Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 29, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2313021253
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2313021253v1
231/3/725    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K.-S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, K.-S.
(Radiology 2004;231:725-731.)
© RSNA, 2004


Genitourinary Imaging

Bladder Cancer: Analysis of Multi–Detector Row Helical CT Enhancement Pattern and Accuracy in Tumor Detection and Perivesical Staging1

Jeong Kon Kim, MD, Soo-Youn Park, MD, Han Jong Ahn, MD, Chung Soo Kim, MD and Kyoung-Sik Cho, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (J.K.K., S.Y.P., K.S.C.) and Urology (C.S.K., H.J.A.), Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, 388–1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138–736, Korea. Received October 1, 2002; revision requested December 12; final revision received September 24, 2003; accepted October 28. Address correspondence to K.S.C. (e-mail: kscho@amc.seoul.kr).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the enhancement pattern of bladder cancer and the accuracy of multi–detector row helical computed tomography (CT) in the detection and staging of bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 20 patients, the attenuation value of bladder cancer was measured on dynamic contrast material–enhanced multiphasic CT images obtained with scanning delays of 40, 60, 80, and 100 seconds. In 67 patients, CT data were obtained with a 60-second scanning delay that covered the bladder (section thickness, 2.5 mm; beam pitch, 1.5) and a 180-second scanning delay that covered the abdomen (section thickness, 5 mm; beam pitch, 1.5). We prospectively evaluated CT images and compared findings at CT with findings at histologic examination. We evaluated cancer detection rate, positive predictive value of cancer detection, and sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of perivesical invasion.

RESULTS: The attenuation value of bladder cancers was significantly higher on 60- (105 HU ± 16) and 80-second (97 HU ± 15) delayed CT images than on the other images (P < .05). The cancer detection rate and positive predictive value for cancer detection were 97% and 95%, respectively, in 67 patients and increased to 100% and 100%, respectively, in 44 patients with a time interval of 7 or more days between transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) and CT examination. Sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of perivesical invasion were 89% and 95%, respectively, in 67 patients and increased to 92% and 98%, respectively, in 44 patients with a time interval of 7 or more days between TURB and CT examination.

CONCLUSION: Bladder cancer tends to show peak enhancement with the 60-second scanning delay. Multi–detector row helical CT is useful in the detection and staging of bladder cancer.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Bladder neoplasms, 83.32 • Bladder neoplasms, CT, 83.12115, 83.12112 • Computed tomography (CT), contrast enhancement, 83.12112 • Computed tomography (CT), multi–detector row, 83.12115




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. A. Sadow, S. G. Silverman, M. P. O'Leary, and J. E. Signorovitch
Bladder Cancer Detection with CT Urography in an Academic Medical Center
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 195 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
N Bharwani, N J Stephens, and S D Heenan
Imaging of bladder cancer
Imaging, June 1, 2008; 20(2): 97 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. B. Park, J. K. Kim, H. J. Lee, H. J. Choi, and K.-S. Cho
Hematuria: Portal Venous Phase Multi Detector Row CT of the Bladder A Prospective Study
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 798 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Jinzaki, A. Tanimoto, H. Shinmoto, Y. Horiguchi, K. Sato, S. Kuribayashi, and S. G. Silverman
Detection of Bladder Tumors with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 913 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. J. Wong-You-Cheong, P. J. Woodward, M. A. Manning, and I. A. Sesterhenn
From the Archives of the AFIP: Neoplasms of the Urinary Bladder: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2006; 26(2): 553 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. J. Matta, A. J. Kenney, G. M. Barre, and R. M. Vanlangendonck Jr
Best Cases from the AFIP: Intradiverticular Bladder Carcinoma
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1397 - 1403.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.