HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental tables All Versions of this Article: 2323030899v1 232/3/749    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mayo, J. R. Articles by Vedal, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mayo, J. R. Articles by Vedal, S.

Reduced Radiation Dose Helical Chest CT: Effect on Reader Evaluation of Structures and Lung Findings¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9 (J.R.M., H.O.C.); Department of Radiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Korea (K.I.K.); Department of Radiology, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand (S.L.S.M.); Department of Radiology, Osaka University Medical School, Japan (T.J.); Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (P.K.); and Department of Radiology, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, Colo (S.V.). Received June 6, 2003; revision requested August 20; revision received November 18; accepted January 12, 2004. Address correspondence to J.R.M. (e-mail: jmayo@vanhosp.bc.ca).

PURPOSE: To assess, by using computer simulation, the effect of the use of reduced computed tomographic (CT) tube current on reader evaluation of structures and lung findings on images obtained at clinically indicated chest CT examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The noise level in the raw scan data of 150 clinically indicated conventional tube current (200–320-mA) chest CT examinations was modified to simulate tube current reduction to 100 and to 40 mA. A total of 450 image sets were thus available. Four radiologists blinded to the tube current used assessed the image sets in random order for 14 structures and lung findings and ranked subjective image quality by using a five-point scale (1 = nondiagnostic, 2 = inferior, 3 = adequate, 4 = good, 5 = excellent). After a 3-week interval, the 150 conventional tube current image sets were rescored so that intraobserver agreement could be assessed. The McNemar statistic was used to determine whether there were more scoring disagreements between interpretations of the conventional and those of the reduced tube current scans or between the two interpretations of the conventional tube current scans.

RESULTS: When overall agreement for 14 structures and lung findings was pooled over four observers, significantly more disagreements (P < .05) were seen when scores were compared between conventional and reduced tube current scans than when scores were compared between repeated interpretations of the conventional tube current scans. There was a significant decrease (P < .05) in the subjective image quality of reduced tube current scans compared with the subjective image quality of conventional tube current scans.

CONCLUSION: These data indicate that reduced tube current does affect reader evaluation of structures and lung findings and reduces a reader’s subjective assessment of image quality.

Supplemental material: radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2323030899/DC1.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), image quality, 60.12115 • Computed tomography (CT), radiation exposure, 60.12115 • Radiations, exposure to patients and personnel • Thorax, CT, 60.12115

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Kubo, P.-J. P. Lin, W. Stiller, M. Takahashi, H.-U. Kauczor, Y. Ohno, and H. Hatabu Radiation Dose Reduction in Chest CT: A Review Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 335 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. MacKenzie, J. Nazario-Larrieu, T. Cai, M. S. Ledbetter, M. A. Duran-Mendicuti, P. F. Judy, and F. J. Rybicki Reduced-Dose CT: Effect on Reader Evaluation in Detection of Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1371 - 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Bankier, C. Schaefer-Prokop, V. De Maertelaer, D. Tack, P. Jaksch, W. Klepetko, and P. A. Gevenois Air Trapping: Comparison of Standard-Dose and Simulated Low-Dose Thin-Section CT Techniques Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 898 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. K. Yousefzadeh, M. B. Ward, and C. Reft Internal Barium Shielding to Minimize Fetal Irradiation in Spiral Chest CT: A Phantom Simulation Experiment. Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 751 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. Parker, F. K. Hui, M. A. Camacho, J. K. Chung, D. W. Broga, and N. N. Sethi Female Breast Radiation Exposure During CT Pulmonary Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2005; 185(5): 1228 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]