HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2343031366v1 234/3/815    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kataoka, M. L. Articles by Fujii, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kataoka, M. L. Articles by Fujii, S.

Posterior Cul-de-Sac Obliteration Associated with Endometriosis: MR Imaging Evaluation¹

¹ From the Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging (M.L.K., K.T., T.Y., T.K., H.U., H.K.), Epidemiological and Clinical Research Information Management (M.R.), and Obstetrics and Gynecology (T.H., S.F.), Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. Received August 26, 2003; revision requested November 4; final revision received May 7, 2004; accepted June 17. Address correspondence to M.L.K. (e-mail: milliam@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp).

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in depicting posterior cul-de-sac obliteration in patients with endometriosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was not required for this retrospective study, but informed consent was obtained from all patients. MR images obtained between January 1989 and December 2000 in 57 women (mean age, 39 years; age range, 26–52 years) with histologically confirmed endometriosis were retrospectively evaluated by four radiologists independently. All patients underwent laparotomy or laparoscopy less than 1 month after MR imaging. MR images were evaluated for the presence and location of endometrial implants and adhesions. MR images were also scored for the presence of five findings: retroflexed uterus, elevated posterior vaginal fornix, intestinal tethering or tethered appearance of rectum in direction of uterus, faint strands between uterus and intestine, and fibrotic plaque or nodule covering serosal surface of the uterus. Interobserver agreement for each of the five findings and for the overall diagnosis of cul-de-sac obliteration was calculated. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, and statistics were determined.

RESULTS: Laparotomy or laparoscopy revealed posterior cul-de-sac obliteration in 30 patients. Overall, the four radiologists had mean accuracies of 89.0% and 76.3% for diagnosing endometrial implants and adhesions, respectively, at MR imaging. Overall, the radiologists achieved mean sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of 68.4%, 76.0%, 71.9%, 76.6%, and 68.5%, respectively, in diagnosing posterior cul-de-sac obliteration. The best accuracy (mean value, 64.5%) was obtained with the finding of fibrotic plaque in the uterine serosal surface. Readers agreed on the observations 63.2%–91.2% of the time. For the impression of the presence or absence of posterior cul-de-sac obliteration, interobserver agreement varied between substantial and moderate: Mean interobserver agreement was 78.4% (range, 70.2%–84.2%), and mean was 0.57 (range, 0.40–0.67). Mean accuracy of MR imaging for diagnosing posterior cul-de-sac obliteration was 71.9%.

CONCLUSION: These results suggest that use of the described MR imaging findings may enable diagnosis of posterior cul-de-sac obliteration.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Piketty, N. Chopin, B. Dousset, A.-E. Millischer-Bellaische, G. Roseau, M. Leconte, B. Borghese, and C. Chapron Preoperative work-up for patients with deeply infiltrating endometriosis: transvaginal ultrasonography must definitely be the first-line imaging examination Hum. Reprod., December 17, 2008; (2008) den405v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Nakai, K. Togashi, K. Kosaka, A. Kido, M. Kataoka, T. Koyama, and S. Fujii Do Anticholinergic Agents Suppress Uterine Peristalsis and Sporadic Myometrial Contractions at Cine MR Imaging? Radiology, December 19, 2007; (2007) 2461062091. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. S. Abrao, M. O. d. C. Goncalves, J. A. Dias Jr, S. Podgaec, L. P. Chamie, and R. Blasbalg Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3092 - 3097. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Pedrosa, E. A. Zeikus, D. Levine, and N. M. Rofsky MR Imaging of Acute Right Lower Quadrant Pain in Pregnant and Nonpregnant Patients RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 721 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]