Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print November 18, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2341031596
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2341031596v1
234/1/256    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saupe, N.
Right arrow Articles by Weishaupt, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saupe, N.
Right arrow Articles by Weishaupt, D.
(Radiology 2005;234:256-264.)
© RSNA, 2004


Technical Developments

MR Imaging of the Wrist: Comparison between 1.5- and 3-T MR Imaging—Preliminary Experience1

Nadja Saupe, MD, Klaas P. Prüssmann, PhD, Roger Luechinger, PhD, Peter Bösiger, PhD, Borut Marincek, MD and Dominik Weishaupt, MD

1 From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland (N.S., B.M., D.W.); and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland (K.P.P., R.L., P.B.). Received October 1, 2003; revision requested December 18; revision received March 15, 2004; accepted April 22. Address correspondence to D.W. (e-mail: dominik.weishaupt@usz.ch).

Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained from 25 healthy volunteers and 15 consecutive patients with chronic wrist pain or suspected carpal mass, and 1.5- and 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the wrist was prospectively performed with comparable sequence parameters and surface coils of the same geometric design. Imaging protocols at both field strengths included a T1-weighted spin-echo sequence, two intermediate-weighted fast SE sequences with different echo times and with and without fat saturation, and a three-dimensional fast field-echo sequence. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between muscle and bone and between bone and cartilage was calculated for both field strengths. The visibility of various anatomic structures, including the triangular fibrocartilage complex, carpal ligaments, nerves, and cartilage, was analyzed with a four-point grading scale. CNRs were significantly higher on 3-T MR images than on 1.5-T MR images (P < .001; analysis of variance) for all sequences. Visibility of the triangular fibrocartilage complex and intercarpal ligaments and cartilage was significantly better on 3-T MR images than on 1.5-T MR images (paired sign test).

© RSNA, 2004




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Zhao, R. Krug, D. Xu, Y. Lu, and T. M. Link
MRI of the Spine: Image Quality and Normal-Neoplastic Bone Marrow Contrast at 3 T Versus 1.5 T
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 873 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A.-M. Machata, H. Willschke, B. Kabon, D. Prayer, and P. Marhofer
Effect of brain magnetic resonance imaging on body core temperature in sedated infants and children
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2009; 102(3): 385 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Magee
Comparison of 3-T MRI and Arthroscopy of Intrinsic Wrist Ligament and TFCC Tears
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): 80 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl, F. Traber, J. Gieseke, W. Drahanowsky, N. Morakkabati-Spitz, W. Willinek, M. von Falkenhausen, C. Manka, and H. H. Schild
Whole-Body High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice * Part II. Technical Considerations and Clinical Applications
Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 16 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. Saupe, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, M. R. Schmid, T. Schertler, M. Manestar, and D. Weishaupt
MR Imaging of Cartilage in Cadaveric Wrists: Comparison between Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T and Gross Pathologic Inspection
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 180 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. Ruegger, M. R. Schmid, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, L. Nagy, L. A. Gilula, and M. Zanetti
Peripheral Tear of the Triangular Fibrocartilage: Depiction with MR Arthrography of the Distal Radioulnar Joint
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 187 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]