|
|
||||||||
Experimental Studies |
1 From the Departments of Radiology (H.C.T., F.D.K., F.C., Y.N., H.B., G.M., R.H.), Experimental Radiobiology/Laboratory of Experimental Oncology (W.L.), and Pathology (E.K.V.), University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium; and Department of Radiology, Zhong Da Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, China (F.C.). Received October 24, 2003; revision requested January 13, 2004; final revision received May 19; accepted June 17. H.C.T. supported by a grant from the Bernese Cancer League and by the Kurt and Senta Hermann Foundation. Address correspondence to Y.N. (e-mail: yicheng.ni@med.kuleuven.ac.be).
PURPOSE: To evaluate diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for monitoring tumor response in rats after administration of combretastatin A4 phosphate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study protocol was approved by local ethical committee for animal care and use. Rhabdomyosarcomas implanted subcutaneously in both flanks of 17 rats were evaluated with 1.5-T MR unit by using four-channel wrist coil. Transverse T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequences, T1-weighted spin-echo sequences before and after gadodiamide administration, and transverse echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR examinations were performed before, 1 and 6 hours, and 2 and 9 days after intraperitoneal injection of vascular targeting agent (combretastatin A4 phosphate, 25 mg/kg). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was automatically calculated from diffusion-weighted MR imaging findings. These findings were compared with histopathologic results at each time point. For statistical analysis, paired Student t tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing were used.
RESULTS: T1-weighted images before combretastatin administration showed enhancement of solid tumor tissue but not of central necrosis. At 1 and 6 hours after combretastatin injection, enhancement of solid tissue disappeared almost completely, with exception of small peripheral rim. At 2 and 9 days after combretastatin injection, enhancement progressively reappeared in tumor periphery. ADC, however, showed decrease early after combretastatin injection ([1.26 ± 0.16]x 103 mm2/sec before, [1.18 ± 0.17]x 103 mm2/sec 1 hour after [P = .0005] and [1.08 ± 0.14]x 103 mm2/sec 6 hours after [P = .0007] combretastatin A4 phosphate injection), histologically corresponding to vessel congestion and vascular shutdown in periphery but no necrosis. An increase of ADC ([1.79 ± 0.13]x 103 mm2/sec) (P < .0001) 2 days after combretastatin A4 phosphate injection was paralleled by progressive histologic necrosis. A significant (P < .0001) decrease in ADC 9 days after treatment ([1.41 ± 0.15]x 103 mm2/sec) corresponded to tumor regrowth.
CONCLUSION: In addition to basic relaxation-weighted MR imaging and postgadolinium T1-weighted MR imaging to enable prompt detection of vascular shutdown, diffusion-weighted MR imaging was used to discriminate between nonperfused but viable and necrotic tumor tissues for early monitoring of therapeutic effects of vascular targeting agent.
© RSNA, 2005
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Cui, X.-P. Zhang, Y.-S. Sun, L. Tang, and L. Shen Apparent Diffusion Coefficient: Potential Imaging Biomarker for Prediction and Early Detection of Response to Chemotherapy in Hepatic Metastases Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 894 - 900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-M. Koh and D. J. Collins Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Body: Applications and Challenges in Oncology Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1622 - 1635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-M. Koh, E. Scurr, D. Collins, B. Kanber, A. Norman, M. O. Leach, and J. E. Husband Predicting Response of Colorectal Hepatic Metastasis: Value of Pretreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficients Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 1001 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ichikawa, S. M. Erturk, U. Motosugi, H. Sou, H. Iino, T. Araki, and H. Fujii High-b Value Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Detecting Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Preliminary Results Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 409 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ichikawa, S. M. Erturk, U. Motosugi, H. Sou, H. Iino, T. Araki, and H. Fujii High-B-value diffusion-weighted MRI in colorectal cancer. Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2006; 187(1): 181 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Chen, X. Sun, F. De Keyzer, J. Yu, R. Peeters, W. Coudyzer, V. Vandecaveye, W. Landuyt, H. Bosmans, P. Van Hecke, et al. Liver Tumor Model with Implanted Rhabdomyosarcoma in Rats: MR Imaging, Microangiography, and Histopathologic Analysis Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 554 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mehmet Erturk, H. C. Thoeny, F. D. Keyzer, F. Chen, Y. Ni, W. Landuyt, and R. Hermans Retrospective Power Analysis: When? * Dr Thoeny and colleagues respond: * The statistical consultant responds: Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 743 - 744. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Thoeny, F. De Keyzer, V. Vandecaveye, F. Chen, X. Sun, H. Bosmans, R. Hermans, E. K. Verbeken, C. Boesch, G. Marchal, et al. Effect of Vascular Targeting Agent in Rat Tumor Model: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced versus Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Radiology, November 1, 2005; 237(2): 492 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |