Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print September 9, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2332031219
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2332031219v1
233/2/486    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mengiardi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zanetti, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mengiardi, B.
Right arrow Articles by Zanetti, M.
(Radiology 2004;233:486-492.)
© RSNA, 2004


Musculoskeletal Imaging

Frozen Shoulder: MR Arthrographic Findings1

Bernard Mengiardi, MD, Christian W. A. Pfirrmann, MD, Christian Gerber, MD, Jürg Hodler, MD and Marco Zanetti, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (B.M., C.W.A.P., J.H., M.Z.) and Orthopedic Surgery (C.G.), Orthopedic University Clinic Balgrist, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland. Received July 31, 2003; revision requested October 17; final revision received February 10, 2004; accepted March 18. Address correspondence to B.M. (e-mail: mengiardi@yahoo.de).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the magnetic resonance (MR) arthrographic findings in patients with frozen shoulder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative MR arthrograms of 22 patients (six women, 16 men; mean age, 54.7 years) with frozen shoulder treated with arthroscopic capsulotomy were compared with arthrograms of 22 age- and sex-matched control subjects without frozen shoulder. The thickness of the coracohumeral ligament (CHL) and the joint capsule, as well as the volume of the axillary recess, were measured (Mann-Whitney test). Abnormalities in the CHL, subcoracoid fat, superior glenohumeral ligament, superior border of the subscapularis tendon, long biceps tendon, and subscapularis recess were analyzed in consensus by two blinded radiologists ({chi}2 test).

RESULTS: Patients with frozen shoulder had a significantly thickened CHL (4.1 mm vs 2.7 mm in controls) and a thickened joint capsule in the rotator cuff interval (7.1 mm vs 4.5 mm; P < .001 for both comparisons, Mann-Whitney test) but not in the axillary recess. The volume of the axillary recess was significantly smaller in patients with frozen shoulder than in control subjects (P = .03, Mann-Whitney test). Thickening of the CHL to 4 mm or more had a specificity of 95% and a sensitivity of 59% for diagnosis of frozen shoulder. Thickening of the capsule in the rotator cuff interval to 7 mm or more had a specificity of 86% and a sensitivity of 64%. Synovitis-like abnormalities at the superior border of the subscapularis tendon were significantly more common in patients with frozen shoulder than in control subjects (P = .014, {chi}2 test). Complete obliteration of the fat triangle between the CHL and the coracoid process (subcoracoid triangle sign) was specific (100%) but not sensitive (32%).

CONCLUSION: Thickening of the CHL and the joint capsule in the rotator cuff interval, as well as the subcoracoid triangle sign, are characteristic MR arthrographic findings in frozen shoulder.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Magnetic resonance (MR), arthrography, 414.121411, 414.12143 • Shoulder, abnormalities, 414.252, 414.253, 414.4814, 414.4819 • Shoulder, anatomy, 414.92 • Shoulder, arthritis, 414.70




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. M. Hall, B. Mengiardi, and M. Zanetti
Frozen Shoulder * Drs Mengiardi and Zanetti respond:
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 713 - 714.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.