Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print April 22, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2313030874

(Radiology 2004;231:813.)

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2313030874v1
231/3/813    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foster, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Paramagul, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foster, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Paramagul, C.
© RSNA, 2004

Breast Imaging

Lobular Carcinoma in Situ or Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia at Core-Needle Biopsy: Is Excisional Biopsy Necessary?1

Michelle C. Foster, MD, Mark A. Helvie, MD, Nancy E. Gregory, MD, Murray Rebner, MD, Alexis V. Nees, MD and Chintana Paramagul, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, TC 2910N, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0326 (M.C.F., M.A.H., A.V.N., C.P.); and Department of Radiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Mich (N.E.G., M.R.). Received May 28, 2003; revision requested August 12; revision received October 3; accepted November 6. Address correspondence to M.A.H.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine frequency of invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at excisional biopsy in women with atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) at percutaneous core-needle biopsy (CNB).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of results in 6,081 consecutive patients who underwent CNB at two institutions revealed that in 35 (0.58%), LCIS (n = 15) or ALH (n = 20) was the pathologic finding with highest risk. Patient age range was 41–84 years (mean, 59 years). Of 35 patients, 26 (74%) underwent excisional biopsy and nine (26%) underwent mammographic follow-up for longer than 2 years. Lesions with a pathologic upgrade were noted when invasive cancer or DCIS occurred at the CNB site. CNB results in patients with a diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) (75 of 6,081 [1.2%]) were reviewed; these patients underwent subsequent excisional biopsy. Statistical comparison of frequency of upgrading of lesions in patients with a diagnosis of LCIS or ALH at CNB and in those with a diagnosis of ADH at CNB was performed (Pearson {chi}2 test).

RESULTS: In six (17%) of 35 (95% CI: 4.7%, 29.6%) patients, lesions were upgraded to DCIS (n = 4) or invasive cancer (n = 2). In 15 patients with LCIS diagnosed at CNB, lesions in four (27%) were upgraded to either DCIS or invasive cancer. In 20 patients with ALH diagnosed at CNB, lesions were upgraded to DCIS in two (10%). Lesions in nine patients who underwent mammographic follow-up were stable. No mammographic or technical findings distinguished patients with upgraded lesions from those whose lesions were not upgraded. In 12 (16%) of 75 (95% CI: 7.7%, 24.3%) patients with ADH, lesions were upgraded. Difference between the upgrade rate in patients with LCIS or ALH and that in those with ADH was not significant (P = .88).

CONCLUSION: Lesions in 17% of patients with LCIS or ALH at CNB were upgraded to invasive cancer or DCIS; this rate was similar to the upgrade rate in patients with ADH. Excisional biopsy is supported when LCIS, ALH, or ADH is diagnosed at CNB.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Breast, biopsy, 00.1261 • Breast neoplasms, diagnosis, 00.31, 00.32




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. F. Brem, M. C. Lechner, R. J. Jackman, J. A. Rapelyea, W. P. Evans, L. E. Philpotts, J. Hargreaves, and S. Wasden
Lobular Neoplasia at Percutaneous Breast Biopsy: Variables Associated with Carcinoma at Surgical Excision
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 637 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Sklair-Levy, T. Sella, T. Alweiss, I. Craciun, E. Libson, and B. Mally
Incidence and Management of Complex Fibroadenomas
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 214 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. Pandey, M. J. Kornstein, W. Shank, and E. S. de Paredes
Columnar Cell Lesions of the Breast: Mammographic Findings with Histopathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2007; 27(suppl_1): S79 - S89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. F. Dillon, E. W. McDermott, A. D. Hill, A. O'Doherty, N. O'Higgins, and C. M. Quinn
Predictive Value of Breast Lesions of "Uncertain Malignant Potential" and "Suspicious for Malignancy" Determined by Needle Core Biopsy
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 704 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. C. Mahoney, T. M. Robinson-Smith, and E. A. Shaughnessy
Lobular Neoplasia at 11-Gauge Vacuum-Assisted Stereotactic Biopsy: Correlation with Surgical Excisional Biopsy and Mammographic Follow-Up
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 949 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. A. Cohen
Cancer Upgrades at Excisional Biopsy after Diagnosis of Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia or Lobular Carcinoma in Situ at Core-Needle Biopsy: Some Reasons Why
Radiology, June 1, 2004; 231(3): 617 - 621.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.