|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genitourinary Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (R.M., P. Mirk, G.M., P. Marano), Obstetrics and Gynecology (P.A.M., A.T., G.S.), Pathology (G.F.Z.), and Biomathematics (D.G.), A. Gemelli University Hospital, 8 Largo A. Gemelli, Rome 00168, Italy. From the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received September 17, 2002; revision requested November 8; final revision received August 8, 2003; accepted September 29. Address correspondence to R.M. (e-mail: rmanfredi@rm.unicatt.it).
PURPOSE: To assess magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in depicting the depth of myometrial infiltration, cervical invasion, and presence of enlarged lymph nodes in patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma compared with surgicopathologic findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients with endometrial carcinoma were included in this prospective study. All patients underwent MR imaging and surgery. Qualitative image analysis included the depth of myometrial infiltration, infiltration of the uterine cervix, and presence of enlarged lymph nodes. Quantitative image analysis included tumor and myometrium contrast-to-noise ratios during different phases of dynamic imaging. MR imaging findings were compared with surgicopathologic findings. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of MR imaging in depicting myometrial and cervical infiltration and in lymph node assessment were calculated.
RESULTS: Respective sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values in assessing myometrial infiltration were 87%, 91%, 89%, 87%, and 91%; those for cervical infiltration, 80%, 96%, 92%, 89%, and 93%; and those for lymph node assessment, 50%, 95%, 90%, 50%, and 95%. There was significant agreement between MR imaging and surgicopathologic findings in assessment of myometrial invasion (P < .001). Myometrial and cervical invasion and lymph node enlargement were correctly assessed with MR imaging in 28 (76%) of 37 patients. Quantitative analysis showed a significant improvement in tumor and myometrium contrast-to-noise ratios during the equilibrium phase compared with the arterial and precontrast phases (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: MR imaging coupled with contrast materialenhanced dynamic MR imaging is highly accurate in local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma; more challenging is the assessment of pelvic and lumboaortic lymph nodes.
© RSNA, 2004
Index terms: Uterine neoplasms, MR, 854.121411, 854.121412, 854.121416, 854.12143 Uterine neoplasms, staging, 854.32 Uterus, endometrium, 854.32
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Lin, K.-K. Ng, C.-J. Chang, J.-J. Wang, K.-C. Ho, T.-C. Yen, T.-I Wu, C.-C. Wang, Y.-R. Chen, Y.-T. Huang, et al. Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer: Diagnostic Accuracy of Diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR Imaging--Initial Experience Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 784 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Alcazar, R. Galvan, S. Albela, S. Martinez, J. Pahisa, M. Jurado, and G. Lopez-Garcia Assessing Myometrial Infiltration by Endometrial Cancer: Uterine Virtual Navigation with Three-dimensional US Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 776 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kitajima, K. Murakami, E. Yamasaki, I. Fukasawa, N. Inaba, Y. Kaji, and K. Sugimura Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Detecting Pelvic and Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Endometrial Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1652 - 1658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-H. Shen, Y.-Y. Chiou, J.-H. Wang, M.-S. Yen, R.-C. Lee, C.-R. Lai, and C.-Y. Chang Diffusion-Weighted Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging with Parallel Technique in Assessment of Endometrial Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 481 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Torricelli, S. Ferraresi, F. Fiocchi, G. Ligabue, V. M. Jasonni, I. Di Monte, and F. Rivasi 3-T MRI in the Preoperative Evaluation of Depth of Myometrial Infiltration in Endometrial Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 489 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Delpech, A. Cortez, C. Coutant, P. Callard, S. Uzan, E. Darai, and E. Barranger The sentinel node concept in endometrial cancer: histopathologic validation by serial section and immunohistochemistry Ann. Onc., November 1, 2007; 18(11): 1799 - 1803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sala, S. Wakely, E. Senior, and D. Lomas MRI of Malignant Neoplasms of the Uterine Corpus and Cervix Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1577 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Sahdev Imaging the endometrium in postmenopausal bleeding BMJ, March 24, 2007; 334(7594): 635 - 636. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||