Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 24, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2351032106
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2351032106v1
235/1/43    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by McAdams, H. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by McAdams, H. P.
(Radiology 2005;235:43-49.)
© RSNA, 2005


Cardiac Imaging

Pulmonary Vein Diameter, Cross-sectional Area, and Shape: CT Analysis1

Yun-Hyeon Kim, MD, Edith M. Marom, MD, James E. Herndon, II, PhD and H. Page McAdams, MD

1 From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea (Y.H.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Box 57, Houston, TX 77030 (E.M.M.); Departments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (J.E.H.) and Radiology (H.P.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC. Received December 30, 2003; revision requested March 2, 2004; revision received June 16; accepted July 20. Address correspondence to E.M.M. (e-mail: emarom@di.mdacc.tmc.edu).

PURPOSE: To retrospectively establish normal values for pulmonary vein diameter, cross-sectional area, and shape depicted at computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board waived patient consent requirement and approved the study. Thin-section contrast material–enhanced spiral chest CT scans in 104 patients, 68 women and 36 men (age range, 19–86 years; mean, 49 years) referred to exclude pulmonary embolism, were retrospectively reviewed. Short-axis diameter and cross-sectional area of the four major pulmonary veins (right inferior and superior, left inferior and superior) were measured at a workstation by using oblique reconstructions. Each vein was measured at six locations, 5 mm apart, starting at atrial ostium. Each measurement was performed three times by an experienced thoracic radiologist, and the mean value was recorded. Roundness was estimated by comparing the ratio of the calculated cross-sectional area to that measured. Mixed effects model was used to compare men and women relative to the distribution of diameters and surface areas and to compare roundness of the right and left veins.

RESULTS: Mean pulmonary vein diameters at the ostia were variable: right superior, 11.4–12.4 mm; left superior, 9.6–10.5 mm; right inferior, 12.3–13.1 mm; and left inferior, 9.0–9.9 mm. Diameter and cross-sectional area of the left superior pulmonary vein were significantly larger in men than in women (P < .005). As expected, the caliber of three of the four veins gradually increased as they approached the left atrium. Caliber of the left inferior pulmonary vein decreased as it entered the left atrium. None of the veins were round; all were ovoid. Left-sided veins and venous ostia were less round than right-sided veins (P < .001).

CONCLUSION: Pulmonary vein diameter, cross-sectional area, and shape vary. Particular care must be taken when the left inferior pulmonary vein is evaluated for stenosis, as it normally narrows as it enters the left atrium.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Schroeder, S. Achenbach, F. Bengel, C. Burgstahler, F. Cademartiri, P. de Feyter, R. George, P. Kaufmann, A. F. Kopp, J. Knuuti, et al.
Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: Report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2008; 29(4): 531 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. Rademaker, F. Saremi, and S. Krishnan
Invited Commentary * Authors' Response
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2007; 27(6): 1566 - 1567.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P. Ou, D. S Celermajer, G. Calcagni, F. Brunelle, D. Bonnet, and D. Sidi
Three-dimensional CT scanning: a new diagnostic modality in congenital heart disease
Heart, August 1, 2007; 93(8): 908 - 913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. D. Bahnson
Clinician's Commentary
Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 49 - 50.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.