Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 27, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2311030017
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2311030017v1
231/1/101    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, J.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ward, J.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. J.
(Radiology 2004;231:101-108.)
© RSNA, 2004


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Bile Duct Strictures after Hepatobiliary Surgery: Assessment with MR Cholangiography1

Janice Ward, MSc, DCR, Maria B. Sheridan, BA, MB, MRCP, FRCR, J. Ashley Guthrie, BA, MB, MRCP, FRCR, Mervyn H. Davies, MD, FRCP, Charles E. Millson, MD, MRCP, J. Peter A. Lodge, MD, FRCS, Stephen G. Pollard, MA, MS, FRCS, Kondragunta R. Prasad, MB, MS, FRCS, Giles J. Toogood, MA, DM, FRCS and Philip J. Robinson, MB, BS, FRCP, FRCR

1 From the MRI Department, Clinical Radiology (J.W., M.B.S., J.A.G., P.J.R.) and Hepatobiliary and Transplant Unit (M.H.D., C.E.M., J.P.A.L., S.G.P., K.R.P., G.J.T.), St James’s University Hospital, Beckett St, Leeds LS9 7TF, England. Received January 20, 2003; revision requested April 11; final revision received August 15; accepted September 29. Address correspondence to J.W. (e-mail: janice.ward@leedsth.nhs.uk).

PURPOSE: To establish the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography for diagnosis of postsurgical bile duct strictures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven patients suspected of having bile duct strictures after liver transplantation (n = 54), cholecystectomy (n = 8), hepatic resection (n = 4), or pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 1) underwent MR cholangiography. Thick-slab single-shot fast spin-echo (repetition time msec/echo time msec, 4,500/940) imaging was performed in the coronal through sagittal planes with rotation in 10° increments, and contiguous thin-section images were obtained in the transverse and the optimal coronal oblique planes by using half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (1,900/96). Three blinded observers independently reviewed the MR images and recorded diagnostic features including presence of biliary stricture by using a five-point confidence scale. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to measure the accuracy of MR cholangiography. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Final diagnosis was established at surgery (n = 29) and direct cholangiography (23 of 29) or at direct cholangiography, liver biopsy, and/or serial liver function tests (n = 38).

RESULTS: Thirty-three of 67 patients had strictures confirmed with the reference standard. MR cholangiography enabled correct diagnosis and depicted the site of strictures in all cases. Findings of stricture at MR cholangiography were false-positive in five patients with moderate duct dilatation and caliber change at the level of the anastomosis. Mean accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 94%, 97%, 74%, 86%, and 96%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: MR cholangiography is as sensitive as direct cholangiography for the assessment of bile duct strictures after hepatobiliary surgery but may lead to overestimation of the importance of duct dilatation and caliber change.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Bile ducts, MR, 76.121419 • Bile ducts, stenosis or obstruction, 76.453, 76.458 • Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), 76.1222 • Magnetic resonance (MR), cholangiopancreatography, 76.121419




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
O. A. Catalano, D. V. Sahani, S. P. Kalva, M. S. Cushing, P. F. Hahn, J. J. Brown, and R. R. Edelman
MR Imaging of the Gallbladder: A Pictorial Essay
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 135 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. H. M. Caiado, R. Blasbalg, A. S. Z. Marcelino, M. da Cunha Pinho, M. C. Chammas, C. da Costa Leite, G. G. Cerri, A. C. de Oliveira, T. Bacchella, and M. C. C. Machado
Complications of Liver Transplantation: Multimodality Imaging Approach
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2007; 27(5): 1401 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. Hoeffel, L. Azizi, M. Lewin, V. Laurent, C. Aube, L. Arrive, and J.-M. Tubiana
Normal and Pathologic Features of the Postoperative Biliary Tract at 3D MR Cholangiopancreatography and MR Imaging
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1603 - 1620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.