Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 23, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2322030959
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2322030959v1
232/2/451    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Provenzale, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Delong, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Provenzale, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Delong, D.
(Radiology 2004;232:451-460.)
© RSNA, 2004


Neuroradiology

Peritumoral Brain Regions in Gliomas and Meningiomas: Investigation with Isotropic Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging1

James M. Provenzale, MD, Peter McGraw, MD2, Pradnya Mhatre, MD, Alexander C. Guo, MD3 and David Delong, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710 (J.M.P., P. McGraw, A.C.G., D.D.); and Department of Radiology, Drexel University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (P. Mhatre). Received June 18, 2003; revision requested August 27; final revision received January 12, 2004; accepted February 24. Address correspondence to J.M.P.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively measure the diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging characteristics of peritumoral hyperintense white matter (WM) and peritumoral normal-appearing WM, as seen on T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images of infiltrative high-grade gliomas and meningiomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients with biopsy-proved glioma and nine patients with imaging findings consistent with meningioma and an adjacent hyperintense region on T2-weighted MR images were examined with DW and diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) were measured on maps generated from isotropic DW images of enhancing tumor, hyperintense regions adjacent to enhancing tumor, normal-appearing WM adjacent to hyperintense regions, and analogous locations in the contralateral WM corresponding to these areas. Fractional anisotropy (FA) was measured in similar locations on maps generated from diffusion-tensor imaging data. Changes in ADC and FA in each type of tissue were compared across tumor types by using a two-sample t test. P < .05 indicated statistical significance.

RESULTS: Mean ADCs in peritumoral hyperintense regions were 1.309 x 10–3 mm2/sec (mean percentage of 181% of normal WM) for gliomas and 1.427 x 10–3 mm2/sec (192% of normal value) for meningiomas (no significant difference). Mean ADCs in peritumoral normal-appearing WM were 0.723 x 10–3 mm2/sec (106% of normal value) for gliomas and 0.743 x 10–3 mm2/sec (102% of normal value) for meningiomas (no significant difference). Mean FA values in peritumoral hyperintense regions were 0.178 (43% of normal WM value) for gliomas and 0.224 (65% of normal value) for meningiomas (P = .05). Mean FA values for peritumoral normal-appearing WM were 0.375 (83% of normal value) for gliomas and 0.404 (100% of normal value) for meningiomas (P = .01).

CONCLUSION: The difference in FA decreases in peritumoral normal-appearing WM between gliomas and meningiomas was significant, and the difference in FA decreases in peritumoral hyperintense regions between these tumors approached but did not reach significance. These findings may indicate a role for diffusion MR imaging in the detection of tumoral infiltration that is not visible on conventional MR images.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Brain, diffusion, 10.91 • Brain neoplasms, diagnosis, 10.363, 10.366, 10.38 • Brain neoplasms, MR, 10.121411, 10.121416, 10.12143, 10.12144 • Magnetic resonance (MR), diffusion study, 10.12144




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
W. Wang, C.E. Steward, and P.M. Desmond
Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Glioblastoma Multiforme and Brain Metastases: The Role of p, q, L, and Fractional Anisotropy
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2009; 30(1): 203 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C.-H. Toh, M. Castillo, A.M.-C. Wong, K.-C. Wei, H.-F. Wong, S.-H. Ng, and Y.-L. Wan
Primary Cerebral Lymphoma and Glioblastoma Multiforme: Differences in Diffusion Characteristics Evaluated with Diffusion Tensor Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2008; 29(3): 471 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. G. P. Nucifora, R. Verma, S.-K. Lee, and E. R. Melhem
Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging and Tractography: Exploring Brain Microstructure and Connectivity
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 367 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Kwee, J. P. Ko, C. S. Jiang, M. R. Watters, and M. N. Coel
Solitary Brain Lesions Enhancing at MR Imaging: Evaluation with Fluorine 18 Fluorocholine PET
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 557 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. N. Al-Okaili, J. Krejza, J. H. Woo, R. L. Wolf, D. M. O'Rourke, K. D. Judy, H. Poptani, and E. R. Melhem
Intraaxial Brain Masses: MR Imaging-based Diagnostic Strategy--Initial Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 539 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. Stadlbauer, C. Nimsky, S. Gruber, E. Moser, T. Hammen, T. Engelhorn, M. Buchfelder, and O. Ganslandt
Changes in Fiber Integrity, Diffusivity, and Metabolism of the Pyramidal Tract Adjacent to Gliomas: A Quantitative Diffusion Tensor Fiber Tracking and MR Spectroscopic Imaging Study
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 462 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S.J. Price, R. Jena, N.G. Burnet, P.J. Hutchinson, A.F. Dean, A. Pena, J.D. Pickard, T.A. Carpenter, and J.H. Gillard
Improved Delineation of Glioma Margins and Regions of Infiltration with the Use of Diffusion Tensor Imaging: An Image-Guided Biopsy Study.
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2006; 27(9): 1969 - 1974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Stadlbauer, O. Ganslandt, R. Buslei, T. Hammen, S. Gruber, E. Moser, M. Buchfelder, E. Salomonowitz, and C. Nimsky
Gliomas: Histopathologic Evaluation of Changes in Directionality and Magnitude of Water Diffusion at Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 803 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Provenzale, S. Mukundan, and D. P. Barboriak
Diffusion-weighted and Perfusion MR Imaging for Brain Tumor Characterization and Assessment of Treatment Response.
Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 632 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. M. Hasan and J. Provenzale
Diffusion Tensor Eigenvalues or Both Mean Diffusivity and Fractional Anisotropy Are Required in Quantitative Clinical Diffusion Tensor MR Reports: Fractional Anisotropy Alone Is Not Sufficient.
Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 611 - 613.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Goebell, S. Paustenbach, O. Vaeterlein, X.-Q. Ding, O. Heese, J. Fiehler, T. Kucinski, C. Hagel, M. Westphal, and H. Zeumer
Low-Grade and Anaplastic Gliomas: Differences in Architecture Evaluated with Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 217 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. S. Field
Diffusion Tensor Imaging at the Crossroads: Fiber Tracking Meets Tissue Characterization in Brain Tumors
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2005; 26(9): 2168 - 2169.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
T. P.L. Roberts, F. Liu, A. Kassner, S. Mori, and A. Guha
Fiber Density Index Correlates with Reduced Fractional Anisotropy in White Matter of Patients with Glioblastoma
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2005; 26(9): 2183 - 2186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
G. Akabani, D. A. Reardon, R. E. Coleman, T. Z. Wong, S. D. Metzler, J. E. Bowsher, D. P. Barboriak, J. M. Provenzale, K. L. Greer, D. DeLong, et al.
Dosimetry and Radiographic Analysis of 131I-Labeled Anti-Tenascin 81C6 Murine Monoclonal Antibody in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Malignant Gliomas: A Phase II Study
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2005; 46(6): 1042 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
D. Pauleit, F. Floeth, K. Hamacher, M. J. Riemenschneider, G. Reifenberger, H.-W. Muller, K. Zilles, H. H. Coenen, and K.-J. Langen
O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas
Brain, March 1, 2005; 128(3): 678 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. M. Yousem, S.-K. Lee, D. I. Kim, and J. Kim
Invited Commentary * Authors' Response
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2005; 25(1): 66 - 68.
[Full Text] [PDF]