Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2352040624
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dora, C.
Right arrow Articles by Boos, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dora, C.
Right arrow Articles by Boos, N.
(Radiology 2005;235:562-567.)
© RSNA, 2005


Musculoskeletal Imaging

Lumbar Disk Herniation: Do MR Imaging Findings Predict Recurrence after Surgical Diskectomy?1

Claudio Dora, MD, Marius R. Schmid, MD, Achim Elfering, PhD, Marco Zanetti, MD, Juerg Hodler, MD, MBA and Norbert Boos, MD

1 From the Center for Spinal Surgery (C.D., N.B.) and Department of Radiology (M.R.S., M.Z., J.H.), University of Zurich, Balgrist Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland; and Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (A.E.). Received April 5, 2004; revision requested June 16; revision received July 6; accepted August 5. Address correspondence to M.R.S. (e-mail: marius.schmid@balgrist.ch).

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate if the degree of disk degeneration and disk herniation volume at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are risk factors for recurrent disk herniation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board permits such retrospective studies, and individual informed consent was not required. MR imaging findings obtained before initial diskectomy in 30 patients (mean age, 42.8 years; 10 women, 20 men) with recurrent disk herniation (study group) and 30 patients (mean age, 42.2 years; nine women, 21 men) without recurrence for at least 2 years after surgery (control group) were compared. Disk degeneration was assessed on T2-weighted sagittal MR images with a five-point grading system (grade I indicated no degeneration; grade II, horizontal hypointense bands within disk; grade III, inhomogeneous disk with intermediate signal intensity; grade IV, no distinction between inner and outer parts of disk; and grade V, collapsed hypointense disk). Disk herniation was classified as representing protrusion, extrusion, or sequestration. The volume of both the affected intervertebral disk and the herniated disk material was measured. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed by two readers. The {chi}2 test was used for comparison of categorical variables. For comparison of disk degeneration and volumes between patients with and those without recurrence, a paired two-tailed t test was used. Odds ratios based on the extent of disk degeneration were calculated for the entire sample.

RESULTS: Advanced disk degeneration (grades IV and V) was significantly less frequent in the study group than in the control group (P < .006). The risk of recurrent disk herniation decreased by a factor of 3.4 for each increase in grade of disk degeneration (odds ratio: 3.58; 95% confidence interval: 1.3, 9.6; P = .011). Mean disk herniation volume as a percentage of intervertebral disk volume was 10.59% ± 3.41 in the study group and 11.56% ± 3.84 in the control group. This difference was not significant (P = .31).

CONCLUSION: Minor disk degeneration but not herniation volume represents a risk factor for the recurrence of disk herniation after diskectomy.

© RSNA, 2005