|
|
||||||||
Technical Developments |
1 From the Department of RadiologyMRI, New York University Medical Center, 530 First Ave, New York, NY 10016 (A.G., V.S.L.); and Siemens Medical Solutions, Chicago, Ill (Y.C.C., J.S.B., O.P.S.). Received December 10, 2003; revision requested February 19, 2004; revision received February 23; accepted March 23. Supported by a Seed Grant from the Society of Thoracic Radiology and a New York University General Clinical Research Center Medical Student Grant. Address correspondence to V.S.L. (e-mail: vivian.lee@med.nyu.edu).
Seventeen patients underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for myocardial viability with a protocol approved by the institutional review board and gave written informed consent. Breath-hold cine inversion-recovery segmented k-space true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence, referred to as inversion time (TI) mapping, was performed to determine optimal TI for myocardial infarction inversion-recovery imaging. From TI mapping, optimal TI was 180315 msec 1015 minutes after administration of 0.15 mmol/kg of gadolinium-based contrast material. At that optimal TI, relative signal intensity of infarcted myocardium compared with uninfarcted myocardium was maximal (mean ± standard deviation, 297.8% ± 86.5), whereas signal-to-noise ratio of uninfarcted myocardium was minimal (4.5 ± 1.2). When applied to conventional myocardial infarction inversion-recovery imaging, optimal TI resulted in nulling of signal intensity of uninfarcted myocardium in all patients and in excellent conspicuity of infarcted myocardium in all nine patients with visible infarction.
© RSNA, 2004
Index terms: Magnetic resonance (MR), contrast enhancement Magnetic resonance (MR), inversion recovery, 51.121413 Myocardium, infarction, 51.771
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. M. Rofsky Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis: Considerations for the Cardiologist J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2008; 1(4): 457 - 459. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Goldfarb, S. Arnold, and J. Han Recent Myocardial Infarction: Assessment with Unenhanced T1-weighted MR Imaging Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 245 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. S. Lee, H. Rusinek, L. Bokacheva, A. J. Huang, N. Oesingmann, Q. Chen, M. Kaur, K. Prince, T. Song, E. L. Kramer, et al. Renal function measurements from MR renography and a simplified multicompartmental model Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): F1548 - F1559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Baks, F. Cademartiri, A. D. Moelker, A. C. Weustink, R.-J. van Geuns, N. R. Mollet, G. P. Krestin, D. J. Duncker, and P. J. de Feyter Multislice Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Assessment of Reperfused Acute Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 4, 2006; 48(1): 144 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dewey, M. Laule, M. Taupitz, N. Kaufels, B. Hamm, and D. Kivelitz Myocardial Viability: Assessment with Three-dimensional MR Imaging in Pigs and Patients Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 703 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |