Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print February 24, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2351040411
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2351040411v1
235/1/65    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Lussanet, Q. G.
Right arrow Articles by Backes, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Lussanet, Q. G.
Right arrow Articles by Backes, W. H.
(Radiology 2005;235:65-72.)
© RSNA, 2005


Experimental Studies

Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Kinetic Parameters and Molecular Weight of Dendritic Contrast Agents in Tumor Angiogenesis in Mice1

Quido G. de Lussanet, MD, Sander Langereis, MS, Regina G. H. Beets-Tan, MD, PhD, Marcel H. P. van Genderen, PhD, Arjan W. Griffioen, PhD, Jos M. A. van Engelshoven, MD, PhD and Walter H. Backes, PhD

1 From the Department of Radiology (Q.G.d.L., R.G.H.B.T., J.M.A.v.E., W.H.B.) and Angiogenesis Laboratory, Departments of Pathology and Internal Medicine (A.W.G.), Maastricht University Hospital, P. Debyelaan 25, 6202 AZ Maastricht, the Netherlands; and Laboratory of Macromolecular and Organic Chemistry (S.L., M.H.P.v.G.) and Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.H.P.v.G., J.M.A.v.E., W.H.B.), Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands. Received March 2, 2004; revision requested May 13; revision received June 4; accepted July 8. Supported in part by the Cardiovascular Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Address correspondence to Q.G.d.L. (e-mail: qdlu@rdia.azm.nl).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between dynamic contrast agent–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging–derived kinetic parameters and contrast agents of equal chemical composition and configuration but with different molecular weights in a tumor angiogenesis model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the ethical review committee. Maintenance and care of animals was in compliance with guidelines set by the institutional animal care committee. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging was performed with dendritic contrast agents in 16 mice with tumor xenografts; mice were placed in groups of four for each molecular weight of the contrast agent. The magnitude and spatial distribution of kinetic parameters (transfer coefficient [KPS] and plasma fraction [fPV]) were compared with molecular weight of the contrast agent by determining the Spearman correlation coefficient (r) and the quantitative relationship between the endothelial KPS and molecular weight.

RESULTS: Inverse relationships between molecular weight of contrast agent and KPS and fPV of tumor rim (r = –0.8, P < .001 and r = –0.5, P = .04, respectively) and core (r = –0.7, P = .004 and r = –0.6, P = .01, respectively) were observed. The quantitative relationship between KPS and molecular weight (MW) was KPS = 0.4/MW0.44. A decreasing stepwise pattern in fPV was noted between contrast agents with low (0.7- and 3.0-kDa) molecular weight and those with high (12- and 51-kDa) molecular weight.

CONCLUSION: Macromolecular permeability is best measured with high-molecular-weight contrast agents; endothelial KPS values measured with low-molecular-weight contrast agents incorporate tissue perfusion and permeability and demonstrate heterogeneous microcirculatory flow.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. Jain, S.K. Ellika, L. Scarpace, L.R. Schultz, J.P. Rock, J. Gutierrez, S.C. Patel, J. Ewing, and T. Mikkelsen
Quantitative Estimation of Permeability Surface-Area Product in Astroglial Brain Tumors Using Perfusion CT and Correlation with Histopathologic Grade
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 694 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. S. Fournier, V. Novikov, V. Lucidi, Y. Fu, T. Miller, E. Floyd, D. M. Shames, and R. C. Brasch
MR Monitoring of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition of Angiogenesis in a Human Breast Cancer Model in Rats
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 105 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
M. Muruganandham, M. Lupu, J. P. Dyke, C. Matei, M. Linn, K. Packman, K. Kolinsky, B. Higgins, and J. A. Koutcher
Preclinical evaluation of tumor microvascular response to a novel antiangiogenic/antitumor agent RO0281501 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 1.5 T.
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2006; 5(8): 1950 - 1957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. H. Khandani and R. C. Semelka
Can the Relation between Gadopentetate Dimeglumine and FDG Uptake in Colorectal Liver Metastases Be Used Clinically?
Radiology, October 1, 2005; 237(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. L. Choyke
Contrast Agents for Imaging Tumor Angiogenesis: Is Bigger Better?
Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.