Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print March 24, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2312030835
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2312030835v1
231/2/407    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ha, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Herlinger, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ha, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Herlinger, H.
(Radiology 2004;231:407-412.)
© RSNA, 2004


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Radiographic Examination of the Small Bowel: Survey of Practice Patterns in the United States1

Alice S. Ha, MD, Marc S. Levine, MD, Stephen E. Rubesin, MD, Igor Laufer, MD and Hans Herlinger, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Received June 4, 2003; revision requested August 14; revision received September 22; accepted October 22. Address correspondence to M.S.L. (e-mail: marc.levine@uphs.upenn.edu).

PURPOSE: To obtain understanding of the current practice patterns of academic and private radiology groups in the United States in radiographic examination of the small bowel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The survey consisted of questions about small-bowel follow-through (SBFT) examinations, including frequency of overhead radiographs, use of fluoroscopic spot images, personnel performing fluoroscopy, practice settings, and degree of specialization. By using a standard sampling technique, the country was divided into nine regions, and one state from each region was randomly selected. The survey was mailed to 452 full-time chief technologists. The responses were tabulated, and statistical analysis of the data was performed with the {chi}2 test.

RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 236 (52%) of 452 chief technologists; 219 (93%) respondents, 176 (80%) in private and 43 (20%) in academic groups, indicated that their group performed SBFT studies. The studies were performed by general radiologists in 205 (94%) of the 219 groups and by gastrointestinal or abdominal radiologists in 11 (5%). Studies included overhead radiographs in all 219 groups, with spot images of the terminal ileum in 201 (92%). Thirty (14%) of 219 groups routinely obtained spot images of the remaining small bowel, 104 (48%) obtained spot images only if there were questionable findings on overhead radiographs, and 82 (37%) obtained no spot images. Eighteen (8%) of 219 groups performed peroral pneumocolon examinations and 80 (37%) performed enteroclysis.

CONCLUSION: The majority of radiology groups perform SBFT studies. Regardless of the practice setting, these studies usually consist of a series of overhead radiographs, with routine spot images of the terminal ileum but not of the remaining small bowel. This approach may need to be reassessed in light of the American College of Radiology standards that all accessible small-bowel loops be visualized at fluoroscopy with representative radiographs to optimize the diagnostic yield of the examination.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Intestines, radiography, 74.1271 • Radiologic Technologists • Radiology and radiologists




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. S. Levine, S. E. Rubesin, and I. Laufer
Pattern Approach for Diseases of Mesenteric Small Bowel on Barium Studies
Radiology, November 1, 2008; 249(2): 445 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. M. Kessler, M. S. Levine, S. E. Rubesin, J. L. Rombeau, and I. Laufer
Accuracy of Retrograde Ileostomy Radiographic Examination for Detecting Small-Bowel Abnormalities
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 353 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. R. Paulsen, J. E. Huprich, J. G. Fletcher, F. Booya, B. M. Young, J. L. Fidler, C. D. Johnson, J. M. Barlow, and F. Earnest IV
CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases.
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2006; 26(3): 641 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. D. T. Maglinte and J. E. Huprich
Invited Commentary * Author's Response.
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2006; 26(3): 657 - 662.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. M. Zafar, M. S. Levine, S. E. Rubesin, and I. Laufer
Anterior abdominal wall hernias: findings in barium studies.
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2006; 26(3): 691 - 699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. D. T. Maglinte
Capsule Imaging and the Role of Radiology in the Investigation of Diseases of the Small Bowel
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 763 - 767.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. D. T. Maglinte
Invited Commentary
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2005; 25(3): 711 - 718.
[Full Text] [PDF]