|
|
||||||||
Gastrointestinal Imaging |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (R.F.A.V., E.E.M.T.L., J.M.A.v.E., R.G.H.B.T.), Surgery (G.L.B., M.F.v.M.), and Statistics (A.G.H.K.), University Hospital of Maastricht, P. Debyelaan 25, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands. From the 2002 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received August 31, 2003; revision requested November 11; final revision received April 10, 2004; accepted May 12. Address correspondence to R.F.A.V. (e-mail: rvli@rdia.azm.nl).
PURPOSE: To determine retrospectively whether addition of gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) sequence to T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (SE) MR imaging is valuable for preoperative assessment of T stage and circumferential resection margin in patients with primary rectal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Local institutional review board approved study and waived informed patient consent. Eighty-three patients with operable primary rectal cancer underwent preoperative MR imaging. Retrospectively, two observers independently scored T2-weighted turbo SE MR images and, in a second reading, T2-weighted images combined with gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted turbo SE MR images for tumor penetration through rectal wall and tumor extension into mesorectal fascia. A confidence level scoring system was used, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. Histologic findings were standard of reference. Difference in performance of T2-weighted and combined T2-weighted plus gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted sequences was analyzed by comparing corresponding areas under ROC curves (Az) for each observer. Interobserver agreement was calculated by using linear weighted
statistics.
RESULTS: Addition of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted to T2-weighted MR imaging did not significantly improve diagnostic accuracy for prediction of tumor penetration through rectal wall (Az of T2-weighted vs T2-weighted plus T1-weighted images for observer 1, 0.740 vs 0.764; observer 2, 0.856 vs 0.768) and tumor extension into mesorectal fascia (Az for observer 1, 0.962 vs 0.902; observer 2, 0.902 vs 0.911). Diagnostic performance (Az) of MR and interobserver agreement were high for prediction of tumor extension into mesorectal fascia (
= 0.61, 0.74) but only moderate for penetration through rectal wall (
= 0.47, 0.45).
CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced MR sequences did not improve diagnostic accuracy for assessment of tumor penetration through rectal wall and tumor extension into mesorectal fascia.
© RSNA, 2004
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. G. M. Taylor, R. I. Swift, L. Blomqvist, and G. Brown A Systematic Approach to the Interpretation of Preoperative Staging MRI for Rectal Cancer Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): 1827 - 1835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Oostendorp, K. Douma, T. M. Hackeng, A. Dirksen, M. J. Post, M. A.M.J. van Zandvoort, and W. H. Backes Quantitative Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis Using cNGR-Labeled Paramagnetic Quantum Dots Cancer Res., September 15, 2008; 68(18): 7676 - 7683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Chun, D. Choi, M. J. Kim, J. Lee, S. H. Yun, S. H. Kim, S. J. Lee, and C. K. Kim Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography. Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1557 - 1562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Iafrate, A. Laghi, P. Paolantonio, M. Rengo, P. Mercantini, M. Ferri, V. Ziparo, and R. Passariello Preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MR Imaging: correlation with surgical and histopathologic findings. RadioGraphics, May 1, 2006; 26(3): 701 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |