Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published online before print April 22, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2313030785
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2313030785v1
231/3/858    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaffler, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Aigner, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaffler, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Aigner, R. M.
(Radiology 2004;231:858-865.)
© RSNA, 2004

Nuclear Medicine

Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Evaluation of Pleural Abnormalities on CT Scans with 18F FDG PET1

Gottfried J. Schaffler, MD, Gerald Wolf, MD, Helmut Schoellnast, MD, Reinhard Groell, MD, Alfred Maier, MD, Freya M. Smolle-Jüttner, MD, Michael Woltsche, MD, Gerlinde Fasching, MD, Rudolf Nicoletti, PhD and Reingard M. Aigner, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (G.J.S., G.W., H.S., R.G., R.N., R.M.A.), Surgery (A.M., F.M.S.J.), and Pulmonology (G.F.), University Hospital Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9, A-8036 Graz, Austria; and Department of Pulmonology, County Hospital Hörgas-Enzenbach, Gratwein, Austria (M.W.). Received May 25, 2003; revision requested July 17; final revision received October 29; accepted November 6. Address correspondence to G.J.S. (e-mail: gottfried.schaffler@kfunigraz.ac.at).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in differentiation of pleural malignancy and cancer-unrelated pleural disease in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and pleural abnormalities at computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 92 patients, pleural abnormalities were detected at contrast material–enhanced thoracic CT, which was performed for newly diagnosed NSCLC (n = 41) or restaging (n = 51). CT findings were negative for pleural malignancy when pleural effusion with attenuation of 10 HU or less and/or rib fractures with no evidence of pathologic fracture were present; findings were indeterminate when pleural effusion with attenuation greater than 10 HU and/or solid pleural abnormalities without osseous destruction of the chest wall were present; and findings were positive if any osseous destruction of the chest wall adjacent to a pleural mass was present. All patients underwent FDG PET. Findings were negative for pleural malignancy if pleural activity was absent, equal to, or less than mediastinal background activity; findings were positive if pleural activity was higher than mediastinal background activity. Reading of CT and FDG PET scans was first performed separately and then was combined. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPP), and accuracy were calculated for CT and FDG PET separately and for CT and FDG PET combined, with cytologic and/or histologic analysis as standard of reference.

RESULTS: In detection of pleural malignancies, CT findings were indeterminate in 65 (71%) patients and true-negative in 27 (29%). Respective sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of FDG PET in detection of pleural malignancies were 100%, 71%, 63%, 100%, and 80%; and those of CT and FDG PET combined, 100%, 76%, 67%, 100%, and 84%.

CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that a negative FDG PET scan for indeterminate pleural abnormalities at CT indicates a benign character, while positive findings on an FDG PET scan are sensitive for malignancy.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Lung neoplasms, 60.321, 60.33 • Lung neoplasms, CT, 60.12112, 60.12115 • Lung neoplasms, PET, 60.12163 • Pleura, CT, 66.12112 • Pleura, neoplasms, 66.317, 66.33 • Pleura, PET, 66.12163




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
J. E. Heffner and J. S. Klein
Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Malignant Pleural Effusions
Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2008; 83(2): 235 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JNMHome page
T. Bunyaviroch and R. E. Coleman
PET Evaluation of Lung Cancer
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 451 - 469.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
R. F. Munden, S. S. Swisher, C. W. Stevens, and D. J. Stewart
Imaging of the Patient with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 803 - 818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]