| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Review |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (R.G.H.B.T.) and Surgery (G.L.B.), University Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands. Received October 25, 2002; revision requested December 27; final revision received April 24, 2003; accepted May 20; updated November 26. Address correspondence to R.G.H.B.T. (e-mail: rbe@rdia.azm.nl).
One concern after rectal cancer surgery is the high local recurrence rate. Randomized trials have shown that the best local control rate for rectal cancer patients as a group is achieved after a short course of radiation therapy followed by optimal surgery. It is debatable, however, whether all patients with rectal cancer should undergo preoperative radiation therapy. Preoperative identification of those most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant therapy is important. Therefore, the challenge for preoperative imaging in rectal cancer is to determine subgroups of patients with different risks for recurrence: those with superficial tumors, who can be treated with surgery alone; those with operable tumors and a wide circumferential resection margin, who can be treated with a short course of radiation therapy followed by total mesorectal excision; and those with advanced cancer and a close or involved resection margin, who require a long course of radiation therapy, with or without chemotherapy, and extensive surgery. So far, there is no consensus on the role of diagnostic imaging (endorectal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance [MR] imaging) in the care of patients with primary rectal cancer. Preoperative staging has long relied on digital examination alone, which indicates that it has been difficult to achieve accuracy levels high enough for clinical decision making with preoperative imaging. In this review, the relevance of preoperative imaging in staging the local extent of primary rectal cancer will be discussed. Research on various imaging modalities, with an emphasis on MR, will be discussed under four main headings that address the most relevant aspects of local spread of rectal tumors: T stage, circumferential resection margin, locally advanced rectal cancer, and N stage.
© RSNA, 2004
Index terms: Rectum, CT, 757.12111, 757.12112 • Rectum, MR, 757.121411, 757.12143 • Rectum, neoplasms, 757.321 • Review
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  X. M. Zhang, H. L. Zhang, D. Yu, Y. Dai, D. Bi, M. R. Prince, and C. Li 3-T MRI of Rectal Carcinoma: Preoperative Diagnosis, Staging, and Planning of Sphincter-Sparing Surgery Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1271 - 1278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Borschitz, D. Wachtlin, M. Mohler, H. Schmidberger, and T. Junginger Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Local Excision for T2-3 Rectal Cancer Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 15(3): 712 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Yamada, S. Okabe, M. Enomoto, K. Sugihara, N. Yoshino, A. Tetsumura, J. Kumagai, and H. Shibuya Colorectal Carcinoma: In Vitro Evaluation with High-Spatial-Resolution 3D Constructive Interference in Steady-State MR Imaging Radiology, December 19, 2007; (2007) 2462070128. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. R. Muthusamy and K. J. Chang Optimal Methods for Staging Rectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6877s - 6884s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. A. Wieder, R. Rosenberg, F. Lordick, H. Geinitz, A. Beer, K. Becker, K. Woertler, M. Dobritz, J. R. Siewert, E. J. Rummeny, et al. Rectal Cancer: MR Imaging before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Prediction of Tumor-Free Circumferential Resection Margins and Long-term Survival Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 744 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S D Allen, V Gada, and D M Blunt Variation of mesorectal volume with abdominal fat volume in patients with rectal carcinoma: assessment with MRI Br. J. Radiol., April 1, 2007; 80(952): 242 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. D. Allen, A. R. Padhani, A. S. Dzik-Jurasz, and R. Glynne-Jones Rectal Carcinoma: MRI with Histologic Correlation Before and After Chemoradiation Therapy Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 442 - 451. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.-K. Chun, D. Choi, M. J. Kim, J. Lee, S. H. Yun, S. H. Kim, S. J. Lee, and C. K. Kim Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography. Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1557 - 1562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. C. de Bruin, C. J.H. van de Velde, S. van de Pas, I. D. Nagtegaal, J. H. J.M. van Krieken, M. J.E.M. Gosens, L. T.C. Peltenburg, J. P. Medema, and C. A.M. Marijnen Prognostic value of apoptosis in rectal cancer patients of the dutch total mesorectal excision trial: radiotherapy is redundant in intrinsically high-apoptotic tumors. Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 12(21): 6432 - 6436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Stollfuss, K. Becker, A. Sendler, S. Seidl, M. Settles, F. Auer, A. Beer, E. J. Rummeny, and K. Woertler Rectal Carcinoma: High-Spatial-Resolution MR Imaging and T2 Quantification in Rectal Cancer Specimens Radiology, October 1, 2006; 241(1): 132 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Iafrate, A. Laghi, P. Paolantonio, M. Rengo, P. Mercantini, M. Ferri, V. Ziparo, and R. Passariello Preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MR Imaging: correlation with surgical and histopathologic findings. RadioGraphics, May 1, 2006; 26(3): 701 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |
