HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2322030976v1 232/2/592    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dunn, T. C. Articles by Majumdar, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dunn, T. C. Articles by Majumdar, S.

T2 Relaxation Time of Cartilage at MR Imaging: Comparison with Severity of Knee Osteoarthritis¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (T.C.D., Y.L., H.J., S.M.) and Orthopaedic Surgery (M.D.R., S.M.), University of California at San Francisco, 185 Berry St, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107-1739. Received June 20, 2003; revision requested August 29; final revision received December 19; accepted January 13, 2004. Supported by NIH grant R01 AR46905. Address correspondence to T.C.D. (e-mail: tcdunn@mrsc.ucsf.edu).

PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in T2 values in femoral and tibial cartilage at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with varying degrees of osteoarthritis (OA) compared with healthy subjects and to develop a mapping and display method based on calculation of T2 z scores for visual grading and assessment of cartilage heterogeneity in patients with OA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Knee cartilage was evaluated in 55 subjects who were categorized with radiography as healthy (n = 7) or as having mild OA (n = 20) or severe OA (n = 28). Cartilage regions were determined with manual segmentation of an MR image acquired with spoiled gradients and fat suppression. The segmentation was applied to a map of T2 relaxation time and was analyzed in four knee cartilage compartments (ie, the medial and lateral tibia and femur). Differences between cartilage compartment T2 values and subject groups were analyzed with analysis of covariance. Correlations of cartilage T2 values with clinically reported symptoms and cartilage thickness and volume were examined. Cartilage T2 values were converted to z scores per voxel on the basis of normal population values in the same cartilage compartment to better interpret cartilage heterogeneity and variation from normal.

RESULTS: Healthy subjects had mean T2 values of 32.1–35.0 msec, while patients with mild and severe OA had mean T2 values of 34.4–41.0 msec. All cartilage compartments except the lateral tibia showed significant (P < .05) increases in T2 relaxation time between healthy and diseased knees; however, no significant difference was found between patients with mild and severe OA. Correlation of T2 values with clinical symptoms and cartilage morphology was found predominantly in medial compartments.

CONCLUSION: Femoral and medial tibial cartilage T2 values increase with the severity of OA.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Cartilage, MR, 452.121411 • Knee, arthritis, 452.7 • Knee, MR, 452.121411 • Magnetic resonance (MR), tissue characterization, 452.121411

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Rauscher, R. Stahl, J. Cheng, X. Li, M. B. Huber, A. Luke, S. Majumdar, and T. M. Link Meniscal Measurements of T1{rho} and T2 at MR Imaging in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Osteoarthritis Radiology, November 1, 2008; 249(2): 591 - 600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. H. Welsch, T. C. Mamisch, S. E. Domayer, R. Dorotka, F. Kutscha-Lissberg, S. Marlovits, L. M. White, and S. Trattnig Cartilage T2 Assessment at 3-T MR Imaging: In Vivo Differentiation of Normal Hyaline Cartilage from Reparative Tissue after Two Cartilage Repair Procedures--Initial Experience Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 154 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Saupe, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, M. R. Schmid, T. Schertler, M. Manestar, and D. Weishaupt MR Imaging of Cartilage in Cadaveric Wrists: Comparison between Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T and Gross Pathologic Inspection Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 180 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Bauer, S. J. Krause, C. J. Ross, R. Krug, J. Carballido-Gamio, E. Ozhinsky, S. Majumdar, and T. M. Link Volumetric Cartilage Measurements of Porcine Knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR Imaging: Evaluation of Precision and Accuracy. Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 399 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. White, M. S. Sussman, M. Hurtig, L. Probyn, G. Tomlinson, and R. Kandel Cartilage T2 Assessment: Differentiation of Normal Hyaline Cartilage and Reparative Tissue after Arthroscopic Cartilage Repair in Equine Subjects. Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 407 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. G. Potter and L. F. Foo Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Trauma, Degeneration, and Repair Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2006; 34(4): 661 - 677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]