Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print December 10, 2004, 10.1148/radiol.2342031456
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2342031456v1
234/2/423    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, K. H.
(Radiology 2005;234:423-430.)
© RSNA, 2004


Experimental Studies

VX2 Carcinoma in Rabbits after Radiofrequency Ablation: Comparison of MR Contrast Agents for Help in Differentiating Benign Periablational Enhancement from Residual Tumor1

Tae Jung Kim, MD, Woo Kyung Moon, MD, Joo Hee Cha, MD, Jin Mo Goo, MD, Kyoung Ho Lee, MD, Keon Ha Kim, MD, Joon Woo Lee, MD, Joon Goo Han, MD, Hanns-Joachim Weinmann, PhD and Kee Hyun Chang, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology and Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital (T.J.K., W.K.M., J.H.C., J.M.G., K.H.L., K.H.K., J.W.L., J.G.H., K.H.C.) and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center (T.J.K., W.K.M.), 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110–744, Korea; and Department of Contrast Media Research, Schering, Berlin, Germany (H.J.W.). Supported by grant of the National R & D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (0420080–1). W.K.M. supported by a grant from Schering, Berlin, Germany. Received September 11, 2003; revision requested November 24; revision received March 12, 2004; accepted April 22. Address correspondence to W.K.M. (e-mail: moonwk@radcom.snu.ac.kr).

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the accuracy of a blood pool agent, SH L 643A, with that of gadopentetate dimeglumine in differentiating benign periablational enhancement from residual tumor in VX2 carcinomas in rabbits after radiofrequency (RF) ablation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experiment was approved by the animal care committee. Sequential MR images were obtained before and with SH L 643A (17 000 Da, 0.05 mmol/kg) and, after a 24-hour interval, gadopentetate dimeglumine (546 Da, 0.1 mmol/kg) in 12 rabbits with VX2 carcinoma in the back muscle prior to (n = 12) and early (n = 12), 1 week (n = 8), and 4 weeks (n = 4) after RF ablation. RF ablation was performed with output of 90 W but at less than 300 seconds to ensure incomplete tumor ablation. The pathologic specimens were sectioned in the same plane as MR imaging, and the enhancement ratios (ie, the ratios of postcontrast to precontrast signal intensity) and the microvessel densities of residual tumor and benign periablational enhancement were assessed.

RESULTS: With SH L 643A, the peak enhancement ratios of residual tumor (1.64 ± 0.31 [standard deviation]) were significantly higher than those of benign periablational enhancement (0.97 ± 0.16) (P < .001). With gadopentetate dimeglumine, the peak enhancement ratios of residual tumor (1.82 ± 0.33) were not different from those of benign periablational enhancement (1.71 ± 0.36). In benign periablational enhancement, enhancement ratios with injection of SH L 643A were lower than those with injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine for all time points up to 30 minutes (P < .05). The microvessel density was 25.72 ± 5.43 vessels per field of view for residual tumor and 10.37 ± 2.88 vessels per field of view for benign periablational enhancement (P < .001).

CONCLUSION: Blood pool contrast agent SH L 643A permits more accurate differentiation of benign periablational enhancement from residual tumor compared with the extracellular agent gadopentetate dimeglumine.

© RSNA, 2004




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
F. M. Vogt, G. Antoch, P. Veit, L. S. Freudenberg, N. Blechschmid, O. Diersch, A. Bockisch, J. Barkhausen, and H. Kuehl
Morphologic and Functional Changes in Nontumorous Liver Tissue After Radiofrequency Ablation in an In Vivo Model: Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, Ultrasound, and CT
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1836 - 1844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Ni, F. Chen, G. Marchal, T. J. Kim, W. K. Moon, and S. N. Goldberg
Differentiation of Residual Tumor from Benign Periablational Tissues after Radiofrequency Ablation: The Role of MR Imaging Contrast Agents * Drs Kim and Moon respond: * Dr Goldberg responds:
Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 745 - 749.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.