| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Emergency Radiology |
1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (K.S., S.E.M., K.L.K., G.J.F.H.) and Maryland Shock-Trauma Center (K.S., S.E.M., W.C.C., T.M.S.), University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201. From the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 6, 2003; revision requested April 2; final revision received August 4; accepted September 29. Address correspondence to K.S. (e-mail: kshanmuganathan@umm.edu).
PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) in demonstrating the presence or absence of peritoneal violation and type of intraperitoneal organ injury, if any, in hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating torso trauma but without definite peritoneal signs or radiographic evidence of free intraperitoneal air.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 29-month period, helical CT with oral, rectal, and intravenous contrast material (triple-contrast) was performed in 200 hemodynamically stable patients, including 169 men (age range, 15–85 years; mean age, 31 years) and 31 women (age range, 17–45 years; mean age, 28 years) with penetrating torso trauma. The study group included 86 patients with gunshot wounds, 111 with stab wounds, and three impaled by sharp objects. CT scans were evaluated prospectively by three trauma radiologists for evidence of peritoneal violation to determine injury to intra- or retroperitoneal solid organs, bowel, mesentery, vascular structures, diaphragm, and urinary tract. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT in the diagnosis of peritoneal violation were determined.
RESULTS: CT findings aided diagnosis of peritoneal violation in 34% of patients (68 of 200) and were negative for peritoneal violation in 66% of patients (132 of 200). Two patients with negative CT findings failed to improve with observation and underwent therapeutic laparotomy. CT had 97% sensitivity (66 of 68 findings), 98% specificity (130 of 132 findings), and 98% accuracy (196 of 200 findings) for peritoneal violation. CT aided diagnosis of 28 hepatic, 34 bowel or mesenteric, seven splenic, and six renal injuries. Laparotomy based on CT findings in 38 patients was considered therapeutic in 87% (33 of 38) and nontherapeutic in 8% (three of 38) and had negative results in 5% (two of 38).
CONCLUSION: Triple-contrast helical CT accurately demonstrates peritoneal violation and visceral injury in patients with penetrating torso wounds.
© RSNA, 2004
Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), helical, 78.12115 • Computed tomography (CT), multi–detector row, 78.12112 • Emergency radiology • Trauma
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. L. Dunfee, B. C. Lucey, and J. A. Soto Development of Renal Scars on CT After Abdominal Trauma: Does Grade of Injury Matter? Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1174 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J Ahmad, G C Beattie, R Kennedy, J A Kennedy, and W D B Clements Penetrating trauma to the junctional zone needs aggressive management BMJ, February 3, 2007; 334(7587): 257 - 258. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Whitfield and J.P. Garner The early management of gunshot wounds Part II: the abdomen, extremities and special situations Trauma, January 1, 2007; 9(1): 47 - 71. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Salim, B. Sangthong, M. Martin, C. Brown, D. Plurad, K. Inaba, P. Rhee, and D. Demetriades Use of Computed Tomography in Anterior Abdominal Stab Wounds: Results of a Prospective Study Arch Surg, August 1, 2006; 141(8): 745 - 752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |
