Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print March 15, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2352031693
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2352031693v1
235/2/687    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoenberg, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Reiser, M. F.
(Radiology 2005;235:687-698.)
© RSNA, 2005


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

High-Spatial-Resolution MR Angiography of Renal Arteries with Integrated Parallel Acquisitions: Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography and US1

Stefan O. Schoenberg, MD, Johannes Rieger, MD, Christof H. Weber, MD, Henrik J. Michaely, MD, Tobias Waggershauser, MD, Carina Ittrich, PhD, Olaf Dietrich, PhD and Maximilian F. Reiser, MD

1 From the Institute of Clinical Radiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377 Munich, Germany (S.O.S., J.R., C.H.W., H.J.M., T.W., O.D., M.F.R.); and Central Biostatistics Unit, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany (C.I.). Received October 20, 2003; revision requested January 12, 2004; final revision received June 20; accepted July 26. Address correspondence to S.O.S. (e-mail: stefan.schoenberg@med.uni-muenchen.de).

PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, performed with an integrated parallel acquisition technique for high isotropic spatial resolution, with selective digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and intravascular ultrasonography (US) for accuracy of diameter and area measurements in renal artery stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board, and consent was obtained from all patients. Forty-five patients (17 women, 28 men; mean age, 62.2 years) were evaluated for suspected renal artery stenosis. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiograms were acquired with isotropic spatial resolution of 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.9 mm in 23-second breath-hold with an integrated parallel acquisition technique. In-plane diameter of stenosis was measured along vessel axis, and perpendicular diameter and area of stenosis were assessed in cross sections orthogonal to vessel axis, on multiplanar reformations. Interobserver agreement between two radiologists in measurements of in-plane and perpendicular diameters of stenosis and perpendicular area of stenosis was assessed with mean percentage of difference. In a subset of patients, degree of stenosis at MR angiography was compared with that at DSA (n = 20) and intravascular US (n = 11) by using Bland-Altman plots and correlation analyses.

RESULTS: Mean percentage of difference in stenosis measurement was reduced from 39.3% ± 78.4 (standard deviation) with use of in-plane views to 12.6% ± 9.5 with use of cross-sectional views (P < .05). Interobserver agreement for stenosis grading based on perpendicular area of stenosis was significantly better than that for stenosis grading based on in-plane diameter of stenosis (mean percentage of difference, 15.2% ± 24.2 vs 54.9% ± 186.9; P < .001). Measurements of perpendicular area of stenosis on MR angiograms correlated well with those on intravascular US images (r2 = 0.90).

CONCLUSION: Evaluation of cross-sectional images reconstructed from high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR renal angiographic data increases the accuracy of the technique and decreases interobserver variability.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. R. Hadizadeh, J. Gieseke, S. H. Lohmaier, K. Wilhelm, J. Boschewitz, F. Verrel, H. H. Schild, and W. A. Willinek
Peripheral MR Angiography with Blood Pool Contrast Agent: Prospective Intraindividual Comparative Study of High-Spatial-Resolution Steady-State MR Angiography versus Standard-Resolution First-Pass MR Angiography and DSA
Radiology, September 3, 2008; (2008) 2492072033.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. Kramer, J. Wiskirchen, M. C. Fenchel, A. Seeger, G. Laub, G. Tepe, J. P. Finn, C. D. Claussen, and S. Miller
Isotropic High-Spatial-Resolution Contrast-enhanced 3.0-T MR Angiography in Patients Suspected of Having Renal Artery Stenosis
Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 228 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. U. Herborn, V. M. Runge, D. M. Watkins, J. M. Gendron, and L. G. Naul
MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries: Intraindividual Comparison of Double-Dose Contrast Enhancement at 1.5 T with Standard Dose at 3 T
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2008; 190(1): 173 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. G. Lohan, F. Barkhordarian, R. Saleh, M. Krishnam, N. Salamon, S. G. Ruehm, and J. P. Finn
MR Angiography at 3 T for Assessment of the External Carotid Artery System
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1088 - 1094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Sutter, D. Nanz, A. M. Lutz, T. Pfammatter, B. Seifert, A. Struwe, C. Heilmaier, D. Weishaupt, B. Marincek, and J. K. Willmann
Assessment of Aortoiliac and Renal Arteries: MR Angiography with Parallel Acquisition versus Conventional MR Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography
Radiology, October 1, 2007; 245(1): 276 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. F. Glockner
Incidental Findings on Renal MR Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 693 - 700.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. J. Michaely, H. Kramer, O. Dietrich, K. Nael, K.-P. Lodemann, M. F. Reiser, and S. O. Schoenberg
Intraindividual Comparison of High-Spatial-Resolution Abdominal MR Angiography at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Initial Experience
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 907 - 913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Maki, G. J. Wilson, W. B. Eubank, D. J. Glickerman, J. A. Millan, and R. M. Hoogeveen
Navigator-Gated MR Angiography of the Renal Arteries: A Potential Screening Tool for Renal Artery Stenosis
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): W540 - W546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Nikolaou, H. Kramer, C. Grosse, D. Clevert, O. Dietrich, M. Hartmann, P. Chamberlin, S. Assmann, M. F. Reiser, and S. O. Schoenberg
High-Spatial-Resolution Multistation MR Angiography with Parallel Imaging and Blood Pool Contrast Agent: Initial Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 861 - 872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Kramer, S. O. Schoenberg, K. Nikolaou, A. Huber, A. Struwe, E. Winnik, B. J. Wintersperger, O. Dietrich, B. Kiefer, and M. F. Reiser
Cardiovascular Screening with Parallel Imaging Techniques and a Whole-Body MR Imager
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 300 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THERHome page
S. C. Josephs
Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Angiography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Diagnosing Renal Artery Stenosis
Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2005; 17(2): 180-1 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.