HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goo, J. M. Articles by Bae, K. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goo, J. M. Articles by Bae, K. T.

Volumetric Measurement of Synthetic Lung Nodules with Multi–Detector Row CT: Effect of Various Image Reconstruction Parameters and Segmentation Thresholds on Measurement Accuracy¹

¹ From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110 (J.M.G., T.T., R.T., K.Y., C.F.H., K.T.B.); and Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea (J.M.G.). Received April 23, 2004; revision requested July 2; revision received July 19; accepted August 18. Address correspondence to K.T.B. (e-mail: baet@mir.wustl.edu).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of various multi–detector row computed tomographic (CT) reconstruction parameters and nodule segmentation thresholds on the accuracy of volumetric measurement of synthetic lung nodules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Synthetic lung nodules of four different diameters (3.2, 4.8, 6.4, and 12.7 mm) were scanned with multi–detector row CT. Images were reconstructed at various section thicknesses (0.75, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 5.0 mm), fields of view (30, 20, and 10 cm), and reconstruction intervals (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm). The nodules were segmented from the simulated background lung region by using four segmentation thresholds (–300, –400, –500, and –600 HU), and their volumes were estimated and compared with a reference standard (measurements according to fluid displacement) by computing the absolute percentage error (APE). APE was regressed against nodule size, and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed with APE as the dependent variable and with four within-subject factors (field of view, reconstruction interval, threshold, and section thickness).

RESULTS: The MANOVA demonstrated statistically significant effects for threshold (P = .02), section thickness (P < .01), and interaction of threshold and section thickness (P = .04). The regression of mean APE values on nodule size indicates that APE progressively increases with decreasing synthetic nodule size (R² = 0.99, P < .01).

CONCLUSION: For accurate measurement of lung nodule volume, it is critical to select a section thickness and/or segmentation threshold appropriate for the size of a nodule.

© RSNA, 2005

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. Wang, R. J. van Klaveren, H. J. van der Zaag-Loonen, G. H. de Bock, H. A. Gietema, D. M. Xu, A. L. M. Leusveld, H. J. de Koning, E. T. Scholten, J. Verschakelen, et al. Effect of Nodule Characteristics on Variability of Semiautomated Volume Measurements in Pulmonary Nodules Detected in a Lung Cancer Screening Program Radiology, August 1, 2008; 248(2): 625 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Bankier, C. R. O'Donnell, and P. M. Boiselle Quality Initiatives * Respiratory Instructions for CT Examinations of the Lungs: A Hands-on Guide RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 919 - 931. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Ravenel, W. M. Leue, P. J. Nietert, J. V. Miller, K. K. Taylor, and G. A. Silvestri Pulmonary Nodule Volume: Effects of Reconstruction Parameters on Automated Measurements--A Phantom Study Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 400 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Honda, T. Johkoh, H. Sumikawa, A. Inoue, N. Tomiyama, N. Mihara, Y. Fujita, M. Tsubamoto, M. Yanagawa, T. Daimon, et al. Pulmonary Nodules: 3D Volumetric Measurement with Multidetector CT Effect of Intravenous Contrast Medium Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 881 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H Bolte, C Riede, S Muller-Hulsbeck, S Freitag-Wolf, G Kohl, T Drews, M Heller, and J Bieder Precision of computer-aided volumetry of artificial small solid pulmonary nodules in ex vivo porcine lungs Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2007; 80(954): 414 - 421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Petrou, L. E. Quint, B. Nan, and L. H. Baker Pulmonary Nodule Volumetric Measurement Variability as a Function of CT Slice Thickness and Nodule Morphology Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 306 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. C. Yeshwant, R. M. Summers, J. Yao, D. S. Brickman, J. R. Choi, and P. J. Pickhardt Polyps: Linear and Volumetric Measurement at CT Colonography Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 802 - 811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-S. Kim, J.-H. Kim, G. Cho, and K. T. Bae Automated Detection of Pulmonary Nodules on CT Images: Effect of Section Thickness and Reconstruction Interval--Initial Results Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 295 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]