Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2303030111
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pelage, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Spies, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pelage, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Spies, J. B.
(Radiology 2004;230:803-809.)
© RSNA, 2004


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Uterine Fibroid Tumors: Long-term MR Imaging Outcome after Embolization1

Jean-Pierre Pelage, MD, Noureddine Guaou Guaou, MD, Reena C. Jha, MD, Susan M. Ascher, MD and James B. Spies, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, CG 201, Washington, DC 20007-2197. Received January 21, 2003; revision requested April 11; revision received May 28; accepted July 1. Address correspondence to J.B.S. (e-mail: spiesj@gunet.georgetown.edu).

PURPOSE: To assess and report the long-term magnetic resonance (MR) imaging outcomes of fibroid tumors treated with uterine artery embolization (UAE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast material–enhanced pelvic MR imaging was performed in 20 patients before UAE, at 3 months after UAE, and then yearly for up to 3 years. Two readers compared the uterine fibroid, dominant (ie, largest) fibroid, and percentage of perfusion measurements from each of these examinations by using intraclass correlations. Seventeen patients underwent contrast-enhanced MR imaging at baseline and 3 months and 3 years after treatment. Among these patients, those with complete infarction were compared with those with incomplete infarction of the dominant fibroid at 3 years to determine extents of infarction, differences in baseline characteristics, degrees of volume reduction of the uterus and fibroid, and extents of symptom change. Comparisons were performed by using t and Pearson {chi}2 tests. Differences in proportions, with 95% CIs, were calculated. Each follow-up MR image was also evaluated for the presence of myometrial perfusion defects and new fibroids.

RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients calculated for the two readers (range, 0.974–0.995) and with the MR imaging data (range, 0.966–0.988) were high. Of the 17 patients included in the outcome analysis, the 12 with complete fibroid infarction were more likely not to have enhancing lesions at 3-year follow-up (P = .002) than were those with incomplete infarction. No significant differences in volume or symptom changes between the two groups were detected, but growth of residual perfused portions of the incompletely infarcted fibroids was seen in three patients, two of whom had recurrent symptoms. Four patients developed new fibroids, none of which has caused symptoms. There were no instances of myometrial infarction.

CONCLUSION: Although the small study population prevented the drawing of definitive conclusions, the data suggest that although incomplete fibroid infarction may not affect outcome immediately, regrowth of uninfarcted fibroid tissue may result in symptom recurrence.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Arteries, therapeutic embolization, 854.1264, 854.1266 • Uterine neoplasms, 854.315 • Uterine neoplasms, MR, 854.121411, 854.121412, 854.121416, 854.12143 • Uterine neoplasms, therapy, 854.1264, 854.1266




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Z. M. Lenard, N. J. McDannold, F. M. Fennessy, E. A. Stewart, F. A. Jolesz, K. Hynynen, and C. M. C. Tempany
Uterine Leiomyomas: MR Imaging-guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery--Imaging Predictors of Success
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 187 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
G. Tropeano, S. Amoroso, and G. Scambia
Non-surgical management of uterine fibroids
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2008; 14(3): 259 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
A N Keeling and J F Reidy
Imaging and treatment of uterine fibroids, including the role of uterine artery embolization
Imaging, December 1, 2007; 19(4): 374 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Recaldini, G. Carrafiello, D. Lagana, S. Cuffari, V. Bergamini, F. Ghezzi, and C. Fugazzola
Percutaneous Sonographically Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Medium-Sized Fibroids: Feasibility Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1303 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. M. White, F. Banovac, S. Yousefi, R. S. Slack, and J. B. Spies
Uterine Fibroid Embolization: The Utility of Aortography in Detecting Ovarian Artery Collateral Supply
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 291 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. M. Fennessy, C. M. Tempany, N. J. McDannold, M. J. So, G. Hesley, B. Gostout, H. S. Kim, G. A. Holland, D. A. Sarti, K. Hynynen, et al.
Uterine Leiomyomas: MR Imaging-guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery--Results of Different Treatment Protocols
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 885 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
K. Hald, N.-E. Klow, E. Qvigstad, and O. Istre
Laparoscopic Occlusion Compared With Embolization of Uterine Vessels: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Obstet. Gynecol., January 1, 2007; 109(1): 20 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. L. Spielmann, C. Keogh, B. B. Forster, M. L. Martin, and L. S. Machan
Comparison of MRI and sonography in the preliminary evaluation for fibroid embolization.
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1499 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. J. Kroencke, C. Scheurig, C. Kluner, M. Taupitz, J. Schnorr, and B. Hamm
Uterine Fibroids: Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography to Predict Ovarian Artery Supply--Initial Experience
Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 181 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. B. Spies
Adding to our understanding of uterine fibroid embolization.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 846 - 847.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Katsumori, T. Kasahara, and K. Akazawa
Long-term outcomes of uterine artery embolization using gelatin sponge particles alone for symptomatic fibroids.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 848 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
J. B. Spies, J. Bruno, F. Czeyda-Pommersheim, S. T. Magee, S. A. Ascher, and R. C. Jha
Long-Term Outcome of Uterine Artery Embolization of Leiomyomata
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2005; 106(5): 933 - 939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J.-P. Pelage, J. Cazejust, E. Pluot, O. L. Dref, A. Laurent, J. B. Spies, S. Chagnon, and P. Lacombe
Uterine Fibroid Vascularization and Clinical Relevance to Uterine Fibroid Embolization
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2005; 25(suppl_1): S99 - S117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
Y. Kitamura, S. M. Ascher, C. Cooper, S. J. Allison, R. C. Jha, P. A. Flick, and J. B. Spies
Imaging Manifestations of Complications Associated with Uterine Artery Embolization
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2005; 25(suppl_1): S119 - S132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Ghai, D. K. Rajan, M. S. Benjamin, M. R. Asch, and S. Ghai
Uterine Artery Embolization for Leiomyomas: Pre- and Postprocedural Evaluation with US
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1159 - 1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. B. Spies, D. K. Rajan, and M. R. Asch
Invited Commentary * Authors' Response
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1173 - 1176.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.