Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print October 14, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2333030826
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2333030826v1
233/3/927    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hofmann, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Schoepf, U. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hofmann, L. K.
Right arrow Articles by Schoepf, U. J.
(Radiology 2004;233:927-933.)
© RSNA, 2004


Technical Developments

Electrocardiographically Gated 16-Section CT of the Thorax: Cardiac Motion Suppression1

Lars K. Hofmann, MD, Kelly H. Zou, PhD, Philip Costello, MD and U. Joseph Schoepf, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (L.K.H., K.H.Z., P.C., U.J.S.); Siemens Medical Solutions, Division CT, Forchheim, Germany (L.K.H.); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (K.H.Z.); and Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 169 Ashley Ave, Charleston, SC 29425 (P.C., U.J.S.). From the 2002 RSNA scientific assembly. Received May 27, 2003; revision requested August 7; revision received January 20, 2004; accepted February 17. L.K.H. supported by the Medical Image Processing Laboratory, Muelheim, Germany. U.J.S. supported by a research grant from Berlex Laboratories, Wayne, NJ. Address correspondence to U.J.S. (e-mail: schoepf@musc.edu).

Thirty patients underwent 16-section multi–detector row computed tomographic (CT) angiography of the thorax with retrospective electrocardiographic gating. Institutional review board approval was obtained for retrospective analysis of CT scan data and records; patient informed consent was not required. Images reconstructed at six different time points (0%, 20%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 80%) within the R-R interval on the electrocardiogram were analyzed by two radiologists for diagnostic quality, to identify suitable reconstruction intervals for optimal suppression of cardiac motion. Five regions of interest (left coronary artery, aortic root, ascending and descending aorta, pulmonary arteries) were evaluated. Best image quality was achieved by referencing image reconstruction to middiastole (50%–60%) for the left coronary artery, aortic root, and ascending aorta. The pulmonary arteries are best displayed during mid- to late diastole (80%).

© RSNA, 2004

Index terms: Aorta, CT, 56.12116, 94.12116 • Computed tomography (CT), angiography, 53.12116, 54.12116, 56.12116, 94.12116 • Coronary vessels, CT, 54.12116 • Pulmonary arteries, CT, 564.12116, 944.12116




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Fellah, F. Waignein, X. Wittebole, and E. Coche
Combined Assessment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis and Pulmonary Septic Embolism with ECG-Gated 40-MDCT of the Whole Chest
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): W228 - W230.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. J. Schoepf, P. L. Zwerner, G. Savino, C. Herzog, J. M. Kerl, and P. Costello
Coronary CT Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 48 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Herzog, S. A. Nguyen, G. Savino, P. L. Zwerner, J. Doll, C. D. Nielsen, T. G. Flohr, T. J. Vogl, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
Does Two-Segment Image Reconstruction at 64-Section CT Coronary Angiography Improve Image Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy?
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 121 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. I. Ha, H. W. Goo, J. B. Seo, J.-W. Song, and J. S. Lee
Effects of high-resolution CT of the lung using partial versus full reconstruction on motion artifacts and image noise.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 618 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Y. Onuma, K. Tanabe, G. Nakazawa, J. Aoki, H. Nakajima, K. Ibukuro, and K. Hara
Noncardiac Findings in Cardiac Imaging With Multidetector Computed Tomography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 18, 2006; 48(2): 402 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
V. D. Raptopoulos, P. B. Boiselle, N. Michailidis, J. Handwerker, A. Sabir, J. A. Edlow, I. Pedrosa, and J. B. Kruskal
MDCT Angiography of Acute Chest Pain: Evaluation of ECG-Gated and Nongated Techniques
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6_Supplement_2): S346 - S356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2004 by the Radiological Society of North America.