Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 23, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2322030515
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2322030515v1
232/2/544    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Claussen, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Claussen, C. D.
(Radiology 2004;232:544-553.)
© RSNA, 2004


Thoracic Imaging

Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging—Perfusion Differences in Malignant and Benign Lesions1

Juergen F. Schaefer, MD, Joachim Vollmar, MD, Fritz Schick, MD, PhD, Reinhard Vonthein, PhD, Marcus D. Seemann, MD, Herrmann Aebert, MD, Rainer Dierkesmann, MD, Godehard Friedel, MD and Claus D. Claussen, MD

1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.F.S., J.V., M.D.S., C.D.C.), Section of Experimental Radiology (F.S.), Department of Medical Biometry (R.V.), and Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery (H.A.), Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; and Departments of Pulmonology (R.D.) and Thoracic Surgery (G.F.), Clinic Schillerhoehe, Gerlingen, Germany. From the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received April 1, 2003; revision requested June 19; final revision received November 24; accepted January 5, 2004. Supported by a Fortune grant from the Eberhard Karls University Tübingen. Address correspondence to J.F.S. (e-mail: juergen.schaefer@med.uni-tuebingen.de).

PURPOSE: To determine whether dynamic contrast material–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with use of kinetic and morphologic parameters reveals statistically significant differences between malignant and benign solitary pulmonary nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria of a solitary 5–40-mm pulmonary nodule without calcification or fat at computed tomography. Fifty-one patients were examined successfully; 46 received a histologic diagnosis, and five received a diagnosis by means of observation over 2 years. Dynamic MR images were acquired every 10 seconds for a total of 4 minutes. Diagnostic characteristics for differentiation were examined by using threshold values for maximum peak enhancement, slope of enhancement, and washout. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to test the usefulness of these parameters. The diagnostic performance of a combination of curve profiles and morphologic contrast material distribution were tested by using a decision tree.

RESULTS: Frequency of malignancy was 53% (27 of 51 nodules). Malignant nodules showed stronger enhancement with a higher maximum peak and a faster slope (P < .001). Significant washout (>0.1% increase in signal intensity per second) was found only in malignant lesions (14 of 27 lesions). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 96%, 88%, and 92%, respectively, for maximum peak; 96%, 75%, and 86% for slope; and 52%, 100%, and 75% for washout. When curve profiles and morphologic enhancement patterns were combined, sensitivity increased to 100%.

CONCLUSION: Dynamic MR imaging delineates significant kinetic and morphologic differences in vascularity and perfusion between malignant and benign solitary pulmonary nodules. Washout seems to be highly specific for malignancy.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Lung neoplasms, diagnosis • Lung neoplasms, MR, 60.121412, 60.12143 • Lung, nodule, 60.31, 60.32, 60.33 • Magnetic resonance (MR), perfusion study, 60.121412, 60.12144




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Girvin and J. P. Ko
Pulmonary Nodules: Detection, Assessment, and CAD
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1057 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Satoh, Y. Kitazume, S. Ohdama, Y. Kimula, S. Taura, and Y. Endo
Can Malignant and Benign Pulmonary Nodules Be Differentiated with Diffusion-Weighted MRI?
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 464 - 470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. Zou, M. Zhang, Q. Wang, D. Shang, L. Wang, and G. Yu
Quantitative Investigation of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Histopathologic Analysis
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 252 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. A Yi, K. S. Lee, J. Han, M. P. Chung, M. J. Chung, and K. M. Shin
3-T MRI for Differentiating Inflammation- and Fibrosis-Predominant Lesions of Usual and Nonspecific Interstitial Pneumonia: Comparison Study with Pathologic Correlation
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 878 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. Cronin, B. A. Dwamena, A. M. Kelly, and R. C. Carlos
Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Meta-analytic Comparison of Cross-sectional Imaging Modalities for Diagnosis of Malignancy
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 772 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Y. Donmez, E. Yekeler, V. Saeidi, A. Tunaci, M. Tunaci, and G. Acunas
Dynamic Contrast Enhancement Patterns of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules on 3D Gradient-Recalled Echo MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1380 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. A Yi, T. Y. Jeon, K. S. Lee, J. H. Lee, J. B. Seo, Y. K. Kim, and M. J. Chung
3-T MRI: Usefulness for Evaluating Primary Lung Cancer and Small Nodules in Lobes Not Containing Primary Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): 386 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Kono, K. Fujimoto, H. Terasaki, N. L. Muller, S. Kato, J. Sadohara, N. Hayabuchi, and S. Takamori
Dynamic MRI of Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Comparison of Enhancement Patterns of Malignant and Benign Small Peripheral Lung Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 26 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. d. Baere, J. Palussiere, A. Auperin, A. Hakime, M. Abdel-Rehim, M. Kind, C. Dromain, A. Ravaud, N. Tebboune, V. Boige, et al.
Midterm Local Efficacy and Survival after Radiofrequency Ablation of Lung Tumors with Minimum Follow-up of 1 Year: Prospective Evaluation.
Radiology, August 1, 2006; 240(2): 587 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. K. Shankar and D. C. Sullivan
Functional Imaging in Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2005; 23(14): 3203 - 3211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]