Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print March 24, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2312030451
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2312030451v1
231/2/581    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spuentrup, E.
Right arrow Articles by Günther, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spuentrup, E.
Right arrow Articles by Günther, R. W.
(Radiology 2004;231:581-586.)
© RSNA, 2004


Technical Developments

Free-breathing 3D Steady-State Free Precession Coronary MR Angiography with Radial k-Space Sampling: Comparison with Cartesian k-Space Sampling and Cartesian Gradient-Echo Coronary MR Angiography—Pilot Study1

Elmar Spuentrup, MD, Marcus Katoh, MD, Arno Buecker, MD, Warren J. Manning, MD, Tobias Schaeffter, PhD, Trung-Hieu Nguyen, Harald P. Kühl, MD, Matthias Stuber, PhD, Rene M. Botnar, PhD and Rolf W. Günther, MD

1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (E.S., M.K., A.B., T.H.N., R.W.G.) and Medical Clinic I (H.P.K.), University Hospital, Aachen University of Technology, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52057 Aachen, Germany; Departments of Medicine (Cardiovascular Division) (E.S., M.S., R.M.B., W.J.M.) and Radiology (W.J.M.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; Philips Research Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany (T.S.); and Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands (M.S., R.M.B.). Received March 23, 2003; revision requested May 28; final revision received August 12; accepted September 8. Address correspondence to E.S. (e-mail: spuenti@rad.rwth-aachen.de).

The authors compared radial steady-state free precession (SSFP) coronary magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, cartesian k-space sampling SSFP coronary MR angiography, and gradient-echo coronary MR angiography in 16 healthy adults and four pilot study patients. Standard gradient-echo MR imaging with a T2 preparatory pulse and cartesian k-space sampling was the reference technique. Image quality was compared by using subjective motion artifact level and objective contrast-to-noise ratio and vessel sharpness. Radial SSFP, compared with cartesian SSFP and gradient-echo MR angiography, resulted in reduced motion artifacts and superior vessel sharpness. Cartesian SSFP resulted in increased motion artifacts (P < .05). Contrast-to-noise ratio with radial SSFP was lower than that with cartesian SSFP and similar to that with the reference technique. Radial SSFP coronary MR angiography appears preferable because of improved definition of vessel borders.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Coronary angiography, comparative studies, 54.121412, 54.121415, 54.121416, 54.12142, 54.12149 • Coronary vessels, MR, 54.12142 • Magnetic resonance (MR), k-space • Magnetic resonance (MR), motion correction • Magnetic resonance (MR), three-dimensional




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Miyazaki and V. S. Lee
Nonenhanced MR Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 20 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
W. Y. Kim, A. S. Astrup, M. Stuber, L. Tarnow, E. Falk, R. M. Botnar, C. Simonsen, L. Pietraszek, P. R. Hansen, W. J. Manning, et al.
Subclinical Coronary and Aortic Atherosclerosis Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Type 1 Diabetes With and Without Diabetic Nephropathy
Circulation, January 16, 2007; 115(2): 228 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. M. Bansmann, A. N. Priest, K. Muellerleile, A. Stork, G. K. Lund, M. G. Kaul, and G. Adam
MRI of the Coronary Vessel Wall at 3 T: Comparison of Radial and Cartesian k-Space Sampling
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 70 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. Sakuma, Y. Ichikawa, S. Chino, T. Hirano, K. Makino, and K. Takeda
Detection of Coronary Artery Stenosis With Whole-Heart Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 1946 - 1950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Katoh, E. Spuentrup, A. Buecker, T. Schaeffter, M. Stuber, R. W. Gunther, and R. M. Botnar
MRI of Coronary Vessel Walls Using Radial k-Space Sampling and Steady-State Free Precession Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6_Supplement_2): S401 - S406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. U. Herborn, D. M. Watkins, V. M. Runge, J. M. Gendron, M. L. Montgomery, and L. G. Naul
Renal Arteries: Comparison of Steady-State Free Precession MR Angiography and Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 263 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. Fuster, Z. A. Fayad, P. R. Moreno, M. Poon, R. Corti, and J. J. Badimon
Atherothrombosis and High-Risk Plaque: Part II: Approaches by Noninvasive Computed Tomographic/Magnetic Resonance Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 4, 2005; 46(7): 1209 - 1218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Katoh, M. Stuber, A. Buecker, R. W. Gunther, and E. Spuentrup
Spin-labeling Coronary MR Angiography with Steady-State Free Precession and Radial k-Space Sampling: Initial Results in Healthy Volunteers
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 1047 - 1052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. J. Riederer
Coronary Artery MR Angiography: Are We There Yet?
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 302 - 304.
[Full Text] [PDF]