|
|
||||||||
Cardiac Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Cardiology (G.K.L., J.H.G., T.M.), Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (A.S., M.P.B., J.H.G., G.A.), and Nuclear Medicine (V.M., J.M.), University Hospital Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany; and Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco (M.S., C.B.H.). From the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received July 18, 2003; revision requested October 2; revision received October 29; accepted January 5, 2004. Supported in part by Schering, Berlin, Germany, and by the Pinguin Stiftung Düsseldorf, Germany. Address correspondence to G.K.L. (e-mail: glund@uke.uni-hamburg.de).
PURPOSE: To evaluate acute myocardial infarction by using first-pass enhancement (FPE) and delayed enhancement (DE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging compared with thallium 201 (201Tl) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast materialenhanced FPE MR, inversion-recovery DE MR, and rest-redistribution 201Tl SPECT images were obtained in 60 consecutive patients (53 men, seven women; mean age [± SD], 56 years ± 13; range, 3078 years) at 6 days ± 3 after reperfused first myocardial infarction. Presence of microvascular obstruction was determined on FPE MR images. Infarct size was defined on DE MR images as percentage of left ventricular (LV) area and compared with uptake defect on redistribution 201Tl SPECT images. Differences in continuous data were analyzed with Student t test. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis were used to compare measurements of infarct size.
RESULTS: Mean infarct size was not significantly different between DE MR imaging (20.7% ± 11.5% of LV area) and 201Tl SPECT (19.4% ± 14.3% of LV area; P = .26); good correlation (r = 0.73; P < .001) and agreement were found, with a mean difference of +1.3% ± 9.8% of LV area. 201Tl SPECT failed to depict infarct in six (20%) of 30 patients with inferior myocardial infarction (mean size, 6.4% ± 5.7% of LV area on DE MR images), whereas DE MR images showed the infarct in all patients (P < .01). FPE MR images depicted microvascular obstruction in 23 (38%) of 60 patients; these patients had larger infarctions at DE MR imaging than did patients without microvascular obstruction (30.4% ± 9.0% vs 15.1% ± 8.4% of LV area, P < .001). 201Tl SPECT showed larger infarcts in patients with microvascular obstruction (26.7% ± 16.2% vs 15.0% ± 11.2% of LV area, P < .01).
CONCLUSION: Good correlation and agreement with 201Tl SPECT indicate DE MR imaging may be used to estimate infarct size 6 days after reperfused acute myocardial infarction. DE MR imaging is more sensitive for detection of inferior infarction than is 201Tl SPECT. Patients with microvascular obstruction on FPE MR images have larger infarcts.
© RSNA, 2004
Index terms: Coronary vessels, stenosis or obstruction, 54.771 Myocardium, infarction, 511.771 Myocardium, MR, 511.121413, 511.12143 Myocardium, SPECT, 511.12162 Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), comparative studies, 511.121413, 511.12162
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. P. O'Regan, R. Ahmed, C. Neuwirth, Y. Tan, G. Durighel, J. V. Hajnal, I. Nadra, S. J. Corbett, and S. A. Cook Cardiac MRI of myocardial salvage at the peri-infarct border zones after primary coronary intervention Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2009; 297(1): H340 - H346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Carlsson, M. Wilson, A. J. Martin, and M. Saeed Myocardial Microinfarction after Coronary Microembolization in Swine: MR Imaging Characterization Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 703 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. O'Regan, R. Ahmed, N. Karunanithy, C. Neuwirth, Y. Tan, G. Durighel, J. V. Hajnal, I. Nadra, S. J. Corbett, and S. A. Cook Reperfusion Hemorrhage Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: Assessment with T2* Mapping and Effect on Measuring the Area at Risk Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 916 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nijveldt, M. B. M. Hofman, A. Hirsch, A. M. Beek, V. A. W. M. Umans, P. R. Algra, J. J. Piek, and A. C. van Rossum Assessment of Microvascular Obstruction and Prediction of Short-term Remodeling after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Cardiac MR Imaging Study Radiology, February 1, 2009; 250(2): 363 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W P Bandettini and A E Arai Advances in clinical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging Heart, November 1, 2008; 94(11): 1485 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nijveldt, A. M. Beek, A. Hirsch, M. G. Stoel, M. B.M. Hofman, V. A.W.M. Umans, P. R. Algra, J. W.R. Twisk, and A. C. van Rossum Functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction comparison between angiography, electrocardiography, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of microvascular injury. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 15, 2008; 52(3): 181 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Pineda, X. Merino, S. Gispert, P. Mahia, B. Garcia, and R. Dominguez-Oronoz No-Reflow Phenomenon in Cardiac MRI: Diagnosis and Clinical Implications Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 73 - 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Rochitte Microvascular obstruction the final frontier for a complete myocardial reperfusion. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 10, 2008; 51(23): 2239 - 2240. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. K. Lund, A. Stork, K. Muellerleile, A. A. Barmeyer, M. P. Bansmann, M. Knefel, U. Schlichting, M. Muller, P. E. Verde, G. Adam, et al. Prediction of Left Ventricular Remodeling and Analysis of Infarct Resorption in Patients with Reperfused Myocardial Infarcts by Using Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 95 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Saeed, D. Saloner, A. Martin, L. Do, O. Weber, P. C. Ursell, A. Jacquier, R. Lee, and C. B. Higgins Adeno-associated Viral Vector-Encoding Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene: Effect on Cardiovascular MR Perfusion and Infarct Resorption Measurements in Swine Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 451 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ibrahim, H. P. Bulow, T. Hackl, M. Hornke, S. G. Nekolla, M. Breuer, A. Schomig, and M. Schwaiger Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography for Detection of Myocardial Necrosis Early After Acute Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2007; 49(2): 208 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Saeed, O. Weber, R. Lee, L. Do, A. Martin, D. Saloner, P. Ursell, P. Robert, C. Corot, and C. B. Higgins Discrimination of Myocardial Acute and Chronic (Scar) Infarctions on Delayed Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Intravascular Magnetic Resonance Contrast Media J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 1961 - 1968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Finn, R. Saleh, S. Thesen, S. G. Ruehm, M. H. Lee, J. Grinstead, J. S. Child, and G. Laub MR Imaging with Remote Control: Feasibility Study in Cardiovascular Disease Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 528 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Yan, A. J. Shayne, K. A. Brown, S. N. Gupta, C. W. Chan, T. M. Luu, M. F. Di Carli, H. G. Reynolds, W. G. Stevenson, and R. Y. Kwong Characterization of the Peri-Infarct Zone by Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is a Powerful Predictor of Post-Myocardial Infarction Mortality Circulation, July 4, 2006; 114(1): 32 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. van den Bos, T. Baks, A. D. Moelker, W. Kerver, R.-J. van Geuns, W. J. van der Giessen, D. J. Duncker, and P. A. Wielopolski Magnetic resonance imaging of haemorrhage within reperfused myocardial infarcts: possible interference with iron oxide-labelled cell tracking? Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2006; 27(13): 1620 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. Meyer, K. C. Wollert, J. Lotz, J. Steffens, P. Lippolt, S. Fichtner, H. Hecker, A. Schaefer, L. Arseniev, B. Hertenstein, et al. Intracoronary Bone Marrow Cell Transfer After Myocardial Infarction: Eighteen Months' Follow-Up Data From the Randomized, Controlled BOOST (BOne marrOw transfer to enhance ST-elevation infarct regeneration) Trial Circulation, March 14, 2006; 113(10): 1287 - 1294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tarantini, L. Cacciavillani, F. Corbetti, A. Ramondo, M. P. Marra, E. Bacchiega, M. Napodano, C. Bilato, R. Razzolini, and S. Iliceto Duration of Ischemia Is a Major Determinant of Transmurality and Severe Microvascular Obstruction After Primary Angioplasty: A Study Performed With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 4, 2005; 46(7): 1229 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Gibbons and P. A. Araoz The Year in Cardiac Imaging J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 2, 2005; 46(3): 542 - 551. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Slomka, D. Fieno, L. Thomson, J. D. Friedman, S. W. Hayes, G. Germano, and D. S. Berman Automatic Detection and Size Quantification of Infarcts by Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: Clinical Validation by Delayed-Enhancement MRI J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2005; 46(5): 728 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Hombach, O. Grebe, N. Merkle, S. Waldenmaier, M. Hoher, M. Kochs, J. Wohrle, and H. A. Kestler Sequelae of acute myocardial infarction regarding cardiac structure and function and their prognostic significance as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging Eur. Heart J., March 2, 2005; 26(6): 549 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||