HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sliker, C. W. Articles by Shanmuganathan, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sliker, C. W. Articles by Shanmuganathan, K.

Assessing Cervical Spine Stability in Obtunded Blunt Trauma Patients: Review of Medical Literature¹

¹ From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 S Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201. From the 2003 RSNA Scientific Assembly. Received November 3, 2003; revision requested January 15, 2004; revision received May 17; accepted June 28. Address correspondence to C.W.S. (e-mail: csliker@umm.edu).

PURPOSE: To review the current medical literature on dynamic fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging assessment of cervical spine stability in obtunded patients who sustained blunt trauma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The English-language literature within the Swetswise and Medline databases was searched for articles describing dynamic fluoroscopic or MR imaging assessment of cervical spine stability in patients who sustained blunt trauma. Patients with fractures or radiographic signs of injury were excluded. The frequencies of purely ligamentous injuries, injuries requiring immobilization, and other clinically important nonligamentous abnormalities were determined.

RESULTS: The frequency of isolated cervical ligamentous injuries diagnosed with dynamic fluoroscopy, as reported in the literature, was 0.9% (11 of 1166 patients), whereas the reported frequency of these injuries diagnosed with MR imaging was 22.7% (125 of 550 patients). All injuries diagnosed with dynamic fluoroscopy and 101 (80.8%) of those diagnosed with MR imaging required continued cervical immobilization. Six (60%) of 10 injuries diagnosed with dynamic fluoroscopy and seven (5.6%) of 125 injuries diagnosed with MR imaging required surgical or halo stabilization. Five (2.5%) of the 200 obtunded patients assessed with MR imaging and six (0.5%) of the 1166 obtunded patients evaluated with dynamic fluoroscopy required surgery.

CONCLUSION: Review of the current medical literature provided no clear evidence of the superiority of either MR imaging or dynamic fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of unstable ligamentous injury, although other relative advantages of MR imaging indicate that it is preferred for assessing cervical spine stability in obtunded blunt trauma patients.

© RSNA, 2005