Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 27, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2311030271
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2311030271v1
231/1/65    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schöder, H.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schöder, H.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, S. M.
(Radiology 2004;231:65-72.)
© RSNA, 2004


Nuclear Medicine

Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical Usefulness and Accuracy of PET/CT Image Fusion1

Heiko Schöder, MD, Henry W. D. Yeung, MD, Mithat Gonen, PhD, Dennis Kraus, MD and Steven M. Larson, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine Service (H.S., H.W.D.Y., S.M.L.), Biostatistics (M.G.), and Surgery, Head and Neck Service (D.K.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Box 77, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021. From the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 18, 2003; revision requested May 2; final revision received July 10; accepted September 29. Address correspondence to H.S. (e-mail: schoderh@mskcc.org).

PURPOSE: To compare diagnostic accuracy of attenuation-corrected positron emission tomography (PET) with fused PET and computed tomography (CT) in patients with head and neck cancer and to evaluate the effect of PET/CT findings on patient care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies of 68 patients were reviewed by two physicians in consensus. Focal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the head and neck on attenuation-corrected PET images was graded as benign, equivocal, or malignant. CT and PET/CT images were then reviewed, and initial findings were amended if necessary. Comparison was performed on a lesion-by-lesion basis. Accuracy was evaluated on the basis of follow-up and histopathologic findings. Potential effects on patient care were assessed by a head and neck surgeon. PET and PET/CT accuracy was compared with a McNemar test adjusted for clustering.

RESULTS: A total of 157 foci with abnormal FDG uptake were noted, two of which were seen only on PET/CT images. PET/CT images were essential in determining the exact anatomic location for 100 lesions (74% better localization in regions previously treated surgically or with irradiation vs 58% in untreated areas; P = .06). On the basis of PET findings alone, 45 lesions were considered benign; 39, equivocal; and 71, malignant. With PET/CT, the fraction of equivocal lesions decreased by 53%, from 39 of 155 to 18 of 157 (P < .01). PET/CT had a higher accuracy of depicting cancer than did PET (96% vs 90%, P = .03). Six proved malignancies were missed with PET, but only one was missed with PET/CT. PET/CT findings altered the care for 12 (18%) of 68 patients.

CONCLUSION: PET/CT is more accurate than PET alone in the detection and anatomic localization of head and neck cancer and has the clear potential to affect patient care.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), 20.12111, 20.12115 • Dual-modality imaging, PET/CT • Head and neck neoplasms, 20.32, 20.33 • Images, fusion • Positron emission tomography (PET), 20.12163, 20.12166




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
H. Schoder, M. Fury, N. Lee, and D. Kraus
PET Monitoring of Therapy Response in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2009; 50(Suppl_1): 74S - 88S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. M. Scott, D. H. Gunawardana, D. Bartholomeusz, J. E. Ramshaw, and P. Lin
PET Changes Management and Improves Prognostic Stratification in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Prospective Study
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 1593 - 1600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C.-H. Baek, M. K. Chung, Y.-I. Son, J. Y. Choi, H.-J. Kim, Y. J. Yim, Y. H. Ko, J. Choi, J. K. Cho, and H.-S. Jeong
Tumor Volume Assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Oral Cavity Cancer with Dental Artifacts on CT or MR Images
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 1422 - 1428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
T. Nakagawa, M. Yamada, and Y. Suzuki
18F-FDG Uptake in Reactive Neck Lymph Nodes of Oral Cancer: Relationship to Lymphoid Follicles
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1053 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. C. Ong, H. Schoder, N. Y. Lee, S. G. Patel, D. Carlson, M. Fury, D. G. Pfister, J. P. Shah, S. M. Larson, and D. H. Kraus
Clinical Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Assessing the Neck After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2008; 49(4): 532 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. W. Fletcher, B. Djulbegovic, H. P. Soares, B. A. Siegel, V. J. Lowe, G. H. Lyman, R. E. Coleman, R. Wahl, J. C. Paschold, N. Avril, et al.
Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 480 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. J. A. Margolis, J. M. Hoffman, R. J. Herfkens, R. B. Jeffrey, A. Quon, and S. S. Gambhir
Molecular Imaging Techniques in Body Imaging
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 333 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
D. Basu, B. A. Siegel, D. J. McDonald, and B. Nussenbaum
Detection of Occult Bone Metastases From Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography With Fluorodeoxyglucose F 18
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, August 1, 2007; 133(8): 801 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. G. Schaefer, C. Taverna, K. Strobel, C. Wastl, M. Kurrer, and T. F. Hany
Hodgkin Disease: Diagnostic Value of FDG PET/CT after First-Line Therapy--Is Biopsy of FDG-avid Lesions Still Needed?
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 257 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
G. S.P. Meirelles, Y. E. Erdi, S. A. Nehmeh, O. D. Squire, S. M. Larson, J. L. Humm, and H. Schoder
Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold PET/CT: Clinical Findings with a New Technique for Detection and Characterization of Thoracic Lesions
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 712 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. Schoder and M. Gonen
Screening for Cancer with PET and PET/CT: Potential and Limitations
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 4S - 18S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
O. Israel and A. Kuten
Early Detection of Cancer Recurrence: 18F-FDG PET/CT Can Make a Difference in Diagnosis and Patient Care
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 28S - 35S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J. Czernin, M. Allen-Auerbach, and H. R. Schelbert
Improvements in Cancer Staging with PET/CT: Literature-Based Evidence as of September 2006
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1_suppl): 78S - 88S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. H. Choi, W. K. Moon, J. H. Hong, K. R. Son, N. Cho, B. J. Kwon, J. J. Lee, J.-K. Chung, H. S. Min, and S. H. Park
Lymph Node Metastasis: Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-enhanced MR Imaging versus PET/CT in a Rabbit Model
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 137 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
K Newbold, M Partridge, G Cook, S A Sohaib, E Charles-Edwards, P Rhys-Evans, K Harrington, and C Nutting
Advanced imaging applied to radiotherapy planning in head and neck cancer: a clinical review.
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2006; 79(943): 554 - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. Schoder, D. L. Carlson, D. H. Kraus, H. E. Stambuk, M. Gonen, Y. E. Erdi, H. W.D. Yeung, A. G. Huvos, J. P. Shah, S. M. Larson, et al.
18F-FDG PET/CT for Detecting Nodal Metastases in Patients with Oral Cancer Staged N0 by Clinical Examination and CT/MRI
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2006; 47(5): 755 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. K. von Schulthess, H. C. Steinert, and T. F. Hany
Integrated PET/CT: Current Applications and Future Directions
Radiology, February 1, 2006; 238(2): 405 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
A G Schreyer and R Kikinis
Combined PET/CT colonography: is this the way forward?
Gut, January 1, 2006; 55(1): 10 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
P. K. Ha, A. Hdeib, D. Goldenberg, H. Jacene, P. Patel, W. Koch, J. Califano, C. W. Cummings, P. W. Flint, R. Wahl, et al.
The Role of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Fusion in the Management of Early-Stage and Advanced-Stage Primary Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, January 1, 2006; 132(1): 12 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. Schoder, H. W.D. Yeung, and S. M. Larson
CT in PET/CT: Essential Features of Interpretation
J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1249 - 1251.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S.-H. Ng, T.-C. Yen, C.-T. Liao, J. T.-C. Chang, S.-C. Chan, S.-F. Ko, H.-M. Wang, and H.-F. Wong
18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Study of 124 Patients with Histologic Correlation
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1136 - 1143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
T. Mau, Y. Oh, M. K. Bucci, and D. W. Eisele
Management of Cervical Metastases in Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tonsillar Fossa Following Radiotherapy
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, July 1, 2005; 131(7): 600 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
F. R. Miller, D. Hussey, M. Beeram, T. Eng, H. S. McGuff, and R. A. Otto
Positron Emission Tomography in the Management of Unknown Primary Head and Neck Carcinoma
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, July 1, 2005; 131(7): 626 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. F. Branstetter IV, T. M. Blodgett, L. A. Zimmer, C. H. Snyderman, J. T. Johnson, S. Raman, and C. C. Meltzer
Head and Neck Malignancy: Is PET/CT More Accurate than PET or CT Alone?
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 580 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. J. Kelloff, J. M. Hoffman, B. Johnson, H. I. Scher, B. A. Siegel, E. Y. Cheng, B. D. Cheson, J. O'Shaughnessy, K. Z. Guyton, D. A. Mankoff, et al.
Progress and Promise of FDG-PET Imaging for Cancer Patient Management and Oncologic Drug Development
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 11(8): 2785 - 2808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
J.-H. Kim, J. Czernin, M. S. Allen-Auerbach, B. S. Halpern, B. J. Fueger, J. R. Hecht, O. Ratib, M. E. Phelps, and W. A. Weber
Comparison Between 18F-FDG PET, In-Line PET/CT, and Software Fusion for Restaging of Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 587 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
V. Kapoor, M. B. Fukui, and B. M. McCook
Role of 18FFDG PET/CT in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers: Posttherapy Evaluation and Pitfalls
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 589 - 597.
[Full Text] [PDF]