| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Genitourinary Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Urology (M.M., M.W.K., P.T.S.) and Radiology (H.H., L.W., H.N.C.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021. Received August 6, 2003; revision requested September 18; revision received December 19; accepted January 13, 2004. Supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01 CA76423. Address correspondence to H.H. (e-mail: muellnea@mskcc.org).
PURPOSE: To determine whether predictive value of endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings in detection of prostate cancer extracapsular extension (ECE) is significantly affected by the reader’s subspecialty experience.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cohort study, 344 consecutive patients with biopsy-proved prostate cancer underwent endorectal MR imaging followed by surgery. Likelihood of ECE described in MR imaging reports was compared with clinical predictor variables. ECE was determined from the final pathologic report on specimens resected at surgery. Readers of MR images were classified into genitourinary MR imaging radiologists (n = 4) and general body MR imaging radiologists (n = 6). For data analysis, Wilcoxon rank sum and 
2 tests, as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, were used. A difference with P < .05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Univariate analysis results demonstrated that all predictors except clinical stage were significantly associated with detection of ECE in both groups of readers (P < .05). In the genitourinary MR imaging radiologist group of patients, area under the ROC curve for endorectal MR imaging findings (0.833) was larger than areas under the curves for all other predictors (0.566–0.701). In the general body MR imaging radiologist group of patients, area under the ROC curve for endorectal MR imaging findings (0.646) was not larger than areas under the curves for all other predictors (0.582–0.793). Results of multivariate analysis of two models, one with all predictors and another with all predictors except endorectal MR imaging findings, demonstrated a significant increase in area under the ROC curve with endorectal MR images interpreted by genitourinary MR imaging radiologists (P = .019 and .31, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Endorectal MR imaging findings are significant predictors for detection of ECE when MR images are interpreted by genitourinary radiologists experienced with MR imaging of the prostate.
© RSNA, 2004
Index terms: Diagnostic radiology, observer performance • Magnetic resonance (MR), coils, 844.121411, 844.121419 • Magnetic resonance (MR), spectroscopy, 844.12145 • Prostate, biopsy, 844.1261 • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. N. Bloch, E. Furman-Haran, T. H. Helbich, R. E. Lenkinski, H. Degani, C. Kratzik, M. Susani, A. Haitel, S. Jaromi, L. Ngo, et al. Prostate Cancer: Accurate Determination of Extracapsular Extension with High-Spatial-Resolution Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR Imaging Initial Results Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 176 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Kawakami, I. Fukui, J. Yonese, Y. Okubo, S. Yamamoto, T. Tsukamoto, and Y. Ishikawa Antegrade Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy with Preliminary Ligation of Vascular Pedicles in 614 Consecutive Patients Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2007; 37(7): 528 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. W. T. P. J. Heijmink, J. J. Futterer, T. Hambrock, S. Takahashi, T. W. J. Scheenen, H. J. Huisman, C. A. Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, B. C. Knipscheer, L. A. L. M. Kiemeney, J. A. Witjes, et al. Prostate Cancer: Body-Array versus Endorectal Coil MR Imaging at 3 T--Comparison of Image Quality, Localization, and Staging Performance Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 184 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Hricak, P. L. Choyke, S. C. Eberhardt, S. A. Leibel, and P. T. Scardino Imaging Prostate Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Perspective Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 28 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Graser, A. Heuck, B. Sommer, J. Massmann, J. Scheidler, M. Reiser, and U. Mueller-Lisse Per-Sextant Localization and Staging of Prostate Cancer: Correlation of Imaging Findings with Whole-Mount Step Section Histopathology Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 84 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Reinsberg, G. S. Payne, S. F. Riches, S. Ashley, J. M. Brewster, V. A. Morgan, and N. M. deSouza Combined Use of Diffusion-Weighted MRI and 1H MR Spectroscopy to Increase Accuracy in Prostate Cancer Detection Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 91 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Wang, J. Zhang, L. H. Schwartz, H. Eisenberg, N. M. Ishill, C. S. Moskowitz, P. Scardino, and H. Hricak Incremental Value of Multiplanar Cross-Referencing for Prostate Cancer Staging with Endorectal MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 99 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Wang, H. Hricak, M. W. Kattan, H. N. Chen, K. Kuroiwa, H. F. Eisenberg, and P. T. Scardino Prediction of Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value of Adding Endorectal MR Imaging to the Kattan Nomogram Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 182 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Wang, H. Hricak, M. W. Kattan, L. H. Schwartz, S. C. Eberhardt, H.-N. Chen, and P. T. Scardino Combined endorectal and phased-array MRI in the prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 743 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Sala, S. C. Eberhardt, O. Akin, C. S. Moskowitz, C. N. Onyebuchi, K. Kuroiwa, N. Ishill, M. J. Zelefsky, J. A. Eastham, and H. Hricak Endorectal MR Imaging before Salvage Prostatectomy: Tumor Localization and Staging Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 176 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Wang, H. Hricak, M. W. Kattan, H.-N. Chen, P. T. Scardino, and K. Kuroiwa Prediction of Organ-confined Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value of MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopic Imaging to Staging Nomograms Radiology, December 12, 2005; (2005) 2382041905. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Futterer, S. W. T. P. J. Heijmink, T. W. J. Scheenen, G. J. Jager, C. A. Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, J. A. Witjes, and J. O. Barentsz Prostate Cancer: Local Staging at 3-T Endorectal MR Imaging--Early Experience Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 184 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J. Futterer, M. R. Engelbrecht, H. J. Huisman, G. J. Jager, C. A. Hulsbergen-van De Kaa, J. A. Witjes, and J. O. Barentsz Staging Prostate Cancer with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Endorectal MR Imaging prior to Radical Prostatectomy: Experienced versus Less Experienced Readers Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 541 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Beyersdorff, K. Taymoorian, T. Knosel, D. Schnorr, R. Felix, B. Hamm, and H. Bruhn MRI of Prostate Cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Comparison of Image Quality in Tumor Detection and Staging Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1214 - 1220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H Hricak MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging in the pre-treatment evaluation of prostate cancer Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(Special_Issue_2): S103 - S111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Schoder, H. W.D. Yeung, and S. M. Larson CT in PET/CT: Essential Features of Interpretation J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 1249 - 1251. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Wang, M. Mullerad, H.-N. Chen, S. C. Eberhardt, M. W. Kattan, P. T. Scardino, and H. Hricak Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value of Endorectal MR Imaging Findings for Prediction of Extracapsular Extension Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 133 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |
