|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cardiac Imaging |
1 From the Department of Cardiology, German Heart Institute Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany (A.W., I.P., S.R., C.K., E.F., E.N.); Department of Cardiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center Bern, Bern, Switzerland (A.W.); and Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Osnabrueck-Bad Rothenfelde, Osnabrueck-Bad Rothenfelde, Germany (S.R.). Received March 25, 2003; revision requested June 18; final revision received February 6, 2004; accepted February 17. A.W. supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Swiss Foundation for Grants in Medicine and Biology. Address correspondence to E.N. (e-mail: eike.nagel@dhzb.de).
PURPOSE: To determine the value of high-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for diagnosis of ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who had undergone revascularization and have wall motion abnormalities at rest, with quantitative invasive coronary angiography serving as reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty consecutive patients (mean age, 59 years ± 8 [standard deviation]) who had undergone revascularization for CAD and have wall motion abnormalities at rest underwent stress cardiovascular MR imaging prior to clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography. Turbo gradient-echo MR images were acquired at rest and during a standardized high-dose dobutamine-atropine protocol with three short-axis and two long-axis views. Regional wall motion was assessed by a blinded observer by using a 16-segment model and a four-point scoring system. New or worsening wall motion abnormality in at least one segment was considered positive for myocardial ischemia.
RESULTS: Significant CAD (stenoses of at least 50% diameter at angiography) was found in 119 patients (74%). Target heart rate was not reached in nine patients (6%). Overall sensitivity and specificity for detection of significant CAD were 89% and 84%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was 88%, and positive and negative predictive values were 94% and 73%, respectively. Overall sensitivity for detection of significant CAD in patients with single-, double-, and triple-vessel disease was 87%, 88%, and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: High-dose stress cardiovascular MR imaging can be used for follow-up of patients after coronary revascularization procedures. Diagnostic accuracy is similar to stress cardiovascular MR imaging data for patients suspected of having CAD and compares favorably with that of other established noninvasive techniques.
Supplemental material: radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2331030463/DC1.
© RSNA, 2004
Index terms: Coronary angiography, comparative studies, 54.1244 Coronary vessels, MR, 54.121412, 54.12142, 54.12143 Coronary vessels, stenosis or obstruction Heart, ischemia, 51.1939 Magnetic resonance (MR), cine study, 54.12149
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W P Bandettini and A E Arai Advances in clinical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging Heart, November 1, 2008; 94(11): 1485 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 23, 2007; 50(17): e159 - e242. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Fleisher, J. A. Beckman, K. A. Brown, H. Calkins, E. L. Chaikof, K. E. Fleischmann, W. K. Freeman, J. B. Froehlich, E. K. Kasper, J. R. Kersten, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): e418 - e500. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Jahnke, E. Nagel, R. Gebker, T. Kokocinski, S. Kelle, R. Manka, E. Fleck, and I. Paetsch Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Tests: Adenosine Stress Perfusion and Dobutamine Stress Wall Motion Imaging Circulation, April 3, 2007; 115(13): 1769 - 1776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Jahnke, I. Paetsch, R. Gebker, A. Bornstedt, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel Accelerated 4D Dobutamine Stress MR Imaging with k-t BLAST: Feasibility and Diagnostic Performance Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 718 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Paetsch, C. Jahnke, V. A. Ferrari, F. E. Rademakers, P. A. Pellikka, W. G. Hundley, D. Poldermans, J. J. Bax, K. Wegscheider, E. Fleck, et al. Determination of interobserver variability for identifying inducible left ventricular wall motion abnormalities during dobutamine stress magnetic resonance imaging Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2006; 27(12): 1459 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Paetsch, C. Jahnke, E. Fleck, and E. Nagel Current clinical applications of stress wall motion analysis with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging Eur J Echocardiogr, October 1, 2005; 6(5): 317 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |