HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 2343040020v1 234/3/934    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhao, B. Articles by Kalaigian, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhao, B. Articles by Kalaigian, J. P.

Pulmonary Metastases: Effect of CT Section Thickness on Measurement—Initial Experience¹

¹ From the Departments of Radiology (B.Z., L.H.S., L.W., M.S.G., C.A.C., L.J., J.P.K.) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (C.S.M.), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021. Received January 7, 2004; revision requested March 9; revision received May 3; accepted June 2. Supported in part by grants from William H. Goodwin and Alice Goodwin and the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research and The Experimental Therapeutics Center of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Address correspondence to B.Z. (e-mail: zhaob@mskcc.org).

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of commonly used computed tomographic (CT) section thicknesses on metastatic tumor measurements calculated with unidimensional, bidimensional, area, and volumetric methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Analysis and data collection were approved by the Institutional Review Board, with waived informed patient consent. Forty-two pulmonary metastases in 10 patients (three men and seven women; age range, 43–83 years; mean age, 65.4 years) were analyzed on CT scans obtained with 3.75-, 5.0-, and 7.5-mm section thicknesses. The lesions were automatically delineated by using a three-dimensional multicriteria segmentation algorithm. Unidimensional (the largest diameter), bidimensional (the product of the two maximal perpendicular diameters), maximal cross-sectional area, and volumetric measurements were automatically obtained for each pulmonary lesion on each section thickness. Means and variances were calculated, and the differences across the three section thicknesses for each of the four measurements were studied by using linear mixed-effects models. The Levene test was used to study the equality of variances.

RESULTS: Differences in the means for unidimensional, bidimensional, and area measurements were significant between a section thickness of 3.75 and 5.0 mm (unidimensional, P = .05; bidimensional, P = .05; area, P = .01) and 3.75 and 7.5 mm (unidimensional, P = .06; bidimensional, P = .03; area, P = .02), but not 5.0 and 7.5 mm. There was a significant difference in volumetric measurement as section thickness decreased from 7.5 to 5.0 mm (P <.001) and from 7.5 to 3.75 mm (P < .001). Although there was a slight trend for differences in the variances across section thickness for each measurement, none of the differences were significant.

CONCLUSION: Volumetric tumor measurements change with a reduction in section thickness from 7.5 to 5.0 and 3.75 mm. For unidimensional measurement, no change was found when thickness decreased from 7.5 to 5.0 mm.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Zhao, L. P. James, C. S. Moskowitz, P. Guo, M. S. Ginsberg, R. A. Lefkowitz, Y. Qin, G. J. Riely, M. G. Kris, and L. H. Schwartz Evaluating Variability in Tumor Measurements from Same-day Repeat CT Scans of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Radiology, July 1, 2009; 252(1): 263 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Nietert, J. G. Ravenel, W. M. Leue, J. V. Miller, K. K. Taylor, E. S. Garrett-Mayer, and G. A. Silvestri Imprecision in Automated Volume Measurements of Pulmonary Nodules and Its Effect on the Level of Uncertainty in Volume Doubling Time Estimation Chest, June 1, 2009; 135(6): 1580 - 1587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Gavrielides, L. M. Kinnard, K. J. Myers, and N. Petrick Noncalcified Lung Nodules: Volumetric Assessment with Thoracic CT Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 26 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Ravenel, W. M. Leue, P. J. Nietert, J. V. Miller, K. K. Taylor, and G. A. Silvestri Pulmonary Nodule Volume: Effects of Reconstruction Parameters on Automated Measurements--A Phantom Study Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 400 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Petrou, L. E. Quint, B. Nan, and L. H. Baker Pulmonary Nodule Volumetric Measurement Variability as a Function of CT Slice Thickness and Nodule Morphology Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 306 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Zhao, L. H. Schwartz, C. S. Moskowitz, M. S. Ginsberg, N. A. Rizvi, and M. G. Kris Lung Cancer: Computerized Quantification of Tumor Response--Initial Results Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 892 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. C. Jaffe Measures of Response: RECIST, WHO, and New Alternatives J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2006; 24(20): 3245 - 3251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]