Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print May 27, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2321030663
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2321030663v1
232/1/75    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Overhagen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Overhagen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, B. E.
(Radiology 2004;232:75-80.)
© RSNA, 2004


Thoracic Imaging

Metastases in Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes in Lung Cancer: Assessment with Palpation, US, and CT1

Hans van Overhagen, MD, PhD, Koen Brakel, MD, PhD, Mark W. Heijenbrok, MD, Jan H. L. M. van Kasteren, MD, Cees N. F. van de Moosdijk, MD, Albert C. Roldaan, MD, PhD, Ad P. van Gils, MD, PhD and Bettina E. Hansen, MSc

1 From the Departments of Radiology (H.v.O., M.W.H., A.P.v.G.) and Pulmonology (A.C.R.), Leyenburg Hospital, Leyweg 245, 2545 CH, The Hague, the Netherlands; Departments of Radiology (K.B.) and Pulmonology (J.H.L.M.v.K., C.N.F.v.d.M.), St Anna Hospital, Geldrop, the Netherlands; and Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (B.E.H.), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. From the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received April 26, 2003; revision requested July 8; final revision received October 21; accepted November 20. Address correspondence to H.v.O. (e-mail: h.voverhagen@leyenburg-ziekenhuis.nl).

PURPOSE: To compare ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and palpation for diagnosing supraclavicular lung cancer metastases and to assess the effect of proved metastases on TNM stage and diagnostic work-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventeen consecutive patients (91 men and 26 women; mean age, 64.0 years) underwent palpation, US, and CT of supraclavicular regions and chest and upper abdominal CT. Fine-needle aspiration cytologic (FNAC) analysis was performed in patients with nodes with a short-axis diameter of 5 mm or greater; cytologic diagnosis was used as the standard of reference. Sensitivities of palpation, US, and CT were compared with McNemar testing. Relationship between size and palpability of nodes with metastasis was evaluated with logistic regression.

RESULTS: Supraclavicular metastases were diagnosed cytologically in 30 (26%) of 117 patients: eight (31%) of 26 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 22 (24%) of 91 patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sensitivities of US (1.00; 30 of 30 patients) and CT (0.83; 25 of 30 patients) for detection of metastases were significantly higher (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively) than that of palpation (0.33; 10 of 30 patients). Palpable nodes with metastasis (mean diameter, 25.2 mm) were significantly larger than nonpalpable nodes with metastasis (mean diameter, 13.7 mm) (P = .002). To have a 50% chance of being palpable, nodes with metastasis had to have a diameter of at least 22.3 mm. TNM stage was changed in three of 91 patients with NSCLC, and further invasive diagnostic procedures were prevented in 11 of such patients because it was proved that nonpalpable nodes had metastases.

CONCLUSION: Supraclavicular lung cancer metastases were cytologically proved in 26% of patients. Nodes with metastasis were only palpable when markedly enlarged. US tripled the sensitivity of palpation for detection of metastases. Results of US and US-guided FNAC analysis can change the work-up in patients with lung cancer.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Lung neoplasms, metastases, 60.3213, 60.3214 • Lung neoplasms, staging, 60.3213, 60.3214 • Lymphatic system, biopsy, 997.12985 • Lymphatic system, CT, 997.12912, 997.12915 • Lymphatic system, US, 997.12981




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. Soudack, R. B. Shalom, O. Israel, Y. Ben-Arie, Z. Levy, and D. Gaitini
Utility of Sonographically Guided Biopsy in Metabolically Suspected Recurrent Lymphoma
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2008; 27(2): 225 - 231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. M. Sung, K. S. Lee, B.-T. Kim, S. Kim, O J. Kwon, J. Y. Choi, and S.-O. Yang
Nonpalpable Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes in Lung Cancer Patients: Preoperative Characterization with 18F-FDG PET/CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 246 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
R. H. Choplin, D. J. Conces Jr, and S. D. Teague
Invited Commentary
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2005; 25(3): 786 - 788.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
M Kumaran, R E Benamore, R Vaidhyanath, S Muller, C J Richards, M D Peake, and J J Entwisle
Ultrasound guided cytological aspiration of supraclavicular lymph nodes in patients with suspected lung cancer
Thorax, March 1, 2005; 60(3): 229 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.