.H.), University of California, San Diego Medical Center, 200 W Arbor Dr, MC 8756, San Diego, CA 92103-8756. From the 2000 RSNA scientific assembly. Received December 17, 2002; revision requested February 27, 2003; final revision received August 5; accepted August 22. R.D. supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant M01 RR00827. Address correspondence to C.B.S. (e-mail: csirlin@ucsd.edu).

PURPOSE: To assess clinical and surgical outcomes in patients with blunt abdominal trauma and negative screening ultrasonographic (US) scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a database of 4,000 patients who underwent screening US for suspected blunt abdominal trauma at a level 1 trauma center, the authors retrospectively identified 3,679 patients with negative US findings. In these patients, outcome was determined by means of retrospective review of the trauma registry and all radiologic, surgical, and autopsy reports. In patients with false-negative findings at screening US, all imaging studies and medical charts were also reviewed. Proportions were statistically compared by means of the Pearson {chi}2 and Fisher exact tests. Monte Carlo estimation was applied when expected frequencies were low.

RESULTS: Among the 3,679 patients with negative findings at screening US, 99.9% (n = 3,641) had no injuries (true-negative findings). Differences in true-negative rates as a function of year (P > .5) or time of day (P > .3) were not significant. Among the 3,641 patients with true-negative findings, 93.6% (n = 3,407) required no additional tests and 6.4% (n = 234) underwent computed tomography or other tests. The percentage of patients who underwent additional tests was significantly higher in the 1st year of the study (19.2%) than in subsequent years (all comparisons, P < .001). Thirty-eight patients had false-negative US findings for abdominal injury. The injuries that were missed in 24 patients were nonsurgical (those that were treated successfully without intervention or were considered minor at autopsy) and those in 14 patients were surgical (required surgical intervention). Cumulatively, 65 injuries were missed. The six most common injuries included retroperitoneal hematoma (n = 13) and injuries in the spleen (n = 10), liver (n = 9), kidney (n = 8), adrenal gland (n = 8), and small bowel (n = 7). Twenty-five of the 38 patients had no or trace hemoperitoneum. Mean diagnostic delay until recognition of missed injury was 16.8 hours ± 4.3 (standard error of the mean). The missed injury was identified within 12 hours in 19 of the 38 patients and within 24 hours in 34.

CONCLUSION: The combination of negative US findings and negative clinical observation virtually excludes abdominal injury in patients who are admitted and observed for at least 12–24 hours.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Abdomen, CT, 70.12112, 70.12115 • Abdomen, injuries, 70.41, 70.43 • Abdomen, US, 70.1298, 70.12984 • Trauma, 70.41, 70.43




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. C. Lee, E. L. Ormsby, J. P. McGahan, G. M. Melendres, and J. R. Richards
The Utility of Sonography for the Triage of Blunt Abdominal Trauma Patients to Exploratory Laparotomy
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 415 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. P. McGahan, S. Horton, E. O. Gerscovich, M. Gillen, J. R. Richards, M. S. Cronan, J. M. Brock, F. Battistella, D. H. Wisner, and J. F. Holmes
Appearance of solid organ injury with contrast-enhanced sonography in blunt abdominal trauma: preliminary experience.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 658 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
radtechHome page
T. G. ODLE
Blunt Pelvic Trauma
Radiol. Technol., January 1, 2006; 77(3): 200 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Sosna, T. Sella, D. Shaham, S. C. Shapira, A. Rivkind, A. I. Bloom, and E. Libson
Facing the New Threats of Terrorism: Radiologists' Perspectives Based on Experience in Israel
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 28 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Stengel, K. Bauwens, G. Rademacher, S. Mutze, and A. Ekkernkamp
Association between Compliance with Methodological Standards of Diagnostic Research and Reported Test Accuracy: Meta-Analysis of Focused Assessment of US for Trauma
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 102 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Farahmand, C. B. Sirlin, M. A. Brown, G. P. Shragg, D. Fortlage, D. B. Hoyt, and G. Casola
Hypotensive Patients with Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Performance of Screening US
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 436 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
O. Catalano, R. Lobianco, M. M. Raso, and A. Siani
Blunt Hepatic Trauma: Evaluation With Contrast-Enhanced Sonography: Sonographic Findings and Clinical Application
J. Ultrasound Med., March 1, 2005; 24(3): 299 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. A. Brown, C. B. Sirlin, N. Farahmand, D. B. Hoyt, and G. Casola
Screening Sonography in Pregnant Patients With Blunt Abdominal Trauma
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2005; 24(2): 175 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Megremis, N. Segkos, A. Andrianaki, G. Gavridakis, K. Psillakis, L. Triantafyllou, N. Katsougris, M. Michalakis, and E. Sfakianaki
Sonographic Diagnosis and Monitoring of an Obstructing Duodenal Hematoma After Blunt Trauma: Correlation With Computed Tomographic and Surgical Findings
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2004; 23(12): 1679 - 1683.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. T. Shaw, C. B. Sirlin, M. A. Brown, R. Deutsch, O. A. Andrade-Barreto, D. Fortlage, D. B. Hoyt, and G. Casola
The Golden Hour: How to Spend Your Time and Money in Trauma Radiology * Dr Sirlin and colleagues respond:
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 622 - 624.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.