HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Richards, J. R. Articles by McGahan, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Richards, J. R. Articles by McGahan, J. P.

Blunt Abdominal Injury in the Pregnant Patient: Detection with US¹

¹ From the Division of Emergency Medicine (J.R.R.) and Department of Radiology (E.L.O., M.A.G., J.P.M.), University of California, Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95817; and School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington DC (M.V.R.). Received October 17, 2003; revision requested January 12, 2004; revision received February 20; accepted March 26. Address correspondence to J.R.R. (e-mail: jrrichards@ucdavis.edu).

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) for the detection of blunt intraabdominal injury in pregnant patients and to compare differences between pregnant and nonpregnant patients of childbearing age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of results of all consecutive emergency blunt trauma US examinations performed at a level I trauma center from January 1995 to June 2002 was conducted. Data on demographics, free fluid location, and patient outcome were collected. Injuries were determined on the basis of results of computed tomography and/or laparotomy. The Student t test was used to detect differences between continuous variables, and ² analysis was used to evaluate differences between proportions.

RESULTS: A total of 2319 US examinations for blunt trauma were performed in girls and women between the ages of 10 and 50 years. There were 328 pregnant patients, 23 of whom had intraabdominal injury. The mean age of the pregnant patients was 24.7 years ± 6.1 (standard deviation) (age range, 14–42 years). In pregnant patients, the sensitivity of US was 61% (14 of 23 patients), the specificity was 94.4% (288 of 305 patients), and the accuracy was 92.1% (302 of 328 patients). Pregnant patients were significantly more likely to have sustained injuries from assault (odds ratio: 2.6, P < .001). The most common pattern of free fluid accumulation detected at US in pregnant patients was that of fluid in the left and right upper quadrants and pelvis (n = 4, 29%); the second most common pattern was one of isolated pelvic fluid (n = 3, 21%).

CONCLUSION: For detection of intraabdominal injury, US was less sensitive in pregnant patients than in nonpregnant patients but was highly specific in both subgroups. The sensitivity of US was highest in pregnant patients during the first trimester.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Abdomen, injuries, 70.41, 80.41 • Abdomen, US, 70.1298, 80.1298 • Emergency radiology • Pregnancy, US

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. R Cunningham FAST Scan: Ultrasound's Role in Trauma Radiol. Technol., May 1, 2008; 79(5): 455 - 458. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Patel, D. L. Reede, D. S. Katz, R. Subramaniam, and J. K. Amorosa Imaging the Pregnant Patient for Nonobstetric Conditions: Algorithms and Radiation Dose Considerations RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1705 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. G. ODLE Blunt Pelvic Trauma Radiol. Technol., January 1, 2006; 77(3): 200 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]