Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print March 15, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2352031942
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2352031942v1
235/2/604    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lyshchik, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reiners, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lyshchik, A.
Right arrow Articles by Reiners, C.
(Radiology 2005;235:604-613.)
© RSNA, 2005


Pediatric Imaging

Diagnosis of Thyroid Cancer in Children: Value of Gray-Scale and Power Doppler US1

Andrej Lyshchik, MD, Valentina Drozd, MD, PhD, Yuri Demidchik, MD, PhD and Christoph Reiners, MD, PhD

1 From the Laboratory of Thyroidology, Clinical Research Institute for Radiation Medicine and Endocrinology, Minsk, Belarus (A.L., V.D.); Department of Oncology, Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk, Belarus (Y.D.); and Clinic and Policlinic for Nuclear Medicine, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany (C.R.). Received December 7, 2003; revision requested February 10, 2004; final revision received June 24; accepted August 4. Supported in part by ISTC project 517-B. Address correspondence to A.L., Department of Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, 606-8507 Kyoto, Japan (e-mail: lyshchik@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp).

PURPOSE: To prospectively analyze the accuracy of various diagnostic criteria for cancer in solid thyroid nodules in children on the basis of gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasonographic (US) findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board, and patient’s parents gave full informed consent. One hundred three consecutive pediatric patients with solid thyroid nodules were included in the study. Thirty-five patients had thyroid cancer (mean age, 14.6 years ± 2.6 [standard deviation]; range, 10–18 years), and 68 patients had benign thyroid nodules (mean age, 14.2 years ± 2.9; range 9–18 years). Three-dimensional US was used to determine the volume of thyroid gland and thyroid nodules. Results of nodule cytologic and histologic examination and long-term clinical and US follow-up were used as a proof of final diagnosis. The following US characteristics were evaluated: location, echogenicity, echotexture, outline, presence of a halo, microcalcifications, and type of vascularization. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the accuracy of US criteria for thyroid cancer in lesions with diameter of 15 mm and smaller and lesions with diameter larger than 15 mm. Qualitative variables were compared by using the {chi}2 test and quantitative variables were compared by using the Student t test. Significance was defined at P < .05.

RESULTS: In thyroid nodules with diameter of 15 mm and smaller, the most reliable diagnostic criteria for malignancy were an irregular outline (sensitivity, 69.6%; specificity, 86.4%; P < .001), subcapsular location (sensitivity, 65.2%; specificity, 86.4%; P < .001), and increased intranodular vascularization (sensitivity, 69.6%; specificity, 87.9%; P < .01). For thyroid nodules larger than 15 mm in diameter, the accuracy of US diagnosis was much lower than that for smaller nodules. The only reliable criterion for cancer in this group was hypoechogenicity (sensitivity, 60.0%; specificity, 84.0%; P < .01).

CONCLUSION: Study findings indicate that US is most helpful in diagnosis of thyroid malignancy in thyroid nodules with diameter of 15 mm and smaller, with detection of irregular tumor outline, subcapsular location, and increased intranodular vascularization.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. O'Kane, E. Shelkovoy, R. J. McConnell, V. Shpak, L. Parker, T. I. Bogdanova, A. Brenner, Y. Naida, A. Frangos, L. Zablotska, et al.
Differences in Sonographic Conspicuity According to Papillary Thyroid Cancer Subtype: Results of the Ukrainian-American Cohort Study After the Chornobyl Accident
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): W293 - W298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. Lyshchik, R. Moses, S. L. Barnes, T. Higashi, R. Asato, M. I. Miga, J. C. Gore, and A. C. Fleischer
Quantitative Analysis of Tumor Vascularity in Benign and Malignant Solid Thyroid Nodules
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2007; 26(6): 837 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Lyshchik, T. Higashi, R. Asato, S. Tanaka, J. Ito, M. Hiraoka, M. F. Insana, A. B. Brill, T. Saga, and K. Togashi
Cervical Lymph Node Metastases: Diagnosis at Sonoelastography--Initial Experience
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 258 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M Niedziela
Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules in children.
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2006; 13(2): 427 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.