Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 29, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2313021689
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2313021689v1
231/3/887    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osada, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sekiya, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Osada, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sekiya, S.
(Radiology 2004;231:887-892.)
© RSNA, 2004


Obstetric Imaging

Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluations of Fetal Lung with MR Imaging1

Hisao Osada, MD, Kenshi Kaku, MD, Kentaro Masuda, MD, Yoshinori Iitsuka, MD, Katsuyoshi Seki, MD and Souei Sekiya, MD

1 From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba University School of Medicine (H.O., K.K., K.M., Y.I.) and Department of Reproductive Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University (K.S., S.S.), 1–8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 260-8677 Japan. Received December 19, 2002; revision requested February 7, 2003; final revision received September 10; accepted October 21. Address correspondence to H.O. (e-mail: hosada@mue.biglobe.ne.jp).

PURPOSE: To measure both volume and signal intensity of the fetal lung at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to evaluate the clinical use of this method to predict fetal pulmonary hypoplasia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 87 fetuses evaluated with MR imaging at 24–39 weeks of gestation were classified into a control group with good respiratory outcome (group A, n = 58) or a poor outcome group with severe respiratory disturbance after birth (group B, n = 29). Planimetric measurement of total lung volume and calculation of the ratio of lung signal intensity to spinal fluid signal intensity (L/SF) were performed on MR images by using region-of-interest analysis. Regression analysis, analysis of covariance, analysis of variance, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed.

RESULTS: The best fit for group A lung volume was represented by the regression line V = (2.41 x G) – 37.6 (r = 0.537, P < .001), in which V is lung volume and G is gestational weeks; that for group B, by V = (0.97 x G) – 14.0 (r = 0.378, P < .05). Results of analysis of covariance with gestational weeks used as a covariate showed a significant difference in lung volume between the two groups (P < .001). Mean ± SEM for L/SF ratio was 0.817 ± 0.013 and 0.598 ± 0.019 in groups A and B, respectively (P < .001). For prediction of postnatal respiratory outcome, the area under the ROC curve for lung volume and L/SF ratio combined was 0.990, significantly higher than that for lung volume alone (P < .05).

CONCLUSION: Simultaneous measurement of fetal lung volume and signal intensity on MR images is a promising method for predicting fetal pulmonary hypoplasia.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Fetus, respiratory system, 80.8755 • Lung, abnormalities, 80.8755 • Lung, MR, 60.121412, 60.121419, 60.12146




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
C. F. A. Peralta, J. F. Kazan-Tannus, V. Bunduki, E. M. Santos, C. C. de Castro, G. G. Cerri, and M. Zugaib
Evaluation of the Agreement Between 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Fetal Lung Volume Measurement
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2006; 25(4): 461 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
L. F. Goncalves, W. Lee, J. Espinoza, and R. Romero
Three- and 4-Dimensional Ultrasound in Obstetric Practice: Does It Help?
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2005; 24(12): 1599 - 1624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. A. Obuchowski
ROC Analysis
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 364 - 372.
[Full Text] [PDF]