|
|
||||||||
Neuroradiology |
1 From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710 (J.M.P., P. McGraw, A.C.G., D.D.); and Department of Radiology, Drexel University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (P. Mhatre). Received June 18, 2003; revision requested August 27; final revision received January 12, 2004; accepted February 24. Address correspondence to J.M.P.
PURPOSE: To retrospectively measure the diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging characteristics of peritumoral hyperintense white matter (WM) and peritumoral normal-appearing WM, as seen on T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images of infiltrative high-grade gliomas and meningiomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients with biopsy-proved glioma and nine patients with imaging findings consistent with meningioma and an adjacent hyperintense region on T2-weighted MR images were examined with DW and diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were measured on maps generated from isotropic DW images of enhancing tumor, hyperintense regions adjacent to enhancing tumor, normal-appearing WM adjacent to hyperintense regions, and analogous locations in the contralateral WM corresponding to these areas. Fractional anisotropy (FA) was measured in similar locations on maps generated from diffusion-tensor imaging data. Changes in ADC and FA in each type of tissue were compared across tumor types by using a two-sample t test. P < .05 indicated statistical significance.
RESULTS: Mean ADCs in peritumoral hyperintense regions were 1.309 x 103 mm2/sec (mean percentage of 181% of normal WM) for gliomas and 1.427 x 103 mm2/sec (192% of normal value) for meningiomas (no significant difference). Mean ADCs in peritumoral normal-appearing WM were 0.723 x 103 mm2/sec (106% of normal value) for gliomas and 0.743 x 103 mm2/sec (102% of normal value) for meningiomas (no significant difference). Mean FA values in peritumoral hyperintense regions were 0.178 (43% of normal WM value) for gliomas and 0.224 (65% of normal value) for meningiomas (P = .05). Mean FA values for peritumoral normal-appearing WM were 0.375 (83% of normal value) for gliomas and 0.404 (100% of normal value) for meningiomas (P = .01).
CONCLUSION: The difference in FA decreases in peritumoral normal-appearing WM between gliomas and meningiomas was significant, and the difference in FA decreases in peritumoral hyperintense regions between these tumors approached but did not reach significance. These findings may indicate a role for diffusion MR imaging in the detection of tumoral infiltration that is not visible on conventional MR images.
© RSNA, 2004
Index terms: Brain, diffusion, 10.91 Brain neoplasms, diagnosis, 10.363, 10.366, 10.38 Brain neoplasms, MR, 10.121411, 10.121416, 10.12143, 10.12144 Magnetic resonance (MR), diffusion study, 10.12144
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Wang, C.E. Steward, and P.M. Desmond Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Glioblastoma Multiforme and Brain Metastases: The Role of p, q, L, and Fractional Anisotropy AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2009; 30(1): 203 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Toh, M. Castillo, A.M.-C. Wong, K.-C. Wei, H.-F. Wong, S.-H. Ng, and Y.-L. Wan Primary Cerebral Lymphoma and Glioblastoma Multiforme: Differences in Diffusion Characteristics Evaluated with Diffusion Tensor Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2008; 29(3): 471 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. P. Nucifora, R. Verma, S.-K. Lee, and E. R. Melhem Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging and Tractography: Exploring Brain Microstructure and Connectivity Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 367 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Kwee, J. P. Ko, C. S. Jiang, M. R. Watters, and M. N. Coel Solitary Brain Lesions Enhancing at MR Imaging: Evaluation with Fluorine 18 Fluorocholine PET Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 557 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Al-Okaili, J. Krejza, J. H. Woo, R. L. Wolf, D. M. O'Rourke, K. D. Judy, H. Poptani, and E. R. Melhem Intraaxial Brain Masses: MR Imaging-based Diagnostic Strategy--Initial Experience Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 539 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Stadlbauer, C. Nimsky, S. Gruber, E. Moser, T. Hammen, T. Engelhorn, M. Buchfelder, and O. Ganslandt Changes in Fiber Integrity, Diffusivity, and Metabolism of the Pyramidal Tract Adjacent to Gliomas: A Quantitative Diffusion Tensor Fiber Tracking and MR Spectroscopic Imaging Study AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 462 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.J. Price, R. Jena, N.G. Burnet, P.J. Hutchinson, A.F. Dean, A. Pena, J.D. Pickard, T.A. Carpenter, and J.H. Gillard Improved Delineation of Glioma Margins and Regions of Infiltration with the Use of Diffusion Tensor Imaging: An Image-Guided Biopsy Study. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2006; 27(9): 1969 - 1974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Stadlbauer, O. Ganslandt, R. Buslei, T. Hammen, S. Gruber, E. Moser, M. Buchfelder, E. Salomonowitz, and C. Nimsky Gliomas: Histopathologic Evaluation of Changes in Directionality and Magnitude of Water Diffusion at Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 803 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Provenzale, S. Mukundan, and D. P. Barboriak Diffusion-weighted and Perfusion MR Imaging for Brain Tumor Characterization and Assessment of Treatment Response. Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 632 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Hasan and J. Provenzale Diffusion Tensor Eigenvalues or Both Mean Diffusivity and Fractional Anisotropy Are Required in Quantitative Clinical Diffusion Tensor MR Reports: Fractional Anisotropy Alone Is Not Sufficient. Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 611 - 613. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Goebell, S. Paustenbach, O. Vaeterlein, X.-Q. Ding, O. Heese, J. Fiehler, T. Kucinski, C. Hagel, M. Westphal, and H. Zeumer Low-Grade and Anaplastic Gliomas: Differences in Architecture Evaluated with Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 217 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Field Diffusion Tensor Imaging at the Crossroads: Fiber Tracking Meets Tissue Characterization in Brain Tumors AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2005; 26(9): 2168 - 2169. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P.L. Roberts, F. Liu, A. Kassner, S. Mori, and A. Guha Fiber Density Index Correlates with Reduced Fractional Anisotropy in White Matter of Patients with Glioblastoma AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2005; 26(9): 2183 - 2186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Akabani, D. A. Reardon, R. E. Coleman, T. Z. Wong, S. D. Metzler, J. E. Bowsher, D. P. Barboriak, J. M. Provenzale, K. L. Greer, D. DeLong, et al. Dosimetry and Radiographic Analysis of 131I-Labeled Anti-Tenascin 81C6 Murine Monoclonal Antibody in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Malignant Gliomas: A Phase II Study J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 1042 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Pauleit, F. Floeth, K. Hamacher, M. J. Riemenschneider, G. Reifenberger, H.-W. Muller, K. Zilles, H. H. Coenen, and K.-J. Langen O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas Brain, March 1, 2005; 128(3): 678 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Yousem, S.-K. Lee, D. I. Kim, and J. Kim Invited Commentary * Authors' Response RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 66 - 68. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||