|
|
||||||||
Nuclear Medicine |
1 From the Departments of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine Service (H.S., H.W.D.Y., S.M.L.), Biostatistics (M.G.), and Surgery, Head and Neck Service (D.K.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Box 77, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021. From the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 18, 2003; revision requested May 2; final revision received July 10; accepted September 29. Address correspondence to H.S. (e-mail: schoderh@mskcc.org).
PURPOSE: To compare diagnostic accuracy of attenuation-corrected positron emission tomography (PET) with fused PET and computed tomography (CT) in patients with head and neck cancer and to evaluate the effect of PET/CT findings on patient care.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies of 68 patients were reviewed by two physicians in consensus. Focal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the head and neck on attenuation-corrected PET images was graded as benign, equivocal, or malignant. CT and PET/CT images were then reviewed, and initial findings were amended if necessary. Comparison was performed on a lesion-by-lesion basis. Accuracy was evaluated on the basis of follow-up and histopathologic findings. Potential effects on patient care were assessed by a head and neck surgeon. PET and PET/CT accuracy was compared with a McNemar test adjusted for clustering.
RESULTS: A total of 157 foci with abnormal FDG uptake were noted, two of which were seen only on PET/CT images. PET/CT images were essential in determining the exact anatomic location for 100 lesions (74% better localization in regions previously treated surgically or with irradiation vs 58% in untreated areas; P = .06). On the basis of PET findings alone, 45 lesions were considered benign; 39, equivocal; and 71, malignant. With PET/CT, the fraction of equivocal lesions decreased by 53%, from 39 of 155 to 18 of 157 (P < .01). PET/CT had a higher accuracy of depicting cancer than did PET (96% vs 90%, P = .03). Six proved malignancies were missed with PET, but only one was missed with PET/CT. PET/CT findings altered the care for 12 (18%) of 68 patients.
CONCLUSION: PET/CT is more accurate than PET alone in the detection and anatomic localization of head and neck cancer and has the clear potential to affect patient care.
© RSNA, 2004
Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), 20.12111, 20.12115 Dual-modality imaging, PET/CT Head and neck neoplasms, 20.32, 20.33 Images, fusion Positron emission tomography (PET), 20.12163, 20.12166
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Schoder, M. Fury, N. Lee, and D. Kraus PET Monitoring of Therapy Response in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 74S - 88S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Scott, D. H. Gunawardana, D. Bartholomeusz, J. E. Ramshaw, and P. Lin PET Changes Management and Improves Prognostic Stratification in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Prospective Study J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 1593 - 1600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Baek, M. K. Chung, Y.-I. Son, J. Y. Choi, H.-J. Kim, Y. J. Yim, Y. H. Ko, J. Choi, J. K. Cho, and H.-S. Jeong Tumor Volume Assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Oral Cavity Cancer with Dental Artifacts on CT or MR Images J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 1422 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nakagawa, M. Yamada, and Y. Suzuki 18F-FDG Uptake in Reactive Neck Lymph Nodes of Oral Cancer: Relationship to Lymphoid Follicles J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1053 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Ong, H. Schoder, N. Y. Lee, S. G. Patel, D. Carlson, M. Fury, D. G. Pfister, J. P. Shah, S. M. Larson, and D. H. Kraus Clinical Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Assessing the Neck After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional Advanced Head and Neck Cancer J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2008; 49(4): 532 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Fletcher, B. Djulbegovic, H. P. Soares, B. A. Siegel, V. J. Lowe, G. H. Lyman, R. E. Coleman, R. Wahl, J. C. Paschold, N. Avril, et al. Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 480 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 333 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Basu, B. A. Siegel, D. J. McDonald, and B. Nussenbaum Detection of Occult Bone Metastases From Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography With Fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, August 1, 2007; 133(8): 801 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. G. Schaefer, C. Taverna, K. Strobel, C. Wastl, M. Kurrer, and T. F. Hany Hodgkin Disease: Diagnostic Value of FDG PET/CT after First-Line Therapy--Is Biopsy of FDG-avid Lesions Still Needed? Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 257 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S.P. Meirelles, Y. E. Erdi, S. A. Nehmeh, O. D. Squire, S. M. Larson, J. L. Humm, and H. Schoder Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold PET/CT: Clinical Findings with a New Technique for Detection and Characterization of Thoracic Lesions J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 712 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schoder and M. Gonen Screening for Cancer with PET and PET/CT: Potential and Limitations J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 4S - 18S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Israel and A. Kuten Early Detection of Cancer Recurrence: 18F-FDG PET/CT Can Make a Difference in Diagnosis and Patient Care J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 28S - 35S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Czernin, M. Allen-Auerbach, and H. R. Schelbert Improvements in Cancer Staging with PET/CT: Literature-Based Evidence as of September 2006 J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 78S - 88S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Choi, W. K. Moon, J. H. Hong, K. R. Son, N. Cho, B. J. Kwon, J. J. Lee, J.-K. Chung, H. S. Min, and S. H. Park Lymph Node Metastasis: Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-enhanced MR Imaging versus PET/CT in a Rabbit Model Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 137 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Newbold, M Partridge, G Cook, S A Sohaib, E Charles-Edwards, P Rhys-Evans, K Harrington, and C Nutting Advanced imaging applied to radiotherapy planning in head and neck cancer: a clinical review. Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2006; 79(943): 554 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schoder, D. L. Carlson, D. H. Kraus, H. E. Stambuk, M. Gonen, Y. E. Erdi, H. W.D. Yeung, A. G. Huvos, J. P. Shah, S. M. Larson, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for Detecting Nodal Metastases in Patients with Oral Cancer Staged N0 by Clinical Examination and CT/MRI J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2006; 47(5): 755 - 762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. K. von Schulthess, H. C. Steinert, and T. F. Hany Integrated PET/CT: Current Applications and Future Directions Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 405 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A G Schreyer and R Kikinis Combined PET/CT colonography: is this the way forward? Gut, January 1, 2006; 55(1): 10 - 12. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. Ha, A. Hdeib, D. Goldenberg, H. Jacene, P. Patel, W. Koch, J. Califano, C. W. Cummings, P. W. Flint, R. Wahl, et al. The Role of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Fusion in the Management of Early-Stage and Advanced-Stage Primary Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, January 1, 2006; 132(1): 12 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schoder, H. W.D. Yeung, and S. M. Larson CT in PET/CT: Essential Features of Interpretation J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1249 - 1251. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-H. Ng, T.-C. Yen, C.-T. Liao, J. T.-C. Chang, S.-C. Chan, S.-F. Ko, H.-M. Wang, and H.-F. Wong 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Study of 124 Patients with Histologic Correlation J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1136 - 1143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Mau, Y. Oh, M. K. Bucci, and D. W. Eisele Management of Cervical Metastases in Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tonsillar Fossa Following Radiotherapy Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, July 1, 2005; 131(7): 600 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. R. Miller, D. Hussey, M. Beeram, T. Eng, H. S. McGuff, and R. A. Otto Positron Emission Tomography in the Management of Unknown Primary Head and Neck Carcinoma Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, July 1, 2005; 131(7): 626 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. F. Branstetter IV, T. M. Blodgett, L. A. Zimmer, C. H. Snyderman, J. T. Johnson, S. Raman, and C. C. Meltzer Head and Neck Malignancy: Is PET/CT More Accurate than PET or CT Alone? Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 580 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Kelloff, J. M. Hoffman, B. Johnson, H. I. Scher, B. A. Siegel, E. Y. Cheng, B. D. Cheson, J. O'Shaughnessy, K. Z. Guyton, D. A. Mankoff, et al. Progress and Promise of FDG-PET Imaging for Cancer Patient Management and Oncologic Drug Development Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 11(8): 2785 - 2808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Kim, J. Czernin, M. S. Allen-Auerbach, B. S. Halpern, B. J. Fueger, J. R. Hecht, O. Ratib, M. E. Phelps, and W. A. Weber Comparison Between 18F-FDG PET, In-Line PET/CT, and Software Fusion for Restaging of Recurrent Colorectal Cancer J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 587 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Kapoor, M. B. Fukui, and B. M. McCook Role of 18FFDG PET/CT in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers: Posttherapy Evaluation and Pitfalls Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 589 - 597. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||