Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print September 16, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2332031111
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2332031111v1
233/2/449    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deserno, W. M. L. L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Barentsz, J. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deserno, W. M. L. L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Barentsz, J. O.
(Radiology 2004;233:449-456.)
© RSNA, 2004


Genitourinary Imaging

Urinary Bladder Cancer: Preoperative Nodal Staging with Ferumoxtran-10–enhanced MR Imaging1

Willem M. L. L. G. Deserno, MD, MSc, Mukesh G. Harisinghani, MD, Matthias Taupitz, MD, PhD, Gerrit J. Jager, MD, PhD, J. Alfred Witjes, MD, PhD, Peter F. Mulders, MD, PhD, Christina A. Hulsbergen van de Kaa, MD, PhD, D. Kaufmann, MD and Jelle O. Barentsz, MD, PhD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (W.M.L.L.G.D., G.J.J., J.O.B.), Urology (J.A.W., P.F.M.), and Pathology (C.A.H.v.d.K.), University Medical Center Sint Radboud, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Departments of Radiology (M.G.H.) and Oncology (D.K.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; and Department of Radiology, Charité Hospital Berlin, Germany (M.T.). Received July 15, 2003; revision requested September 18; final revision received February 24, 2004; accepted March 16. Address correspondence to W.M.L.L.G.D. (e-mail: w.deserno@rad.umcn.nl).

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate ferumoxtran-10–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for nodal staging in patients with urinary bladder cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with proved bladder cancer were enrolled. Results of MR imaging performed before and after injection of ferumoxtran-10 were compared with histopathologic results in surgically removed lymph nodes. High-spatial-resolution three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo (voxel size, 1.4 x 1.4 x 1.4 mm) and T2*-weighted gradient-echo (voxel size, 0.8 x 0.8 x 3.0 mm) sequences were performed before and 24 hours after injection of ferumoxtran-10 (2.6 mg iron per kilogram of body weight). On precontrast images, lymph nodes were defined as malignant by using size and shape criteria (round node, >8 mm; oval, >10 mm axial diameter). On postcontrast images, nodes were considered benign if there was homogeneous decrease in signal intensity and malignant if decrease was absent or heterogeneous. Qualitative evaluation was performed on a node-to-node basis. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and accuracy were evaluated with logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS: In 58 patients, 172 nodes imaged with use of ferumoxtran-10 were matched and correlated with results of node dissection. Of these, 122 were benign and 50 were malignant. With nodal size and shape criteria, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values on precontrast images were 92%, 76%, 99%, 97%, and 91%, respectively; corresponding values on postcontrast images were 95%, 96%, 95%, 89%, and 98%. In the depiction of pelvic metastases, sensitivity and negative predictive value improved significantly at postcontrast compared with those at precontrast imaging, from 76% to 96% (P < .001) and from 91% to 98% (P < .01), respectively. At postcontrast imaging, metastases (4–9 mm) were prospectively found in 10 of 12 normal-sized nodes (<10 mm); these metastases were not detected on precontrast images. Postcontrast images also showed lymph nodes that were missed at pelvic node dissection in two patients.

CONCLUSION: Ferumoxtran-10–enhanced MR imaging significantly improves nodal staging in patients with bladder cancer by depicting metastases even in normal-sized lymph nodes.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Bladder neoplasms, metastases, 83.31, 83.33 • Bladder neoplasms, MR, 83.12141 • Iron • Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast media




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ImagingHome page
N Bharwani, N J Stephens, and S D Heenan
Imaging of bladder cancer
Imaging, June 1, 2008; 20(2): 97 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. S. Park, J. M. Lee, J.-Y. Choi, M. W. Lee, H. J. Kim, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi
Preoperative Evaluation of Bile Duct Cancer: MRI Combined with MR Cholangiopancreatography Versus MDCT with Direct Cholangiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 396 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. D. Purcell, F. V. Coakley, B. L. Franc, R. A. Hawkins, S. E. Boddington, and B. M. Yeh
Anterior Layering of Excreted 18F-FDG in the Bladder on PET/CT: Frequency and Cause
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2007; 189(2): W96 - W99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
D. A. Torigian, S. S. Huang, M. Houseni, and A. Alavi
Functional Imaging of Cancer with Emphasis on Molecular Techniques
CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2007; 57(4): 206 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Rubaltelli, S. Corradin, A. Dorigo, A. Tregnaghi, F. Adami, C. R. Rossi, and R. Stramare
Automated Quantitative Evaluation of Lymph Node Perfusion on Contrast-Enhanced Sonography
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 977 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Memarsadeghi, C. C. Riedl, A. Kaneider, A. Galid, M. Rudas, W. Matzek, and T. H. Helbich
Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Patients with Breast Carcinomas: Assessment with Nonenhanced versus USPIO-enhanced MR Imaging.
Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 367 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Schnall and M. Rosen
Primer on Imaging Technologies for Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2006; 24(20): 3225 - 3233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. A. M. Heesakkers, J. J. Futterer, A. M. Hovels, H. C. M. van den Bosch, T. W. J. Scheenen, Y. L. Hoogeveen, and J. O. Barentsz
Prostate Cancer Evaluated with Ferumoxtran-10-enhanced T2*-weighted MR Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: Early Experience.
Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 481 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. J. Wong-You-Cheong, P. J. Woodward, M. A. Manning, and I. A. Sesterhenn
From the Archives of the AFIP: Neoplasms of the Urinary Bladder: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2006; 26(2): 553 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. K. Singh, A. Saokar, P. F. Hahn, and M. G. Harisinghani
Imaging of Penile Neoplasms
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2005; 25(6): 1629 - 1638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.