HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2341031692v1 234/1/143    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bub, L. D. Articles by Lomoschitz, F. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bub, L. D. Articles by Lomoschitz, F. M.

Cervical Spine Fractures in Patients 65 Years and Older: A Clinical Prediction Rule for Blunt Trauma¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Box 357115, 1959 NE Pacific St, RR 215, Seattle, WA 98195-7115 (L.D.B., C.C.B., F.A.M.); Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, Seattle, Wash (C.C.B.); and the Department of Radiology, University of Vienna, Austria (F.M.L.). From the 2003 RSNA Scientific Assembly. Received October 19, 2003; revision requested January 12, 2004; revision received March 5; accepted April 8. C.C.B. supported in part by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality grant K08 HS11291. Address correspondence to L.D.B. (e-mail: lbub@u.washington.edu).

PURPOSE: To determine clinical predictors of cervical spine fracture in the elderly and to develop a clinical prediction rule to guide appropriate imaging in high-risk patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was received with waiver of informed consent. A retrospective case-control study was performed on blunt trauma patients 65 years and older with cervical spine fractures and on randomly selected control subjects without fracture. Potential predictors of fracture were evaluated through simple and multivariate logistic regression. Simple predictors were grouped into clinically similar composite variables and were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression and recursive partitioning. A clinical prediction rule was generated. The receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated and adjusted through bootstrap validation. Absolute cervical spine fracture probabilities were calculated by using Bayes theorem for all elderly patients and for patients who underwent computed tomography. Results were compared with a previous prediction rule for all adults.

RESULTS: Composite predictors of fracture in the elderly included focal neurologic deficit (adjusted odds ratio, 17.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8, 83.4), severe head injury (odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI: 1.5, 7.1), high-energy mechanism (odds ratio 6.7; 95% CI: 3.1, 14.8), and moderate-energy mechanism (odds ratio 3.3; 95% CI: 1.3, 8.3). The prediction rule stratified patients into risk groups with fracture probabilities ranging from 0.4% (95% CI: 0.1%, 1.3%) to 24.2% (95% CI: 5.7%, 100%).

CONCLUSION: Clinical factors can be used to stratify patients 65 years and older into risk groups with a wide range of probabilities of cervical spine fracture. Knowledge of cervical fracture risk can help guide appropriate imaging in high-risk patients.

© RSNA, 2004

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Dammers, H. W C Bijvoet, M. J Driesse, and C. C J Avezaat Occurrence of malignant vertebral fractures in an emergency room setting Emerg. Med. J., October 1, 2007; 24(10): 707 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. C. Blackmore Clinical Prediction Rules in Trauma Imaging: Who, How, and Why? Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 371 - 374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]