Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2352031730
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uffmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer-Prokop, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uffmann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schaefer-Prokop, C.
(Radiology 2005;235:642-650.)
© RSNA, 2005


Thoracic Imaging

Flat-Panel–Detector Chest Radiography: Effect of Tube Voltage on Image Quality1

Martin Uffmann, MD, Ulrich Neitzel, PhD, Mathias Prokop, MD, Nahla Kabalan, BSc, Michael Weber, MSc, Christian J. Herold, MD and Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Vienna Medical School, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Wien, Waehringer Guertel 18–20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria (M.U., N.K., M.W., C.J.H., C.S.P.); Philips Medical Systems, Hamburg, Germany (U.N.); and Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands (M.P.). From the 2002 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received October 26, 2003; revision requested January 13, 2004; final revision received June 21; accepted July 2. Address correspondence to M.U. (e-mail: martin.uffmann@meduniwien.ac.at).

PURPOSE: To compare the visibility of anatomic structures in direct-detector chest radiographs acquired with different tube voltages at equal effective doses to the patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the institutional internal review board, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Posteroanterior chest radiographs of 48 consecutively selected patients were obtained at 90, 121, and 150 kVp by using a flat-panel–detector unit that was based on cesium iodide technology and automated exposure control. Monte Carlo simulations were used to verify that the effective dose for all kilovoltage settings was equal. Five radiologists subjectively and independently rated the delineation of anatomic structures on hard-copy images by using a five-point scale. They also ranked image quality in a blinded side-by-side comparison. Average ranking scores were compared by using one-way analysis of variance with repeated measures. Data were analyzed for the entire patient group and for two patient subgroups that were formed according to body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS: The visibility scores of most anatomic structures were significantly superior with the 90-kVp images (mean score, 3.11), followed by the 121-kVp (mean score, 2.95) and 150-kVp images (mean score, 2.80). Differences did not reach significance (P > .05) only for the delineation of the peripheral vessels, the heart contours, and the carina. This was also true for the subgroup of patients (n = 24) with a BMI greater than and the subgroup of patients (n = 24) with a BMI less than the mean BMI (26.9 kg/m2). At side-by-side comparison, the readers rated 90-kVp images as having superior image quality in the majority of image triplets; the percentage of 90-kVp images rated as "first choice" ranged from 60% (29 of 48 patients) to 90% (43 of 48 patients), with a median of 88% (42 of 48 patients), among the readers.

CONCLUSION: Delineation of most anatomic structures and overall image quality were ranked superior in digital radiographs acquired with lower kilovoltage at a constant effective patient dose.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
L J M Kroft, W J H Veldkamp, B J A Mertens, J-P A van Delft, and J Geleijns
Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality
Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2007; 80(960): 984 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.