HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pijl, M. E. J. Articles by Bloem, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pijl, M. E. J. Articles by Bloem, J. L.

Quantitative Analysis of Focal Masses at MR Imaging: A Plea for Standardization¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (M.E.J.P., J.D., M.N.J.M.W., J.L.B.), Medical Statistics (H.C.v.H.), and Surgery (R.A.E.M.T.), Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands. Received February 3, 2003; revision requested April 22; final revision received November 9; accepted November 10. Address correspondence to M.E.J.P. (e-mail: m.e.j.pijl@lumc.nl).

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of changing analytic method variables on the signal intensity (SI) difference–to-noise ratios (SDNRs) for the contrast between lesions and background organs depicted on magnetic resonance (MR) images and to propose a standardized analytic method for the quantitative analysis of focal masses seen at MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SIs of 48 liver metastases (originating from colorectal cancer) in 20 patients, the surrounding liver parenchyma, and the background noise were measured on T2-weighted MR images. All 2000 and 2001 issues of the American Journal of Roentgenology, the Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Radiology were searched for articles describing quantitative analyses. SDNRs were calculated by using formulas from these articles and various region-of-interest (ROI) locations to measure metastasis and background noise SIs. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the various SDNR calculations.

RESULTS: In 34 articles in which quantitative analyses of focal masses are described, the reported SDNRs were calculated with four different formulas. The SDNRs for our study material calculated with the four formulas reported in the literature differed grossly in both number and unit. The SDNRs for ROIs encompassing the entire metastasis differed significantly (P = .034) from the SDNRs for ROIs in a homogeneous area of the metastasis margin. Differences in SDNRs between various noise ROI locations were significant (P < .022).

CONCLUSION: Slight changes in the variables of quantitative analysis of focal masses had marked effects on reported SDNRs. To overcome these effects, the use of a standardized method involving one formula, a lesion ROI in a homogeneous area at the metastasis margin, and a background noise ROI along the phase-encoding axis in the air (including systematic noise) is proposed for the quantitative analysis of findings on magnitude MR images.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Data analysis • Liver neoplasms, 75.33, 76.32, 76.33 • Liver neoplasms, metastases, 75.33, 76.33 • Liver neoplasms, MR, 76.121411, 76.121416, 76.12146 • Magnetic resonance (MR), tissue characterization, 76.12146

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. B. Siegel, E. I. Cohen, A. Ocean, D. Lehrer, A. Goldenberg, J. J. Knox, H. Chen, S. Clark-Garvey, A. Weinberg, J. Mandeli, et al. Phase II Trial Evaluating the Clinical and Biologic Effects of Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2008; 26(18): 2992 - 2998. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D P O'Regan, J Fitzgerald, J Allsop, D Gibson, D J Larkman, D Cokkinos, J V Hajnal, and S A Schmitz A comparison of MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(934): 894 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Merkle, S. G. Nour, and J. S. Lewin MR Imaging Follow-up after Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Findings in 18 Patients during First 6 Months Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 1065 - 1071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]