Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print January 21, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2343031784
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2343031784v1
234/3/718    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sommer, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schild, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sommer, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schild, H.
(Radiology 2005;234:718-725.)
© RSNA, 2005


Cardiac Imaging

Coronary MR Angiography at 3.0 T versus That at 1.5 T: Initial Results in Patients Suspected of Having Coronary Artery Disease1

Torsten Sommer, MD, Matthias Hackenbroch, MD, Ulrich Hofer, MD, Alexandra Schmiedel, MD, Winfried A. Willinek, MD, Sebastian Flacke, MD, Jürgen Gieseke, PhD, Frank Träber, PhD, Rolf Fimmers, PhD, Harold Litt, MD, PhD and Hans Schild, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (T.S., M.H., U.H., A.S., W.A.W., S.F., F.T., H.S.) and Statistics and Biometrics (R.F.), University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, D-53105 Bonn, Germany; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands (J.G.); and the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (H.L.). Received November 5, 2003; revision requested January 27, 2004; revision received June 3; accepted June 15. Address correspondence to T.S. (e-mail: t.sommer@uni-bonn.de).

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the feasibility, image quality, and accuracy of coronary magnetic resonance (MR) angiography at 3.0 T in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease and to prospectively compare these results with those of coronary MR angiography performed at 1.5 T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Eighteen patients (11 men, seven women; mean age, 63 years; age range, 45–76 years) suspected of having coronary artery disease who were scheduled to undergo elective conventional coronary angiography (reference standard) were included. For coronary MR angiography at 3.0 and 1.5 T, a vector electrocardiographically gated three-dimensional segmented k-space gradient-echo imaging sequence was combined with real-time respiratory navigator gating and tracking. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs), scores of image quality and sensitivity and specificity for the detection of coronary artery stenosis on a segment-by-segment basis were assessed at 3.0 and 1.5 T. Data were analyzed for statistical differences by using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test and the McNemar test.

RESULTS: The average increase in SNR at 3.0 T with respect to that at 1.5 T was 29.5% for the left coronary artery (LCA) and 31.2% for the right coronary artery (RCA) (P < .001), and the average increase in CNR was 21.8% for the LCA and 23.5% for the RCA (P < .001). Scores of image quality (P = .77) and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of coronary artery stenoses (sensitivity and specificity: 82% and 89%, respectively, at 3.0 T vs 82% and 88% at 1.5 T; P > .99) were identical or almost identical at both field strengths.

CONCLUSION: Coronary MR angiography at 3.0 T is feasible in patients suspected of having coronary artery disease and yields significant increases in SNR and CNR, although current techniques do not result in significantly improved image quality and diagnostic accuracy compared with the quality and accuracy at 1.5 T.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl, F. Traber, J. Gieseke, W. Drahanowsky, N. Morakkabati-Spitz, W. Willinek, M. von Falkenhausen, C. Manka, and H. H. Schild
Whole-Body High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice * Part II. Technical Considerations and Clinical Applications
Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 16 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. M. Gharib, V. B. Ho, D. R. Rosing, D. A. Herzka, M. Stuber, A. E. Arai, and R. I. Pettigrew
Coronary Artery Anomalies and Variants: Technical Feasibility of Assessment with Coronary MR Angiography at 3 T
Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 220 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. Dewey, F. Teige, D. Schnapauff, M. Laule, A. C. Borges, K.-D. Wernecke, T. Schink, G. Baumann, W. Rutsch, P. Rogalla, et al.
Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
Ann Intern Med, September 19, 2006; 145(6): 407 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. K. Kuhl, P. Jost, N. Morakkabati, O. Zivanovic, H. H. Schild, and J. Gieseke
Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging of the Breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the Same Patients: Initial Experience
Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 666 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.