Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2341031859
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Froger, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by van den Bosch, H. C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Froger, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by van den Bosch, H. C. M.
(Radiology 2005;234:284-291.)
© RSNA, 2005


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Stenosis Detection with MR Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Dysfunctional Hemodialysis Access Fistulas and Grafts1

Clemence L. Froger, MD, Lucien E. M. Duijm, MD, PhD, Ylian S. Liem, MD, MSc, Alexander V. Tielbeek, MD, PhD, Astrid B. Donkers–van Rossum, MD, PhD, Petra Douwes-Draaijer, MD, PhD, Philippe W. M. Cuypers, MD, PhD, Jaap Buth, MD, PhD and Harrie C. M. van den Bosch, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (C.L.F., L.E.M.D, A.V.T., A.B.D.v.R., H.C.M.v.d.B), Nephrology (P.D.D.), and Vascular Surgery (P.W.M.C., J.B.), Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Radiology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands (Y.S.L.). Received November 19, 2003; revision requested February 6, 2004; revision received March 11; accepted April 8. Address correspondence to L.E.M.D. (e-mail: lemduijm@hotmail.com).

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess three-dimensional contrast material–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for stenosis depiction in malfunctioning hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and grafts (AVGs), as compared with digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ethical review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. MR angiography and DSA were performed in 51 dysfunctional hemodialysis fistulas and grafts in 48 consecutive patients. Vascular tree of accesses was divided into between three and eight segments depending on access type (AVF or AVG) and length of venous outflow. Images obtained with MR and DSA were interpreted by two MR radiologists and two interventional radiologists, respectively, who were blinded to information from each other and other studies. DSA was reference standard for stenosis detection. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of contrast-enhanced MR in detection of vascular segments containing hemodynamically significant (≥50%) stenosis were calculated. Linear-weighted {kappa} statistic was calculated for contrast-enhanced MR and DSA to determine interobserver agreement regarding stenosis detection.

RESULTS: A total of 282 vascular segments were evaluated. Contrast-enhanced MR depicted three false-positive stenoses and all but two of 70 significant stenoses depicted with DSA. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of MR in detection of vessel segments with significant stenoses were 97% (95% CI: 90%, 99%), 99% (95% CI: 96%, 100%), 96% (95% CI: 88%, 99%), and 99% (95% CI: 97%, 100%), respectively. MR demonstrated significant stenosis in four of five nondiagnostic DSA segments, whereas DSA showed no significant stenosis in four nondiagnostic MR segments. Linear-weighted {kappa} statistic for interobserver agreement regarding stenosis detection was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.95) for MR and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.97) for DSA.

CONCLUSION: MR angiography depicts stenoses in dysfunctional hemodialysis accesses but has limited clinical value as result of current inability to perform MR-guided access interventions after stenosis detection. MR of dysfunctional access should be considered only if nondiagnostic vascular segment is present at DSA.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
L. E. M. Duijm, E. H. Overbosch, Y. S. Liem, R. N. Planken, J. H. M. Tordoir, P. W. M. Cuypers, P. Douwes-Draaijer, and M. W. de Haan
Retrograde catheterization of haemodialysis fistulae and grafts: angiographic depiction of the entire vascular access tree and stenosis treatment
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 18, 2008; (2008) gfn526v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Y. Kim, R. A. Mirza, J. A. Bryant, E. D. Whiting, D. M. Delong, C. E. Spritzer, and E. M. Merkle
Central Veins of the Chest: Evaluation with Time-resolved MR Angiography
Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 558 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Zhang, E. M. Hecht, T. Maldonado, and V. S. Lee
Time-Resolved 3D MR Angiography with Parallel Imaging for Evaluation of Hemodialysis Fistulas and Grafts: Initial Experience.
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186(5): 1436 - 1442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.