HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2311030036v1 231/1/117    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kim, S. Articles by Lim, J. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kim, S. Articles by Lim, J. H.

Depiction and Local Staging of Rectal Tumors: Comparison of Transrectal US before and after Water Instillation¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul 135–710, Korea. From the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received January 9, 2003; revision requested March 20; final revision received August 7; accepted September 29. Address correspondence to H.K.L. (e-mail: hklim@smc.samsung.co.kr).

PURPOSE: To determine whether transrectal ultrasonography (US) with intrarectal water instillation can improve the depiction and accuracy of US in local staging of rectal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 1999 and February 2002, 63 patients (mean age, 56 years; age range, 23–91 years) with 63 rectal tumors were evaluated with transrectal US before and after intrarectal water instillation. Transrectal US examinations were performed with a 7–10-MHz radial transducer. Immediately after the first transrectal US examination, the rectal lumen was filled with 50–150 mL of degassed water, and a second US examination was performed. All patients underwent surgery within 1 month after transrectal US. Depiction of the tumor was compared between the two methods. The McNemar test was used to compare the accuracy between the two techniques in local staging of the tumor by using pathologic findings in the resected specimen as the standard.

RESULTS: The tumors ranged from 0.5 to 8.0 cm (mean, 2.8 cm) as measured at pathologic evaluation. All 63 tumors were clearly depicted at transrectal US after water instillation, while only 42 (67%) of the tumors were depicted at transrectal US before water instillation. In the 42 tumors clearly depicted at transrectal US examinations both before and after water instillation, the accuracy of transrectal US in local tumor staging was significantly higher after water instillation (85.7% [36 of 42]) than before water instillation (57.1% [24 of 42]; P < .001).

CONCLUSION: Water instillation during transrectal US examination of rectal tumors improves the depiction and local staging of the tumors.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Neoplasms, staging, 757.32 • Rectum, neoplasms, 757.32 • Rectum, US, 757.12988 • Ultrasound (US), contrast media • Ultrasound (US), technology

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Berton, G. Gola, and S. R. Wilson Perspective on the Role of Transrectal and Transvaginal Sonography of Tumors of the Rectum and Anal Canal Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1495 - 1504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-K. Chun, D. Choi, M. J. Kim, J. Lee, S. H. Yun, S. H. Kim, S. J. Lee, and C. K. Kim Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography. Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1557 - 1562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]