Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2303030473
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hogan, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sunshine, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hogan, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sunshine, J. H.
(Radiology 2004;230:774-782.)
© RSNA, 2004


Health Policy and Practice

Financial Ratios in Diagnostic Radiology Practices: Variability and Trends1

Christopher Hogan, PhD and Jonathan H. Sunshine, PhD

1 From Direct Research, Vienna, Va (C.H.); and Department of Research, American College of Radiology, 1891 Preston White Dr, Reston, VA 20191-4397 and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Conn (J.H.S.). Received March 20, 2003; revision requested May 28; revision received August 5; accepted August 22. Address correspondence to J.H.S. (e-mail: jonathans@acr.org).

PURPOSE: To evaluate variation in financial ratios for radiology practices nationwide and trends in these ratios and in payments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 1999, the American College of Radiology surveyed radiology practices by mail. The final response rate was 66%. Weighting was used to make responses representative of all radiology practices in the United States. Self-reported financial ratios (payments, charges, accounts receivable turnover) were analyzed; 449 responses had usable data on these ratios. Comparison with results of a similar 1992 survey and combined analysis with Medicare data on billed charges provided information on trends.

RESULTS: All measures of payment collections declined sharply from 1992 to 1999, with the gross collections rate (revenues as percentage of billed charges) decreasing from 71% to 55%. Average payment for a typical radiology service decreased approximately 4% in dollar terms or approximately 19% in inflation-adjusted terms. In 1999, nonmetropolitan practices appeared to fare better than others. Among insurers, Medicaid stood out as a low and slow payer, but neither managed care nor Medicare had a consistent effect on financial ratios. The gross collections rate varied substantially across geographic areas, as did, in an inverse pattern, the level of billed charges. One-quarter of practices had accounts receivable equal to 90 or more days of billings.

CONCLUSION: The opposing geographic pattern of billed charges and gross collection rate suggests that geographic variation in the latter is driven more by variation in billed charges than by variation in payment levels. Radiologists saw a substantial decrease in the real (inflation-adjusted) value of payment per service during the 1990s. The large fraction of practices with accounts receivable of 90 or more days of billings—a level considered potentially imprudent by financial management advisors—suggests that many practices should improve financial management and that state prompt-payment laws have not had a substantial positive effect.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Economics, medical • Radiology and radiologists, departmental management • Radiology and radiologists, socioeconomic issues




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. P. Krestin, J. C. Miller, S. J. Golding, G. G. Frija, G. M. Glazer, H. G. Ringertz, and J. H. Thrall
Reinventing Radiology in a Digital and Molecular Age: Summary of Proceedings of the Sixth Biannual Symposium of the International Society for Strategic Studies in Radiology (IS3R), August 25 27, 2005
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 633 - 638.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. S. Lewis, J. H. Sunshine,, and M. Bhargavan
A portrait of breast imaging specialists and of the interpretation of mammography in the United States.
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2006; 187(5): W456 - W468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Merewitz and J. H. Sunshine
A Portrait of Pediatric Radiologists in the United States
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 12 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Sunshine, R. S. Lewis, and M. Bhargavan
A Portrait of Interventional Radiologists in the United States
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1103 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Ondategui-Parra, J. G. Bhagwat, K. H. Zou, E. Nathanson, I. E. Gill, and P. R. Ros
Use of Productivity and Financial Indicators for Monitoring Performance in Academic Radiology Departments: U.S. Nationwide Survey
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 214 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Sunshine and Y. S. Cypel
Types of Procedures Performed by Diagnostic Radiology Practices: Past Patterns and Future Directions
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2004; 183(5): 1193 - 1201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.