Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2332031796
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tigges, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schulman, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tigges, S.
Right arrow Articles by Schulman, D. A.
(Radiology 2004;233:575-578.)
© RSNA, 2004


Thoracic Imaging

Routine Chest Radiography in a Primary Care Setting1

Stefan Tigges, MD, MSCR, David L. Roberts, MD, Kay H. Vydareny, MD and David A. Schulman, MD, MPH

1 From the Departments of Radiology (S.T., K.H.V.), Internal Medicine (D.L.R.), and Pulmonary Medicine (D.A.S.), Emory Clinic, Bldg A, 1365 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30322. Received November 11, 2003; revision requested February 3, 2004; final revision received April 18; accepted April 21. Address correspondence to S.T. (e-mail: stefan_tigges@emoryhealthcare.org).

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency, diagnostic yield, outcomes, cost, and rate of false-positive results of routine chest radiography performed in asymptomatic patients in the primary care setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiography reports on all patients who underwent routine or screening posteroanterior and lateral chest radiography at a university-affiliated primary care clinic in 2001 were reviewed. Radiographic results were coded as normal or minor findings or as major abnormalities, such as pulmonary nodules, requiring further diagnostic evaluation. Outcomes of patients with major abnormalities were established by using chart reviews or reviewing additional radiographs. Costs were estimated by using 2002 Medicare reimbursement rates. The main measures assessed were frequency, costs, and rate of false-positive results of routine chest radiography.

RESULTS: Of 3812 radiographs obtained at the primary care clinic, 1282 (34%) were ordered for routine or screening purposes by the referring physician. Nine hundred twenty-two radiographs were obtained in male patients and 360 were obtained in female patients; their mean and median age was 49 years (age range, 4–87 years). Fifteen chest radiographs showed major abnormalities. No patient younger than 40 years had a major abnormality. Fourteen of the 15 findings of major abnormalities proved to be false-positive. No disease requiring treatment was diagnosed as a result of radiographic findings. The total cost for follow-up radiography and computed tomography was $46 609.49.

CONCLUSION: Routine chest radiography has low diagnostic yield in asymptomatic primary care patients.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Cancer screening • Cost-effectiveness • Radiology and radiologists, socioeconomic issues • Thorax, radiography, 68.11




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
radtechHome page
T. R. WILKINS and R. L. WILKINS
Clinical and Radiographic Evidence of Pneumonia
Radiol. Technol., November 1, 2005; 77(2): 106 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. O. Stolberg and S. Tigges
Comments on Routine Chest Radiography * Dr Tigges responds:
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 368 - 368.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.