|
|
||||||||
Experimental Studies |
1 From the Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Ave, A 367, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (J.N.M., C.A.S., C.P., D.N., L.S., S.M., T.M.L.); and GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis (E.H.). Received April 24, 2004; revision requested July 12; revision received August 5; accepted September 2. Address correspondence to T.M.L. (e-mail: tmlink{at}radiology.ucsf.edu).
PURPOSE: To compare 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) images of porcine knee specimens containing artificial cartilage lesions in terms of accuracy of lesion depiction, image quality, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Actcompliant study had institutional review board approval, and informed consent was obtained from the human volunteers. Two fat-saturated cartilage MR imaging sequences (an intermediate-weighted fast spin-echo [SE] sequence and a spoiled gradient-echo [GRE] sequence) were optimized for imaging at 3.0 T in two human volunteers and then used to image 10 porcine knees in which 29 artificial cartilage lesions had been created. Corresponding sequences were used at 1.5 T for all specimens. Images were assessed by two radiologists in consensus, and diagnostic performance in lesion depiction was determined by using macroscopic findings in specimen slices as a reference standard. SNRs were also calculated. For statistical analysis, the McNemar test of discordant pairs was used with a level of significance of P < .05.
RESULTS: The best diagnostic performance for both the intermediate-weighted fast SE and the spoiled GRE sequences was achieved at 3.0 T. With use of corresponding fat-saturated intermediate-weighted fast SE sequences with an identical acquisition time (9 minutes 44 seconds), 26 (90%) of 29 lesions were detected at 3.0 T, while 18 (62%) were detected at 1.5 T. With use of fat-saturated spoiled GRE sequences, 24 (83%) of 29 lesions were detected at 3.0 T (acquisition time, 8 minutes 48 seconds), and 23 (79%) lesions were detected at 1.5 T (acquisition time, 11 minutes 14 seconds). The rate of correct lesion grade assessment was 65% (17 of 26 lesions) at 3.0 T and 61% (11 of 18 lesions) at 1.5 T with the intermediate-weighted fast SE sequences and 83% (20 of 24 lesions) at 3.0 T and 70% (16 of 23 lesions) at 1.5 T with the spoiled GRE sequences. Both subjective evaluation of image quality and SNR values were significantly higher at 3.0 T (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: In this animal model, MR imaging at 3.0 T increased the accuracy of cartilage lesion assessment when compared with imaging at 1.5 T. Image quality and SNR were highest at 3.0 T.
© RSNA, 2005
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Zhao, R. Krug, D. Xu, Y. Lu, and T. M. Link MRI of the Spine: Image Quality and Normal-Neoplastic Bone Marrow Contrast at 3 T Versus 1.5 T Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2009; 192(4): 873 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kijowski, D. G. Blankenbaker, K. W. Davis, K. Shinki, L. D. Kaplan, and A. A. De Smet Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR Imaging for Evaluating the Articular Cartilage of the Knee Joint Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 839 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Jung, Y. C. Yoon, S.-H. Choi, J. W. Kwon, J. Yoo, and B.-K. Choe Three-dimensional Isotropic Shoulder MR Arthrography: Comparison with Two-dimensional MR Arthrography for the Diagnosis of Labral Lesions at 3.0 T Radiology, February 1, 2009; 250(2): 498 - 505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Kuhl, F. Traber, J. Gieseke, W. Drahanowsky, N. Morakkabati-Spitz, W. Willinek, M. von Falkenhausen, C. Manka, and H. H. Schild Whole-Body High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) MR Imaging in Clinical Practice * Part II. Technical Considerations and Clinical Applications Radiology, April 1, 2008; 247(1): 16 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Bauer, S. Banerjee, T. D. Henning, R. Krug, S. Majumdar, and T. M. Link Fast High-Spatial-Resolution MRI of the Ankle with Parallel Imaging Using GRAPPA at 3 T Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2007; 189(1): 240 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Saupe, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, M. R. Schmid, T. Schertler, M. Manestar, and D. Weishaupt MR Imaging of Cartilage in Cadaveric Wrists: Comparison between Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T and Gross Pathologic Inspection Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 180 - 187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Bauer, S. J. Krause, C. J. Ross, R. Krug, J. Carballido-Gamio, E. Ozhinsky, S. Majumdar, and T. M. Link Volumetric Cartilage Measurements of Porcine Knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR Imaging: Evaluation of Precision and Accuracy. Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 399 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Phan, M. Matsuura, J. S. Bauer, T. C. Dunn, D. Newitt, E. M. Lochmueller, F. Eckstein, S. Majumdar, and T. M. Link Trabecular Bone Structure of the Calcaneus: Comparison of MR Imaging at 3.0 and 1.5 T with Micro-CT as the Standard of Reference Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 488 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||