Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 29, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2333031921
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2333031921v1
233/3/768    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by El-Khoury, G. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Saltzman, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by El-Khoury, G. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Saltzman, C. L.
(Radiology 2004;233:768-773.)
© RSNA, 2004


Experimental Studies

Cartilage Thickness in Cadaveric Ankles: Measurement with Double-Contrast Multi–Detector Row CT Arthrography versus MR Imaging1

Georges Y. El-Khoury, MD, Kyle J. Alliman, BS, Hannah J. Lundberg, BS, Melvin J. Rudert, PhD, Thomas D. Brown, PhD and Charles L. Saltzman, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (G.Y.E.) and Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation (K.J.A., H.J.L., M.J.R., T.D.B., C.L.S.), University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA 52242. From the 2003 RSNA scientific assembly. Received November 26, 2003; revision requested January 21, 2004; revision received February 12; accepted March 23. Supported by the National Institutes of Health Specialized Center for Research on Osteoarthritis (NIAMS) (award number: 5 P50 AR048939). Address correspondence to G.Y.E. (e-mail: george-el-khoury@uiowa.edu).

PURPOSE: To test the accuracy of double-contrast multi–detector row computed tomographic (CT) arthrography for measurement of cartilage thickness in cadaveric ankles and to compare this technique with three-dimensional (3D) fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo in the steady state (FS-SPGR) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five cadaveric ankles were used. In the ankle specimens, five to nine 1.5-mm-diameter holes were drilled across the joint traversing the tibial subchondral bone, tibial articular cartilage, talar dome cartilage, and talar subchondral bone. The ankle specimens were obtained and used according to institutional policies. Each ankle specimen was imaged first by using 3D FS-SPGR MR imaging with a 1.5-T magnet and then by using double-contrast arthrography followed by CT with a four–detector row scanner (ie, double-contrast multi–detector row CT arthrography). The section thickness used for CT scanning was 1.0 mm reconstructed in 0.5-mm intervals. The MR and CT images obtained in the five specimens were then downloaded to a workstation, where a measurement tool was used to measure the cartilage thickness at each hole. The physical measurement of cartilage thickness at each hole was used as the reference standard with which the MR imaging and CT measurements were compared. Linear regression and correlation analyses were performed by using a statistical computer program.

RESULTS: Double-contrast arthrography followed by multi–detector row CT, as compared with 3D FS-SPGR MR imaging, enabled more accurate measurement of the physical cartilage thickness in the ankle (P < .001).

CONCLUSION: In this study of five cadaveric ankles, multi–detector row CT arthrography was more accurate than 3D FS-SPGR MR imaging for measurement of articular cartilage thickness in the ankle.

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Ankle, arthrography, 461.1211, 461.122, 463.1211, 463.122 • Ankle, MR, 461.121412, 461.121415, 463.121412, 463.121415 • Arthritis, degenerative, 461.77, 463.77 • Cartilage, MR, 461.121412, 461.121415, 463.121412, 463.121415




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
L. B. Chou, M. T. Coughlin, S. Hansen Jr, A. Haskell, G. Lundeen, C. L. Saltzman, and R. A. Mann
Osteoarthritis of the Ankle: The Role of Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., May 1, 2008; 16(5): 249 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. E. Anderson, B. J. Ellis, C. L. Peters, and J. A. Weiss
Cartilage Thickness: Factors Influencing Multidetector CT Measurements in a Phantom Study
Radiology, January 1, 2008; 246(1): 133 - 141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Wyler, V. Bousson, C. Bergot, M. Polivka, E. Leveque, E. Vicaut, and J.-D. Laredo
Hyaline Cartilage Thickness in Radiographically Normal Cadaveric Hips: Comparison of Spiral CT Arthrographic and Macroscopic Measurements
Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 441 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.