Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print June 13, 2005, 10.1148/radiol.2361040792
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2361040792v1
236/1/178    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choi, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, B. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choi, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, B. I.
(Radiology 2005;236:178-183.)
© RSNA, 2005


Gastrointestinal Imaging

Differentiating Malignant from Benign Common Bile Duct Stricture with Multiphasic Helical CT1

Seung Hong Choi, MD, Joon Koo Han, MD, Jeong Min Lee, MD, Kyoung Ho Lee, MD, Se Hyung Kim, MD, Jae Young Lee, MD and Byung Ihn Choi, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea. Received May 2, 2004; revision requested July 14; revision received August 3; accepted September 23. Supported in part by the 2001 BK21 Project for Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmacy. Address correspondence to J.K.H. (e-mail: hanjk{at}radcom.snu.ac.kr).

PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively the use of multiphasic helical computed tomography (CT) to differentiate malignant and benign common bile duct (CBD) strictures in patients with only a focal CBD stricture and to determine predictors for this differentiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed patient consent were not required. Fifty patients (35 men, 15 women; age range, 35–87 years; mean age, 61.6 years) with only a focal CBD stricture comprised the sample for this study (32 malignant and 18 benign strictures). The diagnosis of all malignant and five benign CBD strictures was confirmed by reviewing patients' surgical and pathology records; in 13 benign CBD strictures, the diagnosis was confirmed by means of clinical features. Multiphasic CT findings were analyzed with regard to the wall thickness, location, length, and enhancement pattern of the involved CBD, the upstream CBD diameter, and other findings. CT features to identify benign and malignant CBD strictures were compared by means of univariate analysis and multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS: Malignant strictures were longer (17.9 mm ± 6.6 [± standard deviation]) than benign strictures (8.9 mm ± 6.8) (P < .0001), and upstream CBD diameters were larger in malignant cases (22.0 mm ± 5.4) than in benign cases (17.8 mm ± 4.6) (P = .033). The involved wall thickness was more than 1.5 mm in 26 malignant cases and three benign cases (P < .0001). During both hepatic arterial and portal venous phases, greater enhancement than that in the normal CBD were more frequently observed in malignant cases (in 27 and 30 patients for hepatic arterial and portal venous phase scans, respectively) than in benign cases (in two and three patients, respectively) (P < .0001). Results of multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that hyperenhancement of the involved CBD during the portal venous phase was the only variable that could be used to independently differentiate malignant from benign strictures.

CONCLUSION: Hyperenhancement of the involved CBD during the portal venous phase is the main factor distinguishing malignant from benign CBD strictures.

© RSNA, 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. J. Kim, J. M. Lee, J. Y. Lee, S. H. Kim, J. K. Han, B. I. Choi, and J. Y. Choi
Analysis of Enhancement Pattern of Flat Gallbladder Wall Thickening on MDCT to Differentiate Gallbladder Cancer from Cholecystitis
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 765 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. S. Park, J. M. Lee, J.-Y. Choi, M. W. Lee, H. J. Kim, J. K. Han, and B. I. Choi
Preoperative Evaluation of Bile Duct Cancer: MRI Combined with MR Cholangiopancreatography Versus MDCT with Direct Cholangiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 396 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
E Choi, J H Byun, B J Park, and M-G Lee
Duplication of the extrahepatic bile duct with anomalous union of the pancreaticobiliary ductal system revealed by MR cholangiopancreatography
Br. J. Radiol., July 1, 2007; 80(955): e150 - e154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. K. Choi, J. H. Byun, S. J. Lee, S. E. Jung, M.-S. Park, S. Ho Park, and M.-G. Lee
Imaging Findings of Leukemic Involvement of the Pancreaticobiliary System in Adults
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1589 - 1595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J. M. Slattery and D. V. Sahani
What Is the Current State-of-the-Art Imaging for Detection and Staging of Cholangiocarcinoma?
Oncologist, September 1, 2006; 11(8): 913 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.